Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Goodness me - I wonder if his memoirs will be entitled: My own stupidity and it's part in my downfall.


What a prize idiot.


At a time when many are questioning the council's fairness, balance and attitude towards constituents this is not a good look at all - the lengths he went to to undermine a local resident group is shocking.

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Setting-up a fake account for his own ends, I

> wonder which local internet forum he got that idea

> from?...


I know, I wonder if there?s any accounts on here that are like this, like having another identity


Steve Taylor/ Trolley Snatch has gone, but there must be others?!

Perhaps they could save all that hassle of switching between accounts and morph their names Brangelina stylee.


And to save on the cost of a new forum server, single account posters could tandem up to save on bandwidth, e.g. Inaliceatthemoment...

Maybe we could just classify posters into tribes, D&D alignment style, rather than try and find potential duplicate accounts?


There is a bigger issue here about local democracy and the relationship between councillors and constituents, the role of political parties in local government, the amount of whipping that goes on, whether councillors' loyalty / focus is with their ward constituents, their LA political party organisation or their national party organisation. Voters expect them to represent constituency interests, and with the way the system works this is perhaps naive?


Is there a "councillor culture" that doesn't sit well with the formal rules, that happens because every other councillor is acting in a similar manner, so it all seems OK?

Seabag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> diable rouge Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Setting-up a fake account for his own ends, I

> > wonder which local internet forum he got that

> idea

> > from?...

>

> I know, I wonder if there?s any accounts on here

> that are like this, like having another identity

>

> Steve Taylor/ Trolley Snatch has gone, but there

> must be others?!



I know of at least one current poster who has two forum names and has sometimes used both of them on the same thread.


Not a troll though.

Seriously - if you're clever about it or use parody it seems to be allowed.


If you just blatantly try to pretend you are not who you are you're banned from twitter. I'm sure if he ran an obvious parody account it would be allowed even if it had a political persuasion (like Larry does).

Twitter recently has started marking accounts with "This is a UK Government Account" etc.


But it's suspected that the government runs a "boiler room" Social Media operation which is really a large group of fake/bot accounts (a former chairman admitted that this was going live in 2018).


I can only find reference to it here


https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2018/02/24/tories-hire-army-tweeters-take-social-media-fight-labour/

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Twitter recently has started marking accounts with

> "This is a UK Government Account" etc.

>

> But it's suspected that the government runs a

> "boiler room" Social Media operation which is

> really a large group of fake/bot accounts (a

> former chairman admitted that this was going live

> in 2018).

>

> I can only find reference to it here

>

> https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2018/02/24/to

> ries-hire-army-tweeters-take-social-media-fight-la

> bour/


Possibly not just the incumbent government but governments in waiting too.


Still love the Nicola parodies by Janey Godley t

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> I know of at least one current poster who has two

> forum names and has sometimes used both of them on

> the same thread.

>

> Not a troll though.


I can understand someone having separate accounts for say 'business' and 'pleasure' with that well known adage in mind, whereas having multiple 'pleasure' accounts, even if they don't troll, looks sketchy...

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > I know of at least one current poster who has

> two

> > forum names and has sometimes used both of them

> on

> > the same thread.

> >

> > Not a troll though.

>

> I can understand someone having separate accounts

> for say 'business' and 'pleasure' with that well

> known adage in mind, whereas having multiple

> 'pleasure' accounts, even if they don't troll,

> looks sketchy...


Specially posting on their own threads in each ?alter ego?. That?s just odd, tho I suppose there?s a ?Oooo..I?m getting away with this? about it, but it?s still fekn sketchy.

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > I know of at least one current poster who has

> two

> > forum names and has sometimes used both of them

> on

> > the same thread.

> >

> > Not a troll though.

>

> I can understand someone having separate accounts

> for say 'business' and 'pleasure' with that well

> known adage in mind, whereas having multiple

> 'pleasure' accounts, even if they don't troll,

> looks sketchy...


