Jump to content

Recommended Posts

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think we are seeing the delayed result of the

> 'Eat Out to Help Out' Promotion.

> The 'Tenner Off' campaign .

>

> Local Restaurants were Rammed.. Social Distancing

> virtually non-existent..

>

> Foxy


So you think they Covid has a *14 week* incubation period? Ooookay then...


I mean, cases started during while hospitality was shut down during November, but whatever.


https://mobile.twitter.com/PeterBorgNeal/status/1339827633824083969/photo/1

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think we are seeing the delayed result of the

> 'Eat Out to Help Out' Promotion.

> The 'Tenner Off' campaign .

>

> Local Restaurants were Rammed.. Social Distancing

> virtually non-existent..

>

> Foxy



I say this with total respect for you foxy

Rollocks


Those promotions ended ages ago so whilst they may have aided a slight blip at the time, the inoculation period doesn't support your theory.


My personal theory is that the new variant could be effecting the young so the spread is occurring in a different way to before possibly via school children who bring it home but that's may not be what's actually happening


Hang on to your hats for today's 4pm briefing to see what they announce.

I suppose it's possible what started in August propagates through to a bigger increase than might have happened otherwise in November and December - that's what computer projections were devised to work out though.


It might be politically inconvenient to broadcast so will be released softly on Xmas eve if so :)


My thoughts are that actually social distancing may breed a new variant as only the variant that is most infectious can make the distance between people (when someone coughs outside the new variant might make it to a new host and is thus favoured). Of course that won't favour the killer variant so much (hopefully) - so more infectious, less/similar mortality.

Eat out to help out problem is t that it did or didn?t I?m trade infections in and of itself


Or the amount of money spent (I think that should have just been given to hospitality to stay shut)


It?s that it fed a general belief that This Was Over and we could go back to normal. Despite lockdown 2/tiers, people are behaving very differently to April

Let's just hope and pray this new variant has less severe symptoms. Most viruses mutate over time with one example being the Spanish 'Flu which eventually burnt itself after 4 waves in around 4 years.


There wasn't a vaccine then so hopefully we will be spared a protracted crisis.

This virus should have the same or lower mortality - not proved - but there is obviously a fear amongst other nations that what should happen may not happen.


Did the government include this scenario when it planned for the worst case a few weeks back I wonder.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Had a great experience with Paul. He sorted out a lighting issue we had very efficiently and I would highly recommend him! https://www.checkatrade.com/trades/edgleycontracting382245
    • Week 11 fixtures...   Saturday 8th November Tottenham Hotspur v Manchester United Everton v Fulham West Ham United v Burnley Sunderland v Arsenal Chelsea v Wolverhampton Wanderers   Sunday 9th November Aston Villa v AFC Bournemouth Brentford v Newcastle United Crystal Palace v Brighton & Hove Albion Nottingham Forest v Leeds United Manchester City v Liverpool
    • Another recommendation for Dulwich Test and Services Centre. Only been using them for a couple of years but wish I’d found them earlier 
    • A new roadmap (surely railmap?!) for rail accessibility has been published: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/accessible-railways-roadmap It says "approximately 56% of stations and around 66% of the 1.3 billion journeys that take place on the network have step-free access to platforms...  "£373 million has been committed over the next 5 years to deliver Access for All projects, providing step-free access from station entrances to and between platforms, alongside other essential accessibility upgrades. These works, together, will increase the number of step-free stations across Great Britain from 56% to 58%. "This improvement will make travel easier with step-free access available at stations covering an increased share of total rail journeys – from 66% up to 71%" Don't know what that means for us here: upgrading Peckham Rye would cover a lot of rail journeys but the cost has no doubt increased from the £40m figure previously quoted. So that would eat into a lot of the funding.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...