Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I just passed a film crew at Dulwich Picture Gallery. Unfortunately, Penguin68, at least one was not adhering to the basics, which supports my thoughts. It is human nature to want to break free, to not mask all the time, and to think that the rules don't apply to you if you are one of the few groups of people that are being allowed to work in groups and teams, much like they did before the restrictions were in place.

at least one was not adhering to the basics


In what way? Not wearing a mask? (may have been clinically exempted). Too close? May have been in a bubble. Many, perhaps most professional film crews are tested before coming together to work - and during a job if it lasts over a day; so the risk may have been quite low. This is a very different set of circumstances to a bunch of people meeting randomly together. Most crews are freelance, so if they get infected they are losing work and pay - so they have a huge incentive not to - as they will be tested for it.

Nigello Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I agree with RoundTable and am glad they are

> earning and paying taxes but would add that the

> very fact that they are being allowed to work in

> this way, when many are not, may suggest they are

> somehow special and that could, unconsciously,

> lead to their not wearing masks, getting too

> close, being excited to be seeing colleagues, etc.

> I fear that complacency can easily set in in such

> circumstances though choose to give them the

> benefit of the doubt because I have no evidence

> that this is the case. (This applies to all of us

> - laxness is easy to slip into: just look at how

> many people are out and about this time compared

> to the first lockdown, when we had a less

> transmissable strain and good weather. We stayed

> in in our droves, unlike now...)



By your logic supermarkets should be closed too. The whole point is that the crew can form a work bubble because they have the same fixed number of people day in day out. Supermarkets cannot do this (yet they are but then we do need to eat), neither can hotels, pubs, restaurants, concert venues, sport stadiums...see?

Nigello Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I just passed a film crew at Dulwich Picture

> Gallery. Unfortunately, Penguin68, at least one

> was not adhering to the basics, which supports my

> thoughts. It is human nature to want to break

> free, to not mask all the time, and to think that

> the rules don't apply to you if you are one of the

> few groups of people that are being allowed to

> work in groups and teams, much like they did

> before the restrictions were in place.


'I just accidentally passed through the filming site which may or may not have been a necessary journey but since my curtain doesn't twitch that far and it is a hot topic on the forum I just couldn't help myself from going over to see if I can catch somebody out so I can rush back and report on it'. There, I fixed that for you.

Nigello Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I doubt that any operating protocol would negate

> the basics, especially when the offender was off

> site and amongst non-staff members.



And did the offender have a big sign around his/her/their neck saying 'I am part of the film crew' for you to know that he/she/they are off site and therefore mingling with non-staff members? And did the people he was amongst have a sign around their neck saying 'we are non-staff members'?

I know a couple of people who are film/magazine support (make up artist/stylists etc). From everything they say and what I've seen on their social media, the organisations they work with take current shoots extremely seriously. One of them was scheduled to do an all day magazine shoot last week, all of the (reduced) team were tested at the client's expense 24 hours before, then tested again on the day of the shoot, and when one person tested positive on the day (having tested negative a day earlier), the shoot was immediately shut down and postponed for five days in case any one who attended the morning test on the day of the shoot then tested positive.


I'm sure that there are variations in compliance in this industry - like there are across all industries and sectors - but we are all still watching TV, demanding new content not repeats, and companies are still trying to sell products, and bring new products to market, which requires advertising, so I don't see that shutting this activity down entirely is realistic.

Siduhe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> I'm sure that there are variations in compliance

> in this industry - like there are across all

> industries and sectors - but we are all still

> watching TV, demanding new content not repeats,

> and companies are still trying to sell products,

> and bring new products to market, which requires

> advertising, so I don't see that shutting this

> activity down entirely is realistic.


Oh yes - we all want to watch new shows on Netflix.


The last in the series of Blacklist had cartoon inserts - didn't really work for me.

