Jump to content

Traffic fines around Dulwich village - has anyone appealed successfully


Recommended Posts

We have just received 2 separate notices from the council because apparently we drove along Burbage/ Turney roads & the 2nd Dulwich village northbound towards Pickwick road. Has anyone else had similar notices and appealed successfully?

Seems likethe reatrictions are only at cerain hours of the day to coincide with school drop-off & pickups maybe?

Naiada,

I had a look at the signs at the DV roudnabout a couple of weeks ago. They are pretty clear during daylight but I am not sure how visible they would be at night and\or in poor weather. Certainly in December lots of people were ignoring or missing the signs. If, for example you are coming NOrth up Gallery Road and turning left into Burbage you are probably paying attention to the roundabout and may miss the signs that are quite high. Are there any signs on Gallery Road warning of left turn restrictions?


Alos, you may want to check whether thes signs are as originally planned by the council, ceratinly at Townley that is not the case


You may want to look at the Government traffic signs manual eg, recommended height section 5.4

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/771873/traffic-signs-manual-chapter-1.pdf


Edited to add: Had a look this afternon. Coming North up Gallery road there is a pretty clear timed no left turn sign in red circle, though it is last in a row of 3 signs so may be obscured. In poor visibility I think it would be easy to see that and end up going straight ahead without seeing the blue signs for DV which are quite high up.


Coming North up College Road there is no red warning sign (at least between picture Gallery and roundabout) so if turning into Burbage road there is very little time to see the blue, high placed signs and react. Especially as drivers are probably looking right at that stage to get on to roundabout.


In 10 mins this afternoon (around 3.15 so still light) I saw 19 cars and vans go through the signs.

  • 5 weeks later...

For the first offense Council should have sent the warning letter to each Driver who committed the offense because the prohibition signs are erected just recently.

After you are aware of and if you do it again the fine is absolutely right decision.

I am so glad I got rid of my Car in Feb.2019


So many restrictions on Car Owners. ( you don;t even need to actually Drive your car. }

Park it and you will still get done.


What worries me is Walking around the area.


If you try to sit, I'll tax your seat

If you get too cold, I'll tax the heat

If you take a walk, I'll tax your feet


Taxman! 'Cause I'm the taxman


Believe me.. it will come. with #Sadiqkhan 10% Council Tax rise.


Foxy.

  • 1 month later...
Update - we appealed online in early February and have just had a letter saying the fine for ?65 has gone up to ?190 for one offense - despite their website saying no additional penalty will be added whilst the appeal was being reviewed!! There is no-one answering the phones at Southwark council to discuss it with - it's all automated.
I got a PCN for driving through Dulwich Village at a prohibited time (the signs were not clear to me or I wouldn't have done it, and doubt others would either as who wants a fine?). I appealed it successfully as it was a first offence but told I would be fined if it reoccured.

Naiada Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Update - we appealed online in early February and

> have just had a letter saying the fine for ?65 has

> gone up to ?190 for one offense - despite their

> website saying no additional penalty will be added

> whilst the appeal was being reviewed!! There is

> no-one answering the phones at Southwark council

> to discuss it with - it's all automated.



Approach your councillor for help, or failing that try Helen Hayes.

Regardless of whether the appeal should be upheld, increasing the fine whilst the appeal is ongoing doesn't seem acceptable. Would echo getting in touch with your local councilor. Likely to be an admin error but can imagine the process is frustrating.
I've no idea about these particular fines, but from my experience having had various (and too many) FPNs over the years the reduced rate is for quick payment, ie a discount. As such by appealing you forego your opportunity to have a discount. It may be morally wrong but I expect legally OK. Just stating this as my experience rather than an opinion.
I think it varies. Where I have had cause to challenge a PCN in the past the 14 day period for early payment was paused. If your informal challenge is rejected by the council and you decide to take it to the independent appeals body then you have to pay the full amount if they don't find in your favour.

Lack of clarity/transparency in the process is part of the problem.


I received a penalty in Lewisham where there was a similar scheme to Dulwich Village. I appealed immediately but didn't hear anything back so after two weeks I paid the fine to avoid it doubling on the basis that it would be refunded if my appeal was upheld. Instead I received a letter saying that as I had paid the fine the case was closed.


