Jump to content

Can you recommend an Estate Agent?


mearly

Recommended Posts

Alistair,


I appreciate your efforts to market the property but the bad taste lingers, it has delayed our sale by weeks.


Such was the lack of proactivity that the concept of reducing the price, or indeed doing anything differently to try to stimulate viewings, was at no point suggested by the KFH team.


We were forced to reduce the price as a result of KFH's overvaluation.


Best regards


Chris

Spencer Kennedy gave me a bottle of chilled champagne when I bought through them. Real French stuff too. None of your Aldi Lambrusco. In my small, low rent, easily influenced mind, that makes them clearly the best estate agent in the area. For now anyway.


Currently I'm having a very good selling/regular comms/on the ball experience with the team Winkworth. When the market fell off a cliff in 2008-2010 and others packed up, Winkworth with their slightly posher name, serif font and dynamic duo carried on. Often til 9pm some nights eating custard creams, jam sandwiches and making calls. They get maximum business respect for their recessionary work ethic. Haart on the other hand only had digestives and Kia-Ora so they're no good.


Foxtons are stuck in the 1980's with their coke, Perrier and giant all glass c&^! aquarium. Despite that, their equally loathsome private equity backers stand to make a profit on their upcoming IPO - but not from East Dulwich. Their current 0% deal is only on in desperation at their poorest performing branches. Which tells you all you need to know.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
    • I guess its the thing these days to demonstrate an attitude, in this instance seemingly of the negative kind, instead of taking pride in your work and have standards then 🤷‍♀️
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...