Jump to content

Recommended Posts

A car appears to have gone South West from Grove Hill Road over the lights and then "missed" its entry into Champion Hill only to go half way through a wall on the corner of Grove Lane. To me that's what appears to have happened - must've been going at some pelt to get the car that far through the wall. So DKH northbound closed for a while
Traffic is u-turning at the lights and coming back down grove vale -so extremely heavy all along grove vale to goose green roundabout / lordship lane and then onto ED Grove. Busses diverted along ED Grove - also busy along Calton / Townley etc as Waze adapts routes to allow for this.
As of 20 minutes ago the stretch was still closed, even with no signs of any debris or people in the road, just a car bonnet-shaped hole in a brick wall. Better open it soon or Southwark CPZ planners will claim it's a rewilding project.

richard tudor Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> How did the car hit the wall without taking out

> the signpost?



Presumably it was heading north and hit the wall at an angle.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I am struggling to understand how Green policies translate to local issues? The Southwark Greens leaflet I received reads like a general wish list but is not locally specific. I know the same can be said of other political parties. What specifically are Greens plans for housing, protecting local parks, council tax, transport and roads/ pavement upkeep, CPZ/LTNs?
    • Politician's moving from one party to another, especially when local is worth discussing. You have to wonder what they are driven by, and particularly in this instance, as their new party is moving in strange directions.
    • To be fair to Sue, she doesn't have to explain or justify why she supports or wants to vote for any party. That is the same for everyone. We are free to decide which party best reflects what we think is important to us. Discussing the stances/ policies of parties, in a general discussion, can be done without targetting anyone commenting here. Politics is just a point of view at the end of the day.  Different things are important to different people, often for very valid reasons. Let's be respectful of that.  My opinion is that if say the Labour Party wants to understand why it is losing supporters to the Greens, it needs to listen to and understand the reasons why. That theme has been explored in this thread a little through the discussion around councillor McAsh. The same is true of the Tories losing support to Reform and the Libdems. Let's not also assume that every member of every party is completely on board with every policy of the leadership of that party either. You only have to look at how backbenchers have forced u-turns from Starmer's cabinet on things like Welfare Reform and WFA to see that. 
    • As a compromise I'd be prepared to trial the reintroduction of dog licensing. The annual licence fee would be the same as road tax for Range Rover (same carbon emissions as a dog) and would require owners to pass a responsible dog ownership exam, the dogs would need to pass training and a behaviour exam and their DNA would need to be kept on record to identify the owners who leave dog shit all over the pavements, so that they can be jailed.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...