Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello All,


I telephoned LB Southwark last week, and waited ages for their pest control line to be answered, finally got through to someone, to be advised there is now no option to report pests on the telephone no more, and this has to be reported online. I explained, the tenant was registered disabled and a wheelchair user, but the response was to still go online. I explained the person does not own a computer and has no access to go online, and the advice - find an internet cafe in the borough. The staff member ended up disconnecting the call. I thought Southwark looked after the old and vulnerable members of society, but this shows they don't. I completely understand, the council is strapped for cash, especially with covid, but i really don't agree with policies such as this, and Southwark don't seem to care.


Had another bad experience again. The tenant wanted a replacement fob because it had stopped working. Once again, called their number, ages again to answer, and told had to complete a form online. The council seems to keep its tenants at arms length these days, just not a happy bunny regarding the council righrt now :(.

Hi Trinidad,


Is the tenant you're supporting in Goose Green ward? If so, please message or email me details and I will look into it. Or if the tenant wants to contact me themselves they are welcome to call me. Details here: http://moderngov.southwark.gov.uk/mgUserInfo.aspx?UID=50001002


If they're not a Goose Green resident then you can find their councillor's contact details here (http://moderngov.southwark.gov.uk/mgFindMember.aspx). I am sure whoever is their councillor would be happy to help.


Best wishes

James

spider69 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You have more chance of winning the lottery than

> getting a response from a Cllrs. Personal

> experience.



That is very unfair. I've always found our councillors (and Helen Hayes, our MP) really helpful.

Unfortunately, the presumption of connectivity is something all organisations do now - the more they shift online the fewer people they need to employ to answer the phones.


On the whole I have also found councillors responsive and supportive when needed - they can just be, ahem, a little selective about some of the things they chose not to respond to.

Southwark is in the process of updating its strategy for communicating with ?customers? - it?s on the agenda for today?s cabinet meeting. The overall strategy is to move towards more digital channels but there is a clear commitment not to leave people behind: eg


 ?Commit to maintaining traditional service access (telephone and face to face) for those in our community unable to access digital services.?


The best person to contact with a general concern about unavailability of telephone services might be the cabinet member for Communities and Equalities, which is Alice Macdonald, [email protected].


Report here http://moderngov.southwark.gov.uk/documents/b50012437/Supplemental%20Agenda%20No.%201%20Tuesday%2008-Dec-2020%2011.00%20Cabinet.pdf?T=9. That report includes an equality analysis and specifically states this


?The council will ensure traditional customer access services will remain available, so that everyone has access to high quality services. The contact centre will continue to handle emergency requests, such as housing repairs emergencies and pest control.?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • "Mysterious owners" 😆  If only there was a powerful search engine at our fingertips to find out such deep secrets.        
    • It's the "due to commercial reasons" line again that is vexing. Last year it seemed, although there was a similar level of objection, that the reasons were commercial - Gala didn't appear entirely prepared to run 3 more events, or more likely didn't have sufficient interest from other promoters / organisers who could 'sub-let' the site as with Brockwell Park (I believe?). This year they appeared more organised, had another year to plan & prepare, to the extent they actually had names for two of the three new events which indicated to me that they had third party promoters / organisers in place.  So yes, it does make you wonder whether the repeated level of objection, combined with the impending elections, led to the council 'advising' that maybe they shelve it again? I'm afraid I can't see the whole extension application just being a ruse to guarantee permission for the 'regular' event. Gala are a commercial venture with ambition - every festival's business plan is to expand, expand, expand, year on year on year. Gala won't give up until they have taken over the whole park for a Summer of Raves, and the mysterious owners are on their yachts counting their ££££
    • Thanks for that. Maybe forthcoming elections have stymied the 7 day request? If Labour get back in, do we think GALA will try with greater success in 2027?
    • Better late than never, same obscure reason as previously for not going ahead with the extended plan... "Due to commercial reasons, the event organisers have withdrawn their application to hold a 7- day event over two weekends. The application has been revised to request the use of Peckham Rye Park to hold a 4-day event over one bank holiday weekend with the following schedule: • Onsite: Monday 11 May 2026 • GALA: Friday 22 – Sunday 24 May • On the Rye Festival: BH Monday 25 May • Off-site Sunday 31 May 2026 This is the same event programme that was delivered in 2025."  GALA 2026 consultation findings report 1519.pdf
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...