Jump to content

Recommended Posts

?Equivalence? gets raised all the time by brexiteers


This is very good on why that wont happen


Tldr: it suits uk and no one else. So they are reduced to whining impotently for it. Quelle surprise.


https://europeantomorrow.blogspot.com/2021/08/why-doesnt-eu-just-agree-equivalence.html?spref=tw

I know - it's hilarious Cat - "we lost, get over it!"


thanks for pointing that out again!


But at least my impotent whining is based on actually giving a flying f*** about reality, and not wanting this horror show to get worse


Wheras listening to Leaver impotent whining is doubly egregious because you got what you wanted, we are suffering as expected and still you lot bitch and moan

j.a. Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> TheCat Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > One doesn't have to look very far for regular

> > impotent whining.....

>

>

> Or for arrogant, smarmy punditry from massive

> hypocrites.


Dont be so harsh on yourself j.a.


But seriously...funny how all I did was copy verbatim the same term that sephiroth used to describe leavers. But it's only arrogant and smarmy when I say it....??? Sure..im the hypocrite.....

Yea it is arrogant and smarmy when people who won, threw away control but claimed victory and laugh in losers face claim they can use the same phrase


Because you can?t.


You won. So please - keep displaying the spoils of victory and don?t steal the language of those who lost

I'll be honest. Im not really that interested in engaging every little point on this thread anymore. I think I've attempted to do that in the past ad infinitum, so a bit over it.


I don't mean this in the harsh way its going to sound..but 90 percent of this thread now is just you occasionally posting links to articles or making points which provide you with your own self-satidfaction. Then followed by supportive comments from other remain acolytes bemoaning how disastrous everything is, and how you were all saying it would be exactly like this for years.


You're of course welcome to do that, but I've made my arguments many times before, and can't be bothered being too involved in this seemingly constant tit for tat point-scoring which this thread has become.


So I'll just dip in with a smarmy arrogant comment from time to time.... just so know I care:)

Yes you have made your arguments many times - but have they ever related to anything in the real world


?I?ll be honest. I?m not that interested??


Wasn?t it in the houses Of parliament debating ?boris?s Brexit? and the implications for NI that Ian Duncan smith said ?look this has all been discussed to death. Move on? despite British democracy trying to preempt problems?


And wasn?t it YOU weeks later saying ?this agreement is unacceptable and we must fight for British rights!? Because The eu were implementing the agreed deal


So I?m sorry you are bored. If I was you I would absent myself as well, from shame if nothing else


Bad things are happening to this country and will happen further. Because of you and your arrogance


Sorry you are bored. Unlike you professing you care about the country, I actually do. And that means dealing with the fallout from your (and others) arrogance


(And as I?ve said before. You KNOW all this. In the dark of night you feel it and worry. But instead of being a grown up and talking about reality you can per-formatively laugh at and dismiss others. Because the alternative is too grim for you to contemplate)

Sephiroth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> and don't we have more barriers on inward goods

> still to come later this year and start of next?


Yep, it's barely started. We're going to see some serious inflation, followed by increases in interest rates. That's when the mortgaged of Surrey will finally sit up and take notice. The problem is, how much of it will be put down to COVID, or 'EU intransigence'? My guess is, quite a lot. This government and it's client journalists are pretty good at deflection and brexit voters will go to almost any length to void admitting to themselves that they may have made a mistake.

not a problem rah


Tom Fenn has it covered: "All unsurprising. There were always going to be some teething problems while the UK left the EU. We who voted to leave anticipated this. What we didn't expect was a worldwide pandemic. EU and remoaners are using that as an excuse to take us back in. But who wants to drink lager??"


anticipated? check

global pandemic whilst not mentioning other EU countries not suffering same problems? check

Snobby remark about lager drinkers (which one would have though was opposite of metropolitan elite?) check


thing is NI trade is suffering far less - but Johnson and co have to explain to them that, ACTUALLY, NIP is bad for them because it will disrupt trade. That's the level of delusion we have to deal with

like - "EU and remoaners are using that as an excuse to take us back in"


how, and why is EU trying to take us back in? If we ever do decide we want to go back in we would have to convince them - and that won't be an easy job now. They aren't going to " try and get us back in"

? I don't think we'll be back into the decision making side for a long time. ?


Yep. We are now, voluntarily, rule takers, not involved in any discussions that might benefit us


Realignment with SM and CU more likely. But again, rule takers. Not makers


But the eu dragging us back in? As if. we should be so lucky


And wether is racist knuckleheads like uncle fester on here or more enlightened individuals like Cat, all we have are shrugs and taunts.

Well well, who?d have thought. All?s not well in the Garden of Eden


Surge in eurozone inflation tests nerve of central bankers


? Prices are rising rapidly as the bloc emerges from lockdown. Higher energy prices and supply bottlenecks are fuelling inflationary pressure and the index is being flattered by weak comparable figures last year. Prices are likely to climb even more rapidly over the coming months, with economists pencilling in a peak of 3.5 per cent?


https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/surge-in-eurozone-inflation-tests-nerve-of-central-bankers-g88sjl0ph


Must be Brexit?s fault

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, AFAICS, the "civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300" were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...