Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello!


I will be moving to SE22 in December and I?m finding it difficult to understand if I am eligible for a residents parking permit. Southwark website is not helpful and just points me in a direction of planning permission.


Any pointers in how I can find out would be a great help!

If you're west of LL, you'll probably get one. If you're east you won't.

They've done a bang up job of dividing the area right into two.


That and created havoc with their closing of a dozen roads in a child-like experiment to see what happens when you halve the available space for traffic flow. And after they inexplicably carpeted the area with unnecessary yellow lines to reduce parking spaces by 10%.


Why would Southwark have a user-friendly website when they are clearly the community's sworn enemy?


Good luck living here.

I do find it slightly disconcerting that reps of Southwark Cycling have such intimate knowledge of the ins and outs of recently introduced CPZs in the area. It does give the impression that they have somehow been party to stuff that mere residents have not been.

That?s because they have. The council?s policy is to consult disability and cycling groups on traffic management orders that affect them. Choosing one at random (I just put CPZ into the search engine and this came up), the description of the consultation process for the Croxted CPZ is:



?12. Notice was also given to non-statutory consultees including: Transport for London, Southwark Disablement Association, Southwark Disability Forum, Southwark Cyclists, Living Streets and London Travel Watch.?


Policy at https://www.southwark.gov.uk/transport-and-roads/traffic-orders-licensing-strategies-and-regulation/traffic-management-orders?chapter=2. Note that SC also seem to be consulted on relevant experimental orders where no advance public consultation is required eg http://moderngov.southwark.gov.uk/documents/s91051/APPENDIX%201%20PECKHAM%20RYE.pdf




first mate Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I do find it slightly disconcerting that reps of

> Southwark Cycling have such intimate knowledge of

> the ins and outs of recently introduced CPZs in

> the area. It does give the impression that they

> have somehow been party to stuff that mere

> residents have not been.

But other relevant stakeholders like businesses or emergency services not consulted from the start?


legalalien Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That?s because they have. The council?s policy is

> to consult disability and cycling groups on

> traffic management orders that affect them.

> Choosing one at random (I just put CPZ into the

> search engine and this came up), the description

> of the consultation process for the Croxted CPZ

> is:

>

>

> ?12. Notice was also given to non-statutory

> consultees including: Transport for London,

> Southwark Disablement Association, Southwark

> Disability Forum, Southwark Cyclists, Living

> Streets and London Travel Watch.?

>

> Policy at

> https://www.southwark.gov.uk/transport-and-roads/t

> raffic-orders-licensing-strategies-and-regulation/

> traffic-management-orders?chapter=2. Note that SC

> also seem to be consulted on relevant experimental

> orders where no advance public consultation is

> required eg

> http://moderngov.southwark.gov.uk/documents/s91051

> /APPENDIX%201%20PECKHAM%20RYE.pdf

>

>

>

> first mate Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I do find it slightly disconcerting that reps

> of

> > Southwark Cycling have such intimate knowledge

> of

> > the ins and outs of recently introduced CPZs in

> > the area. It does give the impression that they

> > have somehow been party to stuff that mere

> > residents have not been.

Oh come on - surely its all a massive conspiracy and not just google!


NoahLxn - where are you moving to in ED? If its a street that has a CPZ then you need one and are eligible - if its not you might not need one and might not be eligible. There are some adjacent roads who are not covered by the CPZ but eligible to buy permits. This is all publicly available and not part of any special info I have ;-)



Sally Eva Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I googled southwark resident parking. The top

> result is the link I posted.

Conspiracy :). Not at all. Southwark choose to consult Southwark Cyclists, presumably so they can get their views

(although if there is a conspiracy, take their instructions!). Rather than complain about that, better to request they consult other groups as a matter of course eg residents associations, or maybe we should ask them to post on local bulletin boards like this? An RSS feed? We want more transparency, not less - I think so anyway.


On that note, the Southwark Cyclists AGM is on next week (online) and open to all...


https://southwarkcyclists.org.uk/events/southwark-cyclists-agm/

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Would wholeheartedly recommend Aria. Quality work, very responsive, lovely guy as well. 
    • A positive update from Southwark Council - “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.“  
    • A solicitor is acting as the executor for our late Aunt's will.  He only communicates by letter which is greatly lengthening the process.  The vast majority of legal people deal by modern means - the Electronic Communications Act that allows for much, if not all of these means is now 25 years old.   Any views and advice out there? In fuller detail: The value of the estate is not high.  There are a number of beneficiaries including one in the US.  It has taken almost three years and there is no end in sight.  The estate (house) is now damp, mouldy and wall paper falling off the wall. The solicitor is hostile, has threatened beneficiaries the police (which would just waste the police's time), and will not engage constructively. He only communicates by letter.  These are poorly written, curt or even hostile, in a language from the middle of last century, he clearly is typing these himself probably on a type writer.  Of course with every letter he makes more money. We've taken the first steps to complain either through the ombudsman and/or the SRA.  We have taken legal advice a couple of times, which of course isn't cheap, and were told that his behaviour is shocking and we'd be in our right to have him removed through the courts. But.... we just want him to get on with executing the will, primarily selling the house. However he refuses to use any other form of communication but letter.  So writing to the beneficiary in the 'States can take a month to get a reply. And even in this country a week or more. Having worked with lawyers in the past I am aware that email, tele and video conferencing and even text and WhatApp are appropriate means for communication.  There could be an immediate response to his questions.   Help!        
    • Labour should be applauded for bringing in the Renter's Rights Act.  But so many of you are carried away with slagging them off. Married couples with busy lives sometimes forget who did what. On this occasion Mr Rachel Reeves was sorting out the rental agreement.  Ms Reeves was a bit flumoxed with all the grief/demonsing/witch hunts she is getting so forgot to check with her other half.   Not the first or last time this will happen with couples. (That's not having a go at the post above)
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...