Jump to content

Recommended Posts

A leaflet titled "Transport for London bailout facts - Important message for Londoners - Why TfL needs a second bailout and how it will affect you". The fonts, colours and layout are lookalikes to TfL's own corporate style (although not exactly the same). The leaflet (in brief) describes how Khan is doing a terrible job and how TfL's woes are mostly due to Khan's mismanagement and not Covid. It suggests you visit the website www.tflbailoutfacts.com


But the leaflet isn't published by TfL. In fact, it doesn't say which organisation is responsible for it at all. In an epic fail, the website doesn't work (not just for me - I checked on IsItDown). Only if you look at the tiny print at the bottom of the back cover will you see the message that the leaflet is "promoted by Kerry Halfpenny on behalf of Shaun Bailey". And only if you Google their names to find out who they are, you discover they're an election agent for the Tories and a candidate for Mayor.


All in all, pretty embarrassing. It sets a sad tone for the beginning of the campaign. It just makes it look like:


- the Tory brand is so toxic not even their candidate wants to use it

- the Tory team is happy to mislead voters and suggest their election material is published by TfL when it's not

- the Tory candidate is so inept he can't even sort out a website before he starts promoting


https://www.isitdownrightnow.com/tflbailoutfacts.com.html

Is that legal? Surely it is a classic case of 'Passing off' (an Internet explanation is 'happens when someone deliberately or unintentionally passes off their goods or services as those belonging to another party. This action of misrepresentation often damages the goodwill of a person or business, causing financial or reputational damage')I would think a complaint to the electoral Commission in order.

https://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/sites/default/files/2020-02/GLA%20Part%204%20-%20The%20campaign.pdf


Here?s the electoral commission stuff which covers the ?imprint? requirement ie the wording you refer to but they do say that they don?t otherwise regulate campaign content and can?t comment on its legality.


Don?t think it would be passing off territory as there?s no element of passing off the promoter?s services as tfl goods/ services.


Looks like the Electoral Commission are concerned but probably legal?


https://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/who-we-are-and-what-we-do/elections-and-referendums/past-elections-and-referendums/uk-general-elections/report-2019-uk-parliamentary-general-election-was-well-run/depth-campaigning-2019-uk-parliamentary-general-election#misleading-campaign-techniques-risk-undermining-voters?-trust

legalalien Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Don?t like the sound of it. Can you post a pic?



I took a couple on my phone but I can't work out how to make the image size small enough to post! I'll try to do it later on my big computer.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Lloyd Weber and Cilla Black were supposed to leave when Blair got in, but didn't
    • You can't have zero tolerance unless you live in a fascist/police state.  Sadly it is something you have to accept in a democracy.  There has always been crime, even in North Korea, the Soviet bloc, Nazi Germany, Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge etc.   The discussion point is how big a police force we need and capabilities, punishment, and building communities.  And how much we are prepared to pay in extra taxation. Even in the good (economic) times there is crime.  And crime under both Labour and Tory governments. I do not accept that phone thefts and parcel thefts are just statistics.  Police have to prioritise what they do, we might not agree with it.  And most criminals are multi-tasking, moving to where the best return is considering the risk of being caught. And there has to be a market, someone somewhere needs to buy a stolen product (I never buy off Gumtree). A starting point would be to decriminalise all illegal drugs, but that is definitely for a separate Lounge conversation, interesting discussion paper here: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/105520/1/A. Stevens - In defence of the decriminalisation of drug possession in the uk - PPDF.pdf Did you watch any of the series of Peaky Blinders?  This was a very popular series that glorified gang crime and violence.  Funny (ironic) that may enjoy films and TV that does this.  Although only the first series had any historical accuracy in it,  Criminal gangs were around before and ever since.    
    • Ah the oldest cliche in the book   ”I would leave if…”   but you wouldn’t leave if farage was prime minister ?
    • It seems we have to accept a certain level of crime as normal now… phone thefts, car thefts, parcels stolen from doorsteps…. they are just recorded as statistics.  When it’s invasive ( numerous home invasions in my street recently), one reported on the forum recently, Evri delivery had his car stolen, the man attacked in PRP a couple of weeks ago, reports of violent and threatening youths also in PRP… it goes on and on.  And now this poor woman brutally assaulted in daylight on a busy street. NONE of this is acceptable. There should be ZERO tolerance for such criminal acts. There is no denying the police have too much to deal with and not enough resources. It’s disgusting. It’s a misappropriation of public funds. More should be invested on our police force.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...