Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I suggest that Southwark Events should be active communicating with ward Councillors to withhold support given the lack of licences? Rather indulgent/perverse of Cllrs to support this given the weddings, funerals, events generally that are barred at present.........


alice Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes that is the advice I was given by Southwark

> council today.

Hmmm, a bit confused. There's at least one poster on here who was defending the overnight revellers on Peckham Rye with their sound systems and littering and noise (when other posters were questioning it), yet seems to think a tea dance on a Saturday morning is worth trying to stop.

Inconsistent. Yet consistent.

tomskip Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes, contradictory posts about late night/early

> morning gatherings on Dawsons Hill too.


I suspect it's the new sort of politics where everything is seen through the prism of one argument.


But many politicians seem happy with that.

well there is that too....where all-nighters and littering is just kids being kids.


tomskip Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes, contradictory posts about late night/early

> morning gatherings on Dawsons Hill too.

It's also an offence to wilfully obstructs the free passage along a highway in any way without lawful authority and these events stop people from freely cycling along that road or turning their cars and lorries around as they are entitled to do.

How does having people standing within a blocked off road, one which is closed to motorised traffic but accessible to cyclists and pedestrians stop people turning round lorries????





Abe_froeman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's also an offence to wilfully obstructs the

> free passage along a highway in any way without

> lawful authority and these events stop people from

> freely cycling along that road or turning their

> cars and lorries around as they are entitled to

> do.

slarti b Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You seem to have no idea we are in the middle of a

> pandemic. Look at this and tell me if it complies

> with Govt guidelines and rules about public

> events.

>

> https://twitter.com/DulwichSquare/status/129223098

> 1877891074




That is the funniest thread I have seen in a while.


Sadly, but unsuprisingly, the labour councillors are all on board,

so I cannot see turning to them for help being of any help at all.

Despite constantly commenting, it appears you?ve never been to the closure. It?s blocked off at calton, dulwich village and court. It?s not a turning circle. The part where they are standing is no motorised vehicles!





Abe_froeman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If you wanted to drive your lorry down CAlton

> Avenue, pick up an ice cream and then turn around

> and go home again, it would bee rather tricky with

> all these people sitting on deckchairs int he

> middle of the turning space

The ideas around streets are changing. If the street is a living space where people can do a mixture of things it is no longer simply a highway with parking space. I know this subject is highly charged and I don't want to add fuel to the fire. But it is worth imagining the way streets could change.


The idea of traffic 'evaporation' is well documented and worth believing in.


https://londonlivingstreets.com/2019/07/11/evaporating-traffic-impact-of-low-traffic-neighbourhoods-on-main-roads/

andrewc Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The ideas around streets are changing. If the

> street is a living space where people can do a

> mixture of things it is no longer simply a highway

> with parking space. I know this subject is highly

> charged and I don't want to add fuel to the fire.

> But it is worth imagining the way streets could

> change.

>

> The idea of traffic 'evaporation' is well

> documented and worth believing in.

>

> https://londonlivingstreets.com/2019/07/11/evapora

> ting-traffic-impact-of-low-traffic-neighbourhoods-

> on-main-roads/



And anyone who studied geography will tell you when something evaporates it condenses and then falls as rain elsewhere....which is exactly what these closures cause....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I can't speak about other places but as someone who uses Mind in Forest Hill, these small studios are having a boom due to increased working from home.  Now I can work two days a week at home, I can use them at lunch time or early evening, it is a short walk from home so I can get changed and shower at home (so the studio does not need a big changing room or showers like a traditional gym),  whereas before Covid it would have a  been weekend only thing for me. I asume there are many like me so they can make a small space finacially viable. I am biased but Mind is great, it is a very inclusive woman friendly space, classes are very reasonable for instructor led classes, (there are different packages but you can get 10 for £100 if you oay in advance) and the fact there are very few bells and whistles keeps it affordable.   I prefer smaller studios as you don't want big classes for pilates and yoga as you need instructors to be able to see everyone and assess and adjust form for safety. 
    • I see a gap in the market and a stall in North Cross Road...
    • The lack of affordable housing is down to Thatcher's promoting sale of council properties. When I was working, I had to deal with many families/older folk/ disabled folk in inferior housing. The worst ones were ex council properties purchased by their tenants  with a very high discount who then sold on for a profit. The new owners frequently rented out at exorbitant prices and failed to maintain the properties. I remember a gentleman who needed to be visited by a district nurse daily becoming very upset as he rented a room in an ex council flat and shared kitchen and bathroom with 6 other people  (it was a 3 bed flat) the landlord did not allow visitors to the flat and this gut was frightened he would be evicted if the nurse visited daily. Unfortunately, the guy was re admitted to hospital and ended up in a care home as he could not receive medical help at home.   Private developers  are not keen on providing a larger percentage of 'social housing' as it dents their profits. Also a social rent is still around £200 plus a week
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...