Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Given the disruption to education over the past 12 months (and continuing) is there a valid case for the government to 'write off' this academic year across all year levels?...and start afresh in September in the same school year as was started last Septmeber.


This would have the effect of basically making a permanent shift in the the ages of schooling from 4-17 to 5-18...which in itself I don't see as a massive problem, as arguably kids start school too young in the UK anyway.


A key issue obviously comes at each end of that age range...parents expecting their 4 year olds to start school this September would suddenly be asked to wait another year (so the govt may have to provide further childcare funding support), and those who thought they were off into the world or off to uni at the end of this academic year will have another year to wait. Obviously this will see knock on effects at Universities...but if properly funded by the government (i.e. effectively underwrite university fees this year), then it could mean something similar is done at tertiary level, which wouldn't be the worst thing in the world, given the cohort of students who were set to graduate this year would be let loose on a jobs market which will have no jobs for them in 2021 (giving the economy a year to recover could make a lot of sense for hiring plans to normalise). And of course what of children who go to pvt schools...should parents be asked to pay an additional year of tuition from what they originally expected?


Anyway, plenty of practical problems with such a suggestion...but would they be insurmountable when offset against the potential problems arising for children's education that such a drastic move might solve?

I do remember as a 16 year feeling that missing a year or resitting it seemed it would be the biggest disaster in the world.


At 25 it seemed like not much really - just a year - the most important thing is your goal being something you really want and that it'll make you happy and also it's obtainable/realistic. Many people do the same job for years on end.


If we do make them redo it lets give them counsel as to what they want and how they should go about getting it so they won't regret what they choose to do.

There?s no easy solution, especially given the wide variability in lockdown provision between schools. I?m aware even within ED there is a huge difference in what schools are providing. I know my son would be distraught at being asked to do the same stuff for another year.


It would present huge infrastructure problems - you?d effectively have to create a whole new year of nursery supply for delayed reception children. At the other end, how do Universities pay their bills if they have no intake for a year?


The thought has occurred to me but the financial and practical implications are massive. Given everything central and local government has to do to rollout the vaccine and respond to all the issues, I?d be amazed if there is capacity to deal with everything that this would need.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
    • Niko 07818 607 583 has been doing jobs for us for several years, he is reliable, always there for us, highly recommended! 
    • I am keeping my fingers crossed the next few days are not so loud. I honestly think it is the private, back garden displays that are most problematic as, in general, there is no way of knowing when and where they might happen. For those letting off a few bangers in the garden I get it is tempting to think what's the harm in a few minutes of 'fun', but it is the absolute randomness of sudden bangs that can do irreparable damage to people and animals. With organised events that are well advertised there is some forewarning at least, and the hope is that organisers of such events can be persuaded to adopt and make a virtue of using only low noise displays in future.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...