Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Oh the fun never stops in our house ...


After a 7 wk spell in hospital my mother-in-law was discharged just before Christmas and is going from strength to strength - hooray. One of her medical probs was blood clots on her lung and she was being treated with warfarin in hosp and now has a district nurse visiting her everyday to continue warfarin injections at home.


She told us today that the district nurse has not been for the last 2 days as my MIL does not have any needles left for the injections. Apparently, my MIL has to supply the needles herself via repeat prescriptions from her GP. Her GP says she does not need the warfarin and is refusing to re-supply needles but the hosp specialist has said she is to continue treatment.


What can we do?


She lives in Lambeth and is under St Thomas's.

I would have whoever your contact at the hospital is to call the gp ASAP and tell them in no uncertain terms what she needs and to tell them to do the prescription!! Until then surely the hospital can supply enough until she can get a script filled?

The injections must be heparin (clexane or fragmin) as warfarin is tablets. It is true that kings haematologists also can only prescribe a couple of weeks worth and gp then takes it over. The hospital sends a letter specifying what is needed.


The injectable blood thinners do, in due course, get replaced by warfarin which is much cheaper but requires more monitoring (blood tests weekly for eg)


I think the best thing to do is to call the hospital and get the consultants secretary, ensure a letter has been sent to the gp and get a copy then arrange an urgent gp appt. in the meantime, if she has been missing daily injections which are life-saving, sounds as if the hospital perhaps should check her over and prescribe again as a stop gap, if the gp isn't getting things sorted.

Call the haematology dept. at St. Thomas's and explain what happened. They would have taken advice from one of their team if she had blood clots at the hospital. They should also offer to see her because she was treated there. Much better than going to A&E.


Would also call Southwark PCT and report the GP.

I think you should speak to the Team Leader to ask why this happened in the first place and what the protocols are to avoid it happening again - to your relative or to someone else .


The DNT is no doubt under pressure ( so all the more need to have procedures in place ) and I don't feel entirely comfortable criticising them ....but this kind of experience is far from rare and vulnerable people are put at risk by what IME is a system that often breaks down .


Poor communications between DNT and patients and surgeries ,lack of continuity of care ,Health Care assistants who are not properly supported or used in complex cases where greater knowledge/training is needed .


I have made formal complaints in the past and to a limited extent have found that things have improved .

Too many things happened over last 48 hours to detail. I phoned St Thomas's today, they told me to go in and pick up the injection kit, which I have done and a district nurse is going to visit and inject tomorrow. MIL is having oral warfarin as well so not such a huge panic (I didn't know this til today) and her last blood reading early last wk was within normal range but the hosp want to continue the injections until a second within normal range blood result within next few days.


Complaints lodged and me on to our next family trauma ...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...