Jump to content

Recommended Posts

using 'oh' as part of a phone number is fine, because everyone knows there are no letters in telnos, and it's quicker than saying zero. Only for (say) passport nos or other strings which have potentioal of zeros AND 'ohs' do we need to be so specific.

technically it's arguable, but not for real-world usage. In IT, I can see the point also.


"Let me be honest with you"

(translates to "normally I'm dishonest when speaking with you")

Whilst I'm with you on superfluity ed_pete, much fruit is picked green, stuffed in a chiller on a ship and then bombarded with ethylene to ripen it just before it hits the market.


Some fruits do only ripen on the tree, so in that case it would be unnecessary.


I mused to a colleague whether fruit that ripened on my desk was really just rotten fruit, started investigating ripening and was very soon lost as I last did chemistry a looooong time ago.


http://www.chemistry-blog.com/2011/10/12/fruit-ripening-how-does-it-work/

Wow - you must be a hoot to work with EP. ;-)


Tautology is quite annoying. The hoi-polloi gets me every time as does "free gift". Also "safe-haven".


But these are often so ingrained we rarely stop to consider them.


And they are of miniscule annoyance compared to "centred around". A pox on your house!

Oh and sandwiches, there probably is a legal definition, but the main reason places like Pret want to make themselves stand out is that most sandwiches are a few days old by the time you eat them, if bought pre-packed.


So for man's greatest luncheon, I'm not sure the wording is superfluous.

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> david_carnell Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > Tautology is quite annoying.

>

> And what of pleonasm, good sir?

>

> And Pibe, I've toured the Kettle Chips factory -

> they are a little more more hand cooked than that.


Pleonasm has its place. Mainly in literature and speeches for rhetorical effect. Shakespeare and Beckett did it, Churchill did it. That'll satisfy me.

As a blanket rule that doesn't really work, Eric Gill shagged his dog for instance, if it was good enough for him ;-)


I get your point though 'something done well is good' is something of a superfluity in itself.

Plenoasty is a modern day scourge, a bit of discipline in writing these days would be most welcome.


I had to precis a 10 page document by Accenture to help my wife prepare for an interview a couple of days ago and I only found 4 salient points, the rest was just waffle.

Gill having sex with his dog was the least of his problems!


And it wasn't stated as a blanket rule to adhere to, merely an example of when repetition and redundancy can actually be used skillfully for rhetorical purposes.


Obviously in corporate documents, like the one you mention, it should be removed and the authors birched.


Working in a press office in the civil service, I often have to decifer policy documents for their salient points to write a press release. My brain tends to ache by the end. Stakeholder? No, that was soooo 1997. Partner? No - has liberal connotations. Horizontal interest group? Ah, winner. We like those. Yeah, except no one has the foggiest feck what you're talking about.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm fairly sure everyone engaged with this topic will have received this email yesterday, but just in case... "To whom it may concern, We are reaching out to invite you to our upcoming Residents & Stakeholder Drop In Sessions for Gala 2026. We are hosting two drop-in style sessions (one virtual, and one in person) to facilitate more in depth conversations, allowing us to run through our plans for 2026 and to discuss how we are going to address your feedback. We look forward to meeting you in person or online and discussing our event plans for both Gala and On The Rye Festival in more detail. Evening Session (IN PERSON): Time: 6:30 PM - 8:00 PM Date: Wednesday 11th February Location: Watson's General Telegraph Lunchtime Session (VIRTUAL MEETING): Time: 12:00 PM - 2:00 PM Date: Friday 13th February We are offering 15 minute slots to speak directly with us in a virtual meeting. Please confirm your availability within this drop in period and we will confirm a time with you. You will then be sent a link directly to join the virtual session. If you would like to attend, please respond with: Your name: Your address: If you will be attending the virtual or in person meeting: Your availability for a meeting time online (if applicable): If you have any access needs so we can accommodate: We really appreciate your feedback and taking the time to attend our engagement meetings. Yours sincerely, Community Team | GALA Festival"
    • Many thanks to the woman who looked after our old deaf Miniature Schnauzer who got separated from us in the park this morning. And thank you to the man who alerted us . My husband is very relieved and grateful. If any one knows who these people are please say thank you as he didn't get their names. 
    • why do we think we have the right for the elected local council to be transparent?
    • Granted Shoreditch is still London, but given that the council & organisers main argument for the festival is that it is a local event, for local people (to use your metaphor), there's surprisingly little to back this up. As Blah Blah informatively points out, this is now just a commercial venture with no local connection. Our park is regarded by them as an asset that they've paid to use & abuse. There's never been any details provided of where the attendees are from, but it's still trotted out as a benefit to the local community.  There's never been any details provided of any increase in sales for local businesses, but it's still trotted out as a benefit to the local community.  There's promises of "opportunities" for local people & traders to work at the festival, but, again, no figures to back this up. And lastly, the fee for the whole thing goes 100% to running the Events dept, and the dozens of free events that no-one seems able to identify, and, yes, you guessed it - no details provided for by the council. So again, no tangible benefit for the residents of the area.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...