My French isn?t very good, remind me what diable rouge is in English?

nxjen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> My French isn?t very good, remind me what diable

> rouge is in English?


Red Devil, but you already knew that.

Not sure what point you're trying to make, most people who've been on the forum long enough (like yourself) know that's my old account. I stopped using it when I hit 10,000 posts (a 'clique' injoke) and took a break, which was over 3 years ago.

When I returned and set up this account about 6 months later, I deliberately chose DR so people would know it was RD, if I did it again the next time I'd probably choose a Spanish or Italian translation.


I never operated both accounts simultaneously, and even if I had, it would've been fairly obvious to some it was the same person, unlike those posters who have multiple accounts and post under different names, and sometimes in the same thread, which I'm sure you'll agree is a strange thing to do...

Seabag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> diable rouge Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Sue Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> >

> > > I know of at least one current poster who has

> > two

> > > forum names and has sometimes used both of

> them

> > on

> > > the same thread.

> > >

> > > Not a troll though.

> >

> > I can understand someone having separate

> accounts

> > for say 'business' and 'pleasure' with that

> well

> > known adage in mind, whereas having multiple

> > 'pleasure' accounts, even if they don't troll,

> > looks sketchy...

>

> Specially posting on their own threads in each

> ?alter ego?. That?s just odd, tho I suppose

> there?s a ?Oooo..I?m getting away with this? about

> it, but it?s still fekn sketchy.




I agree, it's a very strange thing to do.


I think originally one of the names may have been intended for "business", very loosely defined, but that isn't the case any longer.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Seabag Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > diable rouge Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Sue Wrote:

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > > -----

> > >

> > > > I know of at least one current poster who

> has

> > > two

> > > > forum names and has sometimes used both of

> > them

> > > on

> > > > the same thread.

> > > >

> > > > Not a troll though.

> > >

> > > I can understand someone having separate

> > accounts

> > > for say 'business' and 'pleasure' with that

> > well

> > > known adage in mind, whereas having multiple

> > > 'pleasure' accounts, even if they don't

> troll,

> > > looks sketchy...

> >

> > Specially posting on their own threads in each

> > ?alter ego?. That?s just odd, tho I suppose

> > there?s a ?Oooo..I?m getting away with this?

> about

> > it, but it?s still fekn sketchy.

>

>

>

> I agree, it's a very strange thing to do.

>

> I think originally one of the names may have been

> intended for "business", very loosely defined, but

> that isn't the case any longer.



Well that was useful

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Callout for help from any local experts here. Looking to find out more about the history of the property on the corner of Whateley Road and Ulverscroft road (with the green glazed bricks). Now a residential property, i'm told it was a bottle shop in days gone (the house was built around 1900) by and i'd like to learn more about the history of the business that was once here - name, photos, anything at all really! Seems to be very little from open source research so i'm hoping anyone with history in the area can provide any insight!  Starting here before i contact Southwark Archives or similar orgs to get any information and pictures (any advice here also would be welcome). Thank you
    • Portable ramps are available for businesses to use in this sort of situation, aren't they? I don't know whether one would be suitable for use here, or whether they have the space to store one. Lots of people have  permanent or temporary disabilities which mean they have to use crutches or a wheelchair.
    • I can’t remember where I read that figure but this article in the Grauniad from 2023 discusses Ocado results from 2022. The average shopping cart fell to £118 from £129 the previous year. But Ocado lost £500m that year on approximately 20 million orders (circa 400k orders per week). So, averaging out to £25 lost per order. Ocado pauses building new warehouses as annual losses balloon to £500m | Ocado | The Guardian  Obviously, the £500m loss includes various factors. But Ocado has existed for 25 years and only made a small profit in a couple of those years. The rest have been huge losses. Yet it continues to raise funds and speculation sends the share price up and down. In that respect,  it’s like the UK version of Tesla. Meanwhile, the main growth in the supermarket sector has been for Aldi and Lidl, who do not deliver.
    • download-file.mp4  Is this the sort of thing you are after?   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...