Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I picked up a leaflet at London Bridge station last week with details of all the exciting improvements that lie in store for us, in the run up to the "new" station being completed in 2018!


One of these is that from May 2013 platforms 14-16 are going to be taken out of service for a couple of years. I guess that means that they'll be down to only 13 platforms.


Fewer platforms seems likley to mean fewer trains. Does anyone know if that's the case and if so can we expect a reduced service into London Bridge station?

Those are the platforms for ED trains (plus 13) so I'd also be interested in any new schedule plans for that period.

14/15/16 platform are at end of the station - maybe they're renovating/rebuilding the offices at that end of the station ?

Overhaul is going good so far - makes me realise how used I'd got to the place being such a shithole.

The new timetable starting 9 December will see more evenly spaced trains East Dulwich to London Bridge but the same overall number:


7.09,20,30,40,50

8.00,10,21,30,40,51

9.01


as opposed to current:

7.05,15,29,34,46,57

8.04,15,27,33,45

9.00


Hopefully when all the London Bridge works are finished they can then provide more trains on our line which from my experience very over crowded. But I'm hot holding my breath as the results of all the works will see exactly the same number of platforms - currently 6 through and 9 terminating changes to 9 through and 6 terminating.

Thnks for that information James, but what's going to happen to the service to and from London Bridge as from May 2013 when platorms 14-16 close and there will be 3 fewer platforms available for trains? What's more, these 3 platforms are of course those most used by trains passing through East Dulwich.


Plus, for how long are they going to be out of service? The leaflet I picked up was silent on this - but implied that it would be for a long time!


I fear a reduced service to and from London Bridge, for quite some time.

"May 2013


"Platforms 14, 15 & 16 at London Bridge close to enable redevelopment work. This means platform changes and the retiming of some Southern train services.


"Spring 2014


"The first two redeveloped platforms open at London Bridge (14 & 15) with new longer canopies to protect passengers from the rain."


[ copied from http://www.thameslinkprogramme.co.uk/about#keydates ]

katgod Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No trains Lb to cx for 2 years is a big concern.

> Don't think the Ell will help with that at all.


It's a year for each station. Charing Cross in 2014/15 and Cannon Street 2015/16.


The ELL will provide alternative connections to continue your journey, more likely from Canada Water using the Jubilee line which will connect with Southwark for Waterloo East and Waterloo for the Northern/Bakerloo to Embankment and Charing Cross.


As seen with the extension to Forest Hill and Honor Oak Park, passengers changed their travelling patterns to Canada Water instead for the easier tube connection into Central London.


London Bridge doesn't need all the passenger traffic during the refurbishment works, so the extension will help to relieve passenger flows already from the Sydenham line and soon from the SLL.

Bic Basher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> katgod Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > No trains Lb to cx for 2 years is a big

> concern.

> > Don't think the Ell will help with that at all.

>

> It's a year for each station. Charing Cross in

> 2014/15 and Cannon Street 2015/16.

>

> The ELL will provide alternative connections to

> continue your journey, more likely from Canada

> Water using the Jubilee line which will connect

> with Southwark for Waterloo East and Waterloo for

> the Northern/Bakerloo to Embankment and Charing

> Cross.

>

> As seen with the extension to Forest Hill and

> Honor Oak Park, passengers changed their

> travelling patterns to Canada Water instead for

> the easier tube connection into Central London.


The ELL isn't the best alternative for people travelling from East Dulwich station. It makes more sense to travel to London Bridge as normal and then take the tube (e.g. jubilee line or district) instead of the CX link.

GLA Assembly Member Caroline Pidgeon has forwarded a Network Rail email that states:


"

At this stage, we don?t know the exact changes to service patterns. The only line we know changing on the Southern side is the removal of the South London Line. The rest will see some re-timing, re-platforming and some small incremental changes to individual services. This will all be done through the standard timetable changes in May and December. These small changes will be covered by increasing the length of certain trains and reorganising the way Southern runs its drivers and station operations to improve turn around times and dispatching. Unfortunately we can?t say for sure which train services see some small losses in trains as of yet, these will be worked out with the timetable changes.


The thinking behind the recent communications push is to get passengers thinking about these expected changes and share the info we have with them. We?re advising passengers to sign up to email alerts through the Thameslink website www.thameslinkprogramme.co.uk so we can keep them informed once details of service patterns are confirmed. They can also email us at [email protected] Besides these communication channels, we will be organising further engagement activities with commuters like the current roadshow when the service changes are confirmed.

"


A further complication is a Judicial Review of the London Bridge Planning Application:

http://www.out-law.com/en/articles/2012/june/london-bridge-development-subject-to-high-court-challenge-by-community-group/

My hunch is it will win. Starting a JR is very risky unless you're sure you've a very strong case - costs can be awarded. If this JR is won then it should stop works as the Planning Application process would have to be undertaken again.

Personally I think the proposal for London Bridge are rubbish and rail users should have a better scheme.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thankyou so so much tam. Your def a at angle. I was so so worried. Your a good man, we need more like your good self in the world.  Thankyou for the bottom of my heart. Pepper is pleased to be back
    • I have your cat , she’s fine , you can phone me on 07883 065 076 , I’m still up and can bring her to you now (1.15 AM Sunday) if not tonight then tomorrow afternoon or evening ? I’ve DM’d you in here as well 
    • This week's edition of The Briefing Room I found really useful and impressively informative on the training aspect.  David Aaronovitch has come a long way since his University Challenge day. 😉  It's available to hear online or download as mp3. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m002n7wv In a few days time resident doctors -who used to be known as junior doctors - were meant to be going on strike. This would be the 14th strike by the doctors’ union since March 2023. The ostensible reason was pay but now the dispute may be over without more increases to salary levels. The Government has instead made an offer to do something about the other big issue for early career doctors - working conditions and specialist training places. David Aaronovitch and guests discuss what's going on and ask what the problem is with the way we in Britain train our doctors? Guests: Hugh Pym, BBC Health Editor Sir Andrew Goddard, Consultant Gastroenterologist Professor Martin McKee, Professor of European Public Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Mark Dayan, Policy Analyst, Nuffield Trust. Presenter: David Aaronovitch Producers: Caroline Bayley, Kirsteen Knight, Cordelia Hemming Production Co-ordinator: Maria Ogundele Sound Engineers: Michael Regaard, Gareth Jones Editor: Richard Vadon  
    • That was one that the BBC seem to have lost track of.  But they do still have quite a few. These are some in their 60s archive. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m0028zp6
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...