Siduhe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I know a couple of people who are film/magazine

> support (make up artist/stylists etc). From

> everything they say and what I've seen on their

> social media, the organisations they work with

> take current shoots extremely seriously. One of

> them was scheduled to do an all day magazine shoot

> last week, all of the (reduced) team were tested

> at the client's expense 24 hours before, then

> tested again on the day of the shoot, and when one

> person tested positive on the day (having tested

> negative a day earlier), the shoot was immediately

> shut down and postponed for five days in case any

> one who attended the morning test on the day of

> the shoot then tested positive.

>

> I'm sure that there are variations in compliance

> in this industry - like there are across all

> industries and sectors - but we are all still

> watching TV, demanding new content not repeats,

> and companies are still trying to sell products,

> and bring new products to market, which requires

> advertising, so I don't see that shutting this

> activity down entirely is realistic.



Well said. It's not just about keeping us entertained though. There are thousands of people scrambling trying to make a living in dire circumstances with no safety net, doing the best they can with the very limited options they have. Ultimately, people need to eat and not everybody has a guaranteed monthly income.

  • 4 weeks later...

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Do adverts for banks actually increase the number

> of customers they attract? Who opens an account

> off the back of a TV advert featuring a horse

> riding across a beach?



One of the few times I got questioned about money by a market research company - they said name a pension company. "Scottish Widows" I said - she replied "Everyone says that"

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Can’t say I approve but equally staff can vote with their feet. Cabs to collect and deliver - not bad.Maybe Gail’s know something none of us do… Having said that, sure those that are walking in and around Dulwich might prefer cake, hot drinks etc in a venue that is not a pub with the noise from over loud punters… so guess one waits and sees…  Do take some pics or let us know if people are popping in… my guess is yes… 
    • OP has perhaps inadvertently provided free advertising for Gails, drawing attention to Dulwich Gails being open on Christmas Day.
    • Staff get taxis in and out and get paid extra (which I think is x2). Some people like to work on Bank Holidays and others don’t. Some people actively avoid Christmas for personal reasons. Long live freedom of choice! 
    • Here is another article from the excellent Special Needs Jungle (SNJ) with tips for responses to the SEND conversation survey. Including shoe horning in EHCPs which they "forget" to ask a question about in the conversation. And living as we do in Southwark with the huge misfortune of 100% academy secondary schools, some thoughts on this and how unlikely inclusion in mainstream is within the current education landscape. Closing date 14 Jan 2026. And please consider a donation to the excellent entirely run by volunteers SNJ. In my view the government could save money by creating some smaller mainstream secondary schools for kids who can cope in primary school but not  with the scale of secondary, and need a calmer less busy setting. The funding would have to be different - it is currently on a per pupil basis which favours larger schools. But it would undoubtedly be cheaper than specialist provision, and the huge cost to individual children and families (emotional and financial) and to society. https://www.specialneedsjungle.com/tips-help-complete-governments-send-conversation-survey-law/ If anyone wants to take a radical step to help their struggling child, my tip is to move far away: these are the best two schools I have ever visited and in a beautiful part of the country. I only wish we'd moved there before it was too late for my son who had to suffer multiple failings at Charter North and then at the hands of Southwark SEND, out of education from February to October in year 10-11, having already suffered the enduring trauma of a very difficult early life, which in combination with ADHD made his time at schools which just don't care so very unbearable for all of us. https://www.cartmelprioryschool.co.uk/ https://settlebeck.org/ As an add on, I would say to anybody considering adoption, please take into account the education battles that you are very much more likely to face than the average parent. First you have schools to deal with, already terrible; then being passed from pillar to post within Southwark Education, SEND, Education Inclusion Team, round and round as they all do their best to explain why they are not responsible and you need someone different, let's hold another multi-agency meeting, never for one minute considering that if they put the child at the centre and used common sense they would achieve a lot more in much less time without loads of Southwark employees sitting in endless meetings with long suffering parents. It is hard to fully imagine this at the start of your adoption journey, full of hope as you are, but truly education is not for the faint hearted, and should be factored into your decision. You'll never hear from people who are really struggling and continue to do so, only from those who've had challenges but overcome them and it's all lovely. And education, the very people who should be there to help, are the ones who make your lives the most hellish out of everything your child and you face.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...