The scheme in Lewisham, by the way, has now been partly scrapped.



rjsmall Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think it varies. Where I have had cause to

> challenge a PCN in the past the 14 day period for

> early payment was paused. If your informal

> challenge is rejected by the council and you

> decide to take it to the independent appeals body

> then you have to pay the full amount if they don't

> find in your favour.

sandyman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lack of clarity/transparency in the process is

> part of the problem.

>

> I received a penalty in Lewisham where there was a

> similar scheme to Dulwich Village. I appealed

> immediately but didn't hear anything back so after

> two weeks I paid the fine to avoid it doubling on

> the basis that it would be refunded if my appeal

> was upheld. Instead I received a letter saying

> that as I had paid the fine the case was closed.

>

> The scheme in Lewisham, by the way, has now been

> partly scrapped.

>

>

> rjsmall Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I think it varies. Where I have had cause to

> > challenge a PCN in the past the 14 day period

> for

> > early payment was paused. If your informal

> > challenge is rejected by the council and you

> > decide to take it to the independent appeals

> body

> > then you have to pay the full amount if they

> don't

> > find in your favour.


Lewisham are now trying to reinstate the original road closures but under the guise of safer school streets. However no actual school streets closed - just a way of getting quiet streets back for the nimbys that live their with their rows of cars...

  • 4 weeks later...

Fines from cameras in a Low Traffic Neighbourhood (LTN) run by Southwark Council in London have generated ?2.5 million in revenue just three months after the scheme?s launch, data from a Freedom of Information (FOI) request reveals.


A large amount of fixed penalty charges have been issued to road users by three?LTN cameras installed in Dulwich and one in Walworth.


In Dulwich Village, drivers have received?22,424 fines?between January 11 and February 28 2021

Although this will not change anything about penalties already issued you can register for the consultation on the review until 10 May 2021 and you will be advised when the consultation is issued. Register at

https://consultations.southwark.gov.uk/environment-leisure/dulwich-review-registration-form/


You will still be able to respond to the consultation if you don?t register but this will make sure you are aware its been issued.

A general bit of information - is that the council have to send you the PCN notification letter within 28 days of the alleged offence. Check the date the letter was printed and sent out at the top of the letter. The date at the bottom of the letter is the date of the alleged contravention and must not be more than 28 days before the date the letter was printed and sent out. If it is more than 28 days the PCN is invalidated.

If this has happened to you and you paid the fine, you should demand a refund from Southwark Council as they have technically broken the law and should not have sent the PCN.

The Civil Enforcement of Parking Contraventions England Representations and Appeals Regulations 2007 (updated)(Part 6 of the Traffic Management Act 2004). Page 26, paragraph 14 Penalty charge notices - service by post (5)a.

Thanks for this info. I have had one where the contravention is 19/01/21 the PCN is 19/04/21. They really are extracting the urine and I will now contest ti. Cheers.





EDRH1114090399 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> A general bit of information - is that the council

> have to send you the PCN notification letter

> within 28 days of the alleged offence. Check the

> date the letter was printed and sent out at the

> top of the letter. The date at the bottom of the

> letter is the date of the alleged contravention

> and must not be more than 28 days before the date

> the letter was printed and sent out. If it is more

> than 28 days the PCN is invalidated.

> If this has happened to you and you paid the fine,

> you should demand a refund from Southwark Council

> as they have technically broken the law and should

> not have sent the PCN.

> The Civil Enforcement of Parking Contraventions

> England Representations and Appeals Regulations

> 2007 (updated)(Part 6 of the Traffic Management

> Act 2004). Page 26, paragraph 14 Penalty charge

> notices - service by post (5)a.

I think you'll find that the regulations specific to _service_ of PCNs are the Civil Enforcement of Parking Contraventions (England) General Regulations 2007, SI 2007/3483 https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2007/3483/contents/made. Regulation 10 does have some specific exceptions to the 28 day period, up to a maximum of six months, for service by post. (I'm assuming btw, following EDRH1114090399's reference, that these _are_ the sets of regulations relevant to what you're talking about.)


