Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Early report below which has attracted no interest!


But first, re: I told a cyclist to get some lights and he/she told me to fack off and mind my own business

I told a mother not to park on the double yellows/pavement outside a primary school and she told me to fack off and mind my own business.


Not all mothers are like that

Not all cyclist are like that - although I confess to at times embarassing myself.


Back to said docu:


Well I stayed in especially to watch tonight's BBC1 documentary.


One of last Saturday's broadsheets said that the Germans have one word for 'an annoying person' where we have about a 100. To use profanities as an example the f and s word can be used in a dozen ways from likable rogue, annoying but right, to evil and twisted. The German word translates as "needs a punch in the face". And the one German word was 100% appropriate for the 24 year old cyclist who featured for about 20 minutes. But this was supposed to be sensationalist programme so they had to get an arse in.


The rest was reasonably balanced and a bit emotional at times.


Just when I was saying you need some cyclist on cyclist action, up some popped. And then that it was short of pedestrain walking across cyclist (and ditto when cyclist runs over innocent pedestrain) up a couple of clips pop.


Lots of stuff to make me think that it was a good thing not to provoke motorist's for fear of road rage (or have an escape plan if you do). I got involved in three what should have been minor scirmishes in the 90s, pre helmet-cam and at a time when there were far less bikes on the road, yet came close to being punched, run over, stabbed or what-ever (a "sorry mate' would have been fine from the motorist).


The other thing is never never never try to cut through an arctic that is, or may, turn left, as that is "Good night Vienna".


It is a shame that that the BBC did not show both the campaign to get cyclists to see what it is like from a cab of a HGV, and ditto HGV drivers going out on a bike. TFL/GLA are doing a lot.


And irrespective of my moral high ground that I am a perfect cyclist, even I am tempering some of my behaviour; in part influenced by the good behaviour of most cyclists no matter the generalisms. {back to the new me}

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • We had a take-away from Aroma Lab last night. I was impressed, utterly delicious stir fried tofu and sweet and sour chicken. Generous portions too… will definitely make a habit of eating their home-cooked food. 
    • I think that's a big assumption.  Many people vote for the candidate precisely because they are a member of a particular party and represent that party's policiies.  I personally didn't know who McAsh was in the last election, but I knew what party he represented.  When politicians don't act "morally" what are we to think of them and their motivations? But I think there will be people who want to vote Labour, don't know that McAsh has defected and accidentally vote Green precisely because they do vote for the name.  Yes, you could say they need to read the ballot paper more carefully but it's possible to see one thing and not notice another.
    • Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...