Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello, I am a newbie cyclist. I?ve been using Burgess Park to get to work and back. Now it?s getting dark, how late do more experienced cyclists feel comfortable with when cycling home through this park at night. Feels like it may get very quiet in winter. Any advice/tips appreciated. Thank you!
Many years back someone on the forum posted that someone had tried to knock him off his bike with a scaffolding pole, after dark in Burgess. Since then I?ve avoided cycling through any park or on any off road route when it?s dark. I?d rather stick to the roads where I can be seen.
That was what sprung to mind for me too - it put me off but i think that was on the canal path rather than the main park. I think that from talking to friends - if you're doing it at 'peak hours' and there are lots of cyclists around people seem to feel ok with it (though do peak hours exist any more?) but otherwise maybe its worth planning an alternative route. I think i'd feel ok with going through the part of the park on CS17 but maybe not through the underpass and over to the canal path.
I used to commute that way. It's possibly irrational but I don't really like to go through Burgess Park at night alone. In normal times, it's quite easy to bunch up with other cyclists (esp if you're heading south and get caught at the traffic lights by the BMX club).

Gubodge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Many years back someone on the forum posted that

> someone had tried to knock him off his bike with a

> scaffolding pole, after dark in Burgess. Since

> then I?ve avoided cycling through any park or on

> any off road route when it?s dark. I?d rather

> stick to the roads where I can be seen.



Re the the above, look what I've found.


https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,15153,15196#msg-15196


Post from Pierre about the scaffold pole and Burgess Park

I'm with Blah Blah - I cycle the Surrey Canal Path to and from work and take a view on how many people are around - whether it's early morning in the light or later at night in the dark. Trust your instincts and if you don't feel comfortable, stick to the roads.
Thanks for the replies. I was about to hit the park for the first time in dark at 7:30pm last night, coming off Albany Road at Portland Street. It looked v dark and quiet so kept going along Albany Road and did a dog leg round to join at the other side. Replies noted. Think I'm going to add a few more minutes by doing it this way.

Burgess park has been my commute route for the past 6 years or so. I had a couple of unpleasant experiences early on when it was dark and also its really badly lit and with folk wearing black jackets/jeans, the black bins and dark park furniture you have to be on the alert not to cycle into someone/something!

Now, when its dark enough to have my main front beam on I just cycle around the park instead - probably takes less time as I can go faster on the road with less obstacles....

I cycled through Burgess Park for years. Not sure why as there were more direct cycle routes. Never had any problems but I think your attitude to risk, and how much of a target you may be (or feel) is key. I never went through Peckham as I wrongly believed that it was dangerous. I switched to the canal path almost 20 years ago and never had any real problems. Occasionally a group of lads, but they'd never take any interest in me.


The positive on the canal path is there will always be someone coming up there who will help.


I remember stories of cyclists going up hills and being pushed off, and their bikes nicked by someone who simply cycled down the hill. I think this was an urban myth. And mopeds coming up to you and pushing you off, or nicking your bag. I understand that this was a North London thing (it's grim up North....)


Of course most of my bother is with motorists. But that doesn't happen very often. Most people are good.

teddyboy23 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Don't be a whimp if you cycle through the park

> doing 30 to 40 miles per hour .screaming

> obscenities at everyone you see.and waving a

> baseball bat above your head your be fine



This is true. The odds of two unrelated violent nutters being in the same place at the same time are very low, so if you are the violent nutter, it almost guarantees that you won't bump into another one. It's just simple statistics, really!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I have sympathy with any voter, anyone, who having witnessed the last 14 years and then Labour in the last year and wonders just how can things be this bad  unless a) they voted for brexit b) voted Tory after 2010 c) is thinking of voting reform  because anyone who thinks reform won’t make things a thousand times worse after voting for the previous?  It is they who are the problem.  They are the reason the country is in the doldrums with an embarrassingly-timid Labour government  Specifically Chris mason - a not very bright right leaning stooge - large part of why bbc news has become grok-level slop  
    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...