Jump to content

Advice on a wireless thermostat problem please?


Recommended Posts

I have a wireless programmable thermostat - a Salus RT500RF.


I had had it about four years with no problem at all, when out of the blue the boiler started going on and off randomly - so for example even if I turned the thermostat down to 16, I'd get up in the morning to a hothouse with the living room temperature in the 20s.


The flame symbol on the thermostat wasn't showing, but the light on the boiler was green.


I had to turn all the radiators off to try to save gas, plus it was driving me mad(der) when the boiler kept going on and off all night :(


This would happen for a while, then it seemed to correct itself for weeks, then it would start again. It's out of its guarantee period.


Long story short, I phoned the manufacturer who said that this was an old style of thermostat. Basically what was happening was that something else within the wireless range was controlling the boiler, such as another boiler thermostat (or I've found on the internet it could be a wireless baby monitor or doorbell, though I can't see how that could control a boiler). The problems did start around the time that I had new neighbours, though obviously that could be completely coincidental.


Basically I was told that the solution was to change the address code/frequency. I know how to do this and it seems quite easy to do. There are five possible frequencies.


I know this seems a very stupid question, but do I have to keep on changing the frequency until I find one where there's no interference? Given that the problem is so erratic, it might be weeks until there was interference (and I actually noticed it - which generally I only have done because the temperature has suddenly shot up when I've been there).


Will this actually resolve things, or do I have to bite the bullet and pay again to get a different kind of thermostat? This one hasn't got great reviews on forums, but on the other hand that may be because people don't realise that this problem can arise.

Hello Sue, below is a list of popular frequencies. avoid 2.4 & 5.00 GHz (wi-fi)



Garage door openers, alarm systems, etc. - Around 40 megahertz

Standard cordless phones: Bands from 40 to 50 megahertz

Baby monitors: 49 megahertz

Radio controlled airplanes: Around 72 megahertz, which is different from...

Radio controlled cars: Around 75 megahertz

Wildlife tracking collars: 215 to 220 megahertz

MIR space station: 145 megahertz and 437 megahertz

Cell phones: 824 to 849 megahertz



Hope this helps!!

Thanks right-clicking, the only problem is that all I have are five black jumpers on the thermostat labelled 1 to 5 and five white switches in the receiver, also labelled 1 to 5.


I have no idea what frequencies these numbers correspond to :))


All I have is some instructions off the internet which say "we have found the removal of blocks 2 and 4 to be very successful" :))


ETA: So I guess I'll try that then :))

Hi Sue, I don't believe that you're changing the frequency when you change those jumpers, I believe you are changing the RF code (or 'tag') of the transmitter.


It will always operate at 868MHz.


Unless the transmitted code matches the receiver code, your thermostat will ignore the message.


Hence change the code, and so long as your transmitter and receiver match, it will simply be a case of trial and error to find out which one is least likely to suffer from interference from others nearby.


FYI, the most likely interference is from another thermostat (they can transmit over 60m), and then possibly from a poorly calibrated cellphone. Either way, changing the identity code on both transmitter and receiver to a different match should fix it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • he's not on the general radar - not with the Labour tax scandal and the new Tories wanting to buddy up with Starmer (on their terms). if anything, he's a irrelevant distraction from some real alarms
    • Let me rephrase this He does not seem to be personally bothered by the impact he has.  Rather than immune from somebody taking action against him.  Although the bar had to be raised and raised before anyone did anything, and there are still those in his party who think it was wrong to get rid of him. He delivered a poor Brexit so didn't get that right.  He didn't believe in it, in the first place, he was just getting one up on his chum Dave.
    • 1. No he's not, he made a pigs ear of things, his leadership was poor and his behaviour was unbecoming of the highest office in the land.  2. No they don't,  he was a prime buffoon 3. Not a messiah, in no way. He caused great damage to both the Party and Country after three years of differing by May. The only thing he completed was B  r  e  x  i  t.  Are we paying the price. Don't ask me, I was in an induced coma at the time, fighting for my own life.    
    • My comment is trying to not take any political side but rather be objective on what I see, hear and read. If the Government made a positive difference to people's lives, people would be pro this Govt, but sadly the majority don't see an improvement since they have been in Office, but rather the opposite so people's opinions of the Government are poor.  I think if you did a straw poll of users on here, the result for those in favour of the Government is likely to be unfavourable, but I may be totally wrong, quite possible. No one I speak or am in contact with has a single good word to say about the current Administration. In fact the calls for a General Election just become stronger and stronger. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...