Jump to content

Recommended Posts

We got our son and daughter micro scooters for their 2nd birthdays - if memory serves, the boy picked it up quickly, and the girl at two and a half is only just getting the hang of it. I kind of regret never having got either of them a pedal trike, so maybe get a cheap one for the birthday and a micro scooter for Christmas?


Steve. (Mr LizzieF)

My daughter had both for her 2nd birthday (not both from us !) . The trike was never a real goer except in the back garden whereas she is still whizzing around on her scooter 2 years later. I have seen plenty of 2 year olds using them, slowly at first of course!! She got the hang of it pretty quickly and is not exactly a coordinated child. But no doubt your daughter will love whatever you choose!

susypx

I have twins who turned 2 in august, one is brilliant on the scooter and can keep up with her 4.5 year old brother.... the other is fairly rubbish at it if I'm honest but she's enjoying it! We never got a lot of use out of our trike with our eldest but the scooters are brilliant. Not all kids can manage it at 2 though, I think my eldest was nearly 3 before he 'got it'.
I'd go for the scooter, or a balance bike rather than a trike. Most kids find riding a pedal bike easy if they've had a balance bike first. Both my kids got on reasonably well with a micro scooter from about 2, so that would be my pick. Be prepared to chase after her!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Try oru space with Michelle. Think it runs on Wednesday evenings. She’s great. I also think the new casa core place does one but haven’t tried it. 
    • The OP is simply asking a question? and as a few people on this forum seem to know about every subject posted 🙄 maybe that was the reason for asking?😉 It's been such a dry summer so far, maybe "some trees" are becoming less stable due to lack of rainfall and needed some safety pollarding work?  (another question🙂)  
    • No offence, but why not start from the assumption that the trees team in Southwark Council know what they're doing because it's their job and aren't a bunch of ecogenocidal maniacs looking for excuses to cut back trees? I'm not an expert but if they're not coming back to cut down the rest, then it seems like pollarding. It always looks ugly at first. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pollarding
    • It looks like the branches overhung the entry way to the toilets. There's a lot of paranoia about at the moment about branch drop after a couple of sad accidents which have happened recently where beloved trees were propped up but still dropped branches then everyone jumps up and asks why nothing was done before. You might remember when the massive oak fell over in Peckham Rye by the skating park, thankfully no one was hurt.  I've noticed notices in almost every public space warning about branch drop and some trees have had barriers put underneath them etc. These things seem to come into vogue and then pass again.  I expect local authorities in their regular meetings have all been discussing their risk exposure and issues of corporate responsibility etc....and someone will have been assigned the task (and responsibility) of making everything all right. Perhaps this tree fell victim to that. I doubt there is malice and something they feel is safer/appropriate etc will take its place in due course.  I don't doubt cutting it back is an over reaction but at the same time we all bellow at them when things go wrong so there is a difficult path to navigate. It was a chestnut by the look of it, so not particularly rare I have plenty of saplings growing through my beds if they wish to replace like for like.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...