PS: There's similar provision of a six month limit, again in the case where there has been delay in the Secretary of State's supply of relevant particulars of the registered keeper in response to a timely request, in the Bus Lane Contraventions (Penalty Charges, Adjudication and Enforcement) (England) Regulations 2005 https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2005/2757/regulation/8/made .


ETA: And in the London Local Authorities and Transport for London Act 2003 s.6 https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukla/2003/3/part/2/enacted.


ETA 24/5 I'm confident that it's the last mentioned of these that's the relevant set of regulations, dealing with moving traffic infractions rather than those of parking or misuse of bus lanes.

i appealled to the fine entering dulwich village and was successful , i have attached my letter please edit as required

you can simply submit this online on the southwark parking website, that what i did, add your own pics


good luck with this,,, it is an absolute disgrace of a cashcow charge

Well done. It's a disgrace that they can fleece us like this.




boomshake22 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> i appealled to the fine entering dulwich village

> and was successful , i have attached my letter

> please edit as required

> you can simply submit this online on the southwark

> parking website, that what i did, add your own

> pics

>

> good luck with this,,, it is an absolute disgrace

> of a cashcow charge

boomshake22 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> i appealled to the fine entering dulwich village

> and was successful , i have attached my letter

> please edit as required

> you can simply submit this online on the southwark

> parking website, that what i did, add your own

> pics

>

> good luck with this,,, it is an absolute disgrace

> of a cashcow charge



Well done! I wish I had seen this before I paid the fine a couple of weeks ago. You made some very good points in your appeal.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Sorry, not having a dig at Southwark for that.   I'm just shocked that next door they've chosen to abandon such an institutional community / family event so they can keep pumping out commercial stuff instead.   I suppose the same could happen here next although we don't really have any longstanding family events like that one.
    • No doubt the schools in Harrogate are being discussed on the East Harrogate Forum or whatever. Dulwich College is being discussed because it's local. Saying "ooh, there were loads of schools mentioned" is a bit dismissive. It was Dulwich College that referred sex abuse allegations about pupils to the police and Dulwich College that used the spectre of the police to suppress dissent. 🤔
    • Hi, I was just wondering what experiences any of you have had in relation to an Independent Panel review relating to the Permanent Exclusion of a SEN child. 1. General experience Any experiences, positive or negative, in general? 2. Clerks Associates UK Any experience of this entity acting as an "independent clerk" to an Independent Review Panel in a matter involving a Permanent Exclusion of a SEN pupil, also involving discrimination under the Equality Act 2010. There is limited publicly available information with regards to this "independent clerk"; however, I can see from their Annual Report & Accounts at Companies House that they are a small, privately owned organisation.   I am very concerned that there is a clear and material risk that they are highly dependent for their revenues and cash flow from the business that they receive from the school and its parent Trust (which has 9 schools in total under its management) who have appointed them. I also note that the Trust has a material employee relations dispute with their staff over underpayment of maternity pay whilst materially increasing the salaries of the highest paid Trust executives and other highly paid staff (presumably the Head Teachers). https://southwarknews.co.uk/news/community/teachers-at-six-charter-schools-walk-out-in-first-of-four-strike-days-planned-for-this-month/ Given the current situation, we have no choice but to engage in this process of an Independent Panel Review; however, we are concerned as to various elements including this one which is a key role in providing independence. 3. Independent SEN expert We have the right to an independent SEN expert to review the matter and provide their opinion to the Independent Review Panel. The concept is that this person is supposedly acting "independently" and also solely in respect of the SEN elements of the matter. We do not however know who this person is, their experience or level of independence. The last information that I can find in the public domain about the effectiveness of an Independent SEN expert is a UK govt report from 2014 which portrays a very mixed experience for parents. Hence, we are seeking to understand if anyone has any more recent experience of an Independent SEN expert in relation to an Independent Panel Review. Many thanks for any thoughts that you have based on your experience. For reasons of confidentiality, it is perhaps better to send any replies to me directly. Many thanks
    • Hang in there, friends. Most of us appreciate that you're trying you best and these companies are a nightmare!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...