Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello, I am a newbie cyclist. I?ve been using Burgess Park to get to work and back. Now it?s getting dark, how late do more experienced cyclists feel comfortable with when cycling home through this park at night. Feels like it may get very quiet in winter. Any advice/tips appreciated. Thank you!
Many years back someone on the forum posted that someone had tried to knock him off his bike with a scaffolding pole, after dark in Burgess. Since then I?ve avoided cycling through any park or on any off road route when it?s dark. I?d rather stick to the roads where I can be seen.
That was what sprung to mind for me too - it put me off but i think that was on the canal path rather than the main park. I think that from talking to friends - if you're doing it at 'peak hours' and there are lots of cyclists around people seem to feel ok with it (though do peak hours exist any more?) but otherwise maybe its worth planning an alternative route. I think i'd feel ok with going through the part of the park on CS17 but maybe not through the underpass and over to the canal path.
I used to commute that way. It's possibly irrational but I don't really like to go through Burgess Park at night alone. In normal times, it's quite easy to bunch up with other cyclists (esp if you're heading south and get caught at the traffic lights by the BMX club).

Gubodge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Many years back someone on the forum posted that

> someone had tried to knock him off his bike with a

> scaffolding pole, after dark in Burgess. Since

> then I?ve avoided cycling through any park or on

> any off road route when it?s dark. I?d rather

> stick to the roads where I can be seen.



Re the the above, look what I've found.


https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,15153,15196#msg-15196


Post from Pierre about the scaffold pole and Burgess Park

I'm with Blah Blah - I cycle the Surrey Canal Path to and from work and take a view on how many people are around - whether it's early morning in the light or later at night in the dark. Trust your instincts and if you don't feel comfortable, stick to the roads.
Thanks for the replies. I was about to hit the park for the first time in dark at 7:30pm last night, coming off Albany Road at Portland Street. It looked v dark and quiet so kept going along Albany Road and did a dog leg round to join at the other side. Replies noted. Think I'm going to add a few more minutes by doing it this way.

Burgess park has been my commute route for the past 6 years or so. I had a couple of unpleasant experiences early on when it was dark and also its really badly lit and with folk wearing black jackets/jeans, the black bins and dark park furniture you have to be on the alert not to cycle into someone/something!

Now, when its dark enough to have my main front beam on I just cycle around the park instead - probably takes less time as I can go faster on the road with less obstacles....

I cycled through Burgess Park for years. Not sure why as there were more direct cycle routes. Never had any problems but I think your attitude to risk, and how much of a target you may be (or feel) is key. I never went through Peckham as I wrongly believed that it was dangerous. I switched to the canal path almost 20 years ago and never had any real problems. Occasionally a group of lads, but they'd never take any interest in me.


The positive on the canal path is there will always be someone coming up there who will help.


I remember stories of cyclists going up hills and being pushed off, and their bikes nicked by someone who simply cycled down the hill. I think this was an urban myth. And mopeds coming up to you and pushing you off, or nicking your bag. I understand that this was a North London thing (it's grim up North....)


Of course most of my bother is with motorists. But that doesn't happen very often. Most people are good.

teddyboy23 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Don't be a whimp if you cycle through the park

> doing 30 to 40 miles per hour .screaming

> obscenities at everyone you see.and waving a

> baseball bat above your head your be fine



This is true. The odds of two unrelated violent nutters being in the same place at the same time are very low, so if you are the violent nutter, it almost guarantees that you won't bump into another one. It's just simple statistics, really!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
    • Ah, thanks,  it all comes flooding back. I've actually been to the Hastings shop, I'd forgotten all about it, along with her name! Didn't she (in between?)  take over what  was then The Magnolia, previously The Magdala, now The Lordship, with her then partner? Or is that some figment of my imagination?  In fact, didn't they transform it from The Magdala (much missed) to The Magnolia? With flowery wallpaper covering the front of the bar? Which reminds me of the pub's brief period after The Magnolia  as the ill-conceived and ill-fated The Patch.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...