Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Come on Sephiroth cheer up. Things could be worse. Imagine how Le petit sun king Macron feels with a 60% disapproval rating, Marseille and banlieues in French cities imploding, jobs lost due to cancelled submarine offers and the first round of the Presidential election just round the corner.

Sephiroth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This country is weird



At least the Pint glass is back with a little crown picture on the it too


Surely that?s all been worth it. I?m not sure exactly how much it cost to get us here, but we did it.

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Come on Sephiroth cheer up. Things could be worse.

> Imagine how Le petit sun king Macron feels with a

> 60% disapproval rating, Marseille and banlieues in

> French cities imploding, jobs lost due to

> cancelled submarine offers and the first round of

> the Presidential election just round the corner.



None of which has anything to do with our own incompetent govt but it gives Keano a warm feeling which shows what a total #%^* he is.

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> There are benefits - I expect predominantly from

> subsidising markets, state aid and the like.

> Aimed at overseas investment rather than the late

> 70s of propping up failing British industry.

> Throwing money at things was hardly a Tory thing

> to do but times have changed.

1) the amount of subsidies you can pay is limited by your trade deals and desire to trade under WTO terms


2) throwing money at chums is a highly Tory thing to do. And these are the people we would trust to hand out subsidies to attract foreign investment in the UK?

?100m spent in attracting Nissan to develop and produce next generation electric vehicle batteries, and other coporations being wooed


Not sure how this fits in with the WTO etc but would not be permitted under EU state aid rules.


https://www.ft.com/content/0e07f6b5-1c54-4253-9860-b0ed0c6e75ab

I see that today the govt are pivoting from ?eu has a shortage of truck drivers too!!?


To


?But yeah we need some of their drivers so will allow them to come here. For a bit. Just for a bit mind. Don?t get comfortable?


Remains to be seen if they will accept such a graceful invitation

The UK haulage industry was going downhill before EU drivers rocked up, like fruit picking it's an industry that simply doesn't appeal to Brits and what they're prepared to do workwise, e.g. long hours, often sleeping in laybys, no washing/toilet facilities etc. The Gov's claim that EU lorry drivers undercut Brits is disingenuous to say the least...

FoM meant they could do either, they could work for haulage companies from their own country, but they were also able to work for UK haulage companies, likewise UK drivers were free to work for other haulage companies in the EU.

For a long time there's been a growling shortage of UK haulage drivers working for UK companies, and that gap was eventually filled by EU drivers, basic market forces at work. The market has since changed due to Brexit which is why we now have a shortage of drivers again...

So we need 6 figure numbers of drivers to come here and help out


So we will be grateful right?


?Home Secretary @pritipatel announces 3 month Visas for 5000 drivers & then sets up task force to deport EU lorry drivers who remain U.K. after 24th Dec-She said ?It is a special privilege for lorry drivers to be able come here & work & it shouldn?t be abused?🇬🇧🙈

Sephiroth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So we need 6 figure numbers of drivers to come

> here and help out

>

> So we will be grateful right?

>

> ?Home Secretary @pritipatel announces 3 month

> Visas for 5000 drivers & then sets up task force

> to deport EU lorry drivers who remain U.K. after

> 24th Dec-She said ?It is a special privilege for

> lorry drivers to be able come here & work & it

> shouldn?t be abused?🇬🇧🙈


Did she actually say that Seph? It's unbelievable if true.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You wouldn't imagine that a haulage firm in the UK

> would go out of business, but this one has:

>

> https://twitter.com/hallrjh55/status/1442106712434

> 020353


I'm as remoaner as they come but none of us know the company's commercial contracts or borrowing arrangements. Its sister haulage companies all seem fine. It might be that it's "flexible" and casualised workforce have all buggered off to somewhere that will offer them better conditions. Who knows?

Nope, totally believable, whether true or not.

Along with ?you can now benefit from restricted travel and work across Europe, you lucky, lucky, bastards?.


Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sephiroth Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > So we need 6 figure numbers of drivers to come

> > here and help out

> >

> > So we will be grateful right?

> >

> > ?Home Secretary @pritipatel announces 3 month

> > Visas for 5000 drivers & then sets up task

> force

> > to deport EU lorry drivers who remain U.K.

> after

> > 24th Dec-She said ?It is a special privilege

> for

> > lorry drivers to be able come here & work & it

> > shouldn?t be abused?🇬🇧🙈

>

> Did she actually say that Seph? It's unbelievable

> if true.

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The UK haulage industry was going downhill before

> EU drivers rocked up, like fruit picking it's an

> industry that simply doesn't appeal to Brits and

> what they're prepared to do workwise, e.g. long

> hours, often sleeping in laybys, no washing/toilet

> facilities etc. The Gov's claim that EU lorry

> drivers undercut Brits is disingenuous to say the

> least...



Haven't you just contradicted yourself? You say brits aren't prepared to accept the conditions of the job, but EU drivers do...isn't that the very definition of 'undercutting'?

TheCat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Haven't you just contradicted yourself? You say

> brits aren't prepared to accept the conditions of

> the job, but EU drivers do...isn't that the very

> definition of 'undercutting'?


Not in this context, the Gov's use of 'undercutting' was clearly to imply that EU workers were lowering wages for British workers, it's an oft used argument by Leavers both during and after the Brexit debate, that's simply not the case with the haulage industry whereby British workers had long since given up on the industry.

EU drivers didn't have to do any 'undercutting', they simply filled a growing void that already existed, a void that has since returned after many EU workers returned to the EU post-Brexit...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • was the price not displayed on the menu?
    • It has come to this author’s attention that the world of 4+ admissions — that most enigmatic of educational rites — continues to bewilder even the most composed of parents. Fear not. For in a former life, I was not merely a humble observer, but a seasoned educator of over twenty years, and Head of Pre-Prep for a distinguished dozen. Now, with quill exchanged for touchscreen, I have taken to that most modern of salons — Instagram — to dispense guidance, answer frequently whispered questions, and illuminate the shadowy corners of school selection with clarity and calm. Each post bears my signature twist: a blend of insight, levity, and the occasional raised eyebrow. Should you find yourself adrift in the sea of admissions, I suggest you peruse my latest dispatch. It may well be the lifeline you seek. The Delicate Dilemma of the Summer-born 4+ Scholars Yours in solidarity and scholastic savvy, Lord Pencilton  🎩✏️
    • Perhaps Gooseygreeny was not familiar with the wildlife before Gala was imposed on the park, since when its value to wildlife has deteriorated. The Park had never been disturbed before, as the council had respected it as a Site of Importance for Nature Conservation, so only the Common was licensed by them as a site for events. The first time Gala held their event, there was a tree with woodpeckers nesting in it right in the middle of the main field they used and thrushes, blackbirds and great tits nesting within the shrubs and trees immediately surrounding the field. The woodpeckers were thriving on ants from the anthills in the grass. To those of us who used to enjoy watching the wildlife, it was very obviously a Site of Importance for a variety of birds. Despite being accessed by the public and their dogs, it had been relatively undisturbed,  which was one of the main reasons why it was so special and why I have been opposed to the Gala festival being held during the bird nesting season.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...