Jump to content

Advice on a wireless thermostat problem please?


Recommended Posts

I have a wireless programmable thermostat - a Salus RT500RF.


I had had it about four years with no problem at all, when out of the blue the boiler started going on and off randomly - so for example even if I turned the thermostat down to 16, I'd get up in the morning to a hothouse with the living room temperature in the 20s.


The flame symbol on the thermostat wasn't showing, but the light on the boiler was green.


I had to turn all the radiators off to try to save gas, plus it was driving me mad(der) when the boiler kept going on and off all night :(


This would happen for a while, then it seemed to correct itself for weeks, then it would start again. It's out of its guarantee period.


Long story short, I phoned the manufacturer who said that this was an old style of thermostat. Basically what was happening was that something else within the wireless range was controlling the boiler, such as another boiler thermostat (or I've found on the internet it could be a wireless baby monitor or doorbell, though I can't see how that could control a boiler). The problems did start around the time that I had new neighbours, though obviously that could be completely coincidental.


Basically I was told that the solution was to change the address code/frequency. I know how to do this and it seems quite easy to do. There are five possible frequencies.


I know this seems a very stupid question, but do I have to keep on changing the frequency until I find one where there's no interference? Given that the problem is so erratic, it might be weeks until there was interference (and I actually noticed it - which generally I only have done because the temperature has suddenly shot up when I've been there).


Will this actually resolve things, or do I have to bite the bullet and pay again to get a different kind of thermostat? This one hasn't got great reviews on forums, but on the other hand that may be because people don't realise that this problem can arise.

Hello Sue, below is a list of popular frequencies. avoid 2.4 & 5.00 GHz (wi-fi)



Garage door openers, alarm systems, etc. - Around 40 megahertz

Standard cordless phones: Bands from 40 to 50 megahertz

Baby monitors: 49 megahertz

Radio controlled airplanes: Around 72 megahertz, which is different from...

Radio controlled cars: Around 75 megahertz

Wildlife tracking collars: 215 to 220 megahertz

MIR space station: 145 megahertz and 437 megahertz

Cell phones: 824 to 849 megahertz



Hope this helps!!

Thanks right-clicking, the only problem is that all I have are five black jumpers on the thermostat labelled 1 to 5 and five white switches in the receiver, also labelled 1 to 5.


I have no idea what frequencies these numbers correspond to :))


All I have is some instructions off the internet which say "we have found the removal of blocks 2 and 4 to be very successful" :))


ETA: So I guess I'll try that then :))

Hi Sue, I don't believe that you're changing the frequency when you change those jumpers, I believe you are changing the RF code (or 'tag') of the transmitter.


It will always operate at 868MHz.


Unless the transmitted code matches the receiver code, your thermostat will ignore the message.


Hence change the code, and so long as your transmitter and receiver match, it will simply be a case of trial and error to find out which one is least likely to suffer from interference from others nearby.


FYI, the most likely interference is from another thermostat (they can transmit over 60m), and then possibly from a poorly calibrated cellphone. Either way, changing the identity code on both transmitter and receiver to a different match should fix it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...