Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi there


We're thinking of ducks or DPL early years. Both are great schools and we're aware of the 7+ exam at Ducks to Dulwich College junior school and the 11+ / 13+ at DPL to go onto to other settings.


We're out of area so curious if people have children at either of these schools and what the pros / cons are. We're both working parents.


Thanks

  • 3 weeks later...

Our kids are at Ducks. It?s a lovely school. Good teacher engagement, nice outdoor space. Can?t comment on DPL but Ducks is pretty much Montessori in all but name, all learning through play, not very pressured. They get a bit of homework but no one checks if they?ve done it. That works for some, wouldn?t for others.


Only negative i can think of is a lot of girls leave as they can?t stay past 7, so by year 3 it?s mostly boys.


Happy if you want to DM with any questions.

  • 2 months later...
Ours are at Ducks and it's an absolutely lovely place. Incredibly nurturing. The staff are so loving and committed. It's also in the nicest surroundings you could imagine for a London school. I couldn't fault it. DPL also has a fantastic reputation , so probably it's a choice between 2 great things.

Hi


Sorry to jump on a thread from last year. We are moving to dulwich shortly so I was wondering how you got on with your choice OP? And whether you got a space? I have got myself worried that due to us moving into the area we are to late to get a space for our kiddo who is turning 3 next academic year

- we?d need a nursery space from Sept.


To the lovely people responding to OP, when did you have to register your children by to get a space at DUCKS please?


Thanks

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...