Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Goodness me - I wonder if his memoirs will be entitled: My own stupidity and it's part in my downfall.


What a prize idiot.


At a time when many are questioning the council's fairness, balance and attitude towards constituents this is not a good look at all - the lengths he went to to undermine a local resident group is shocking.

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Setting-up a fake account for his own ends, I

> wonder which local internet forum he got that idea

> from?...


I know, I wonder if there?s any accounts on here that are like this, like having another identity


Steve Taylor/ Trolley Snatch has gone, but there must be others?!

Maybe we could just classify posters into tribes, D&D alignment style, rather than try and find potential duplicate accounts?


There is a bigger issue here about local democracy and the relationship between councillors and constituents, the role of political parties in local government, the amount of whipping that goes on, whether councillors' loyalty / focus is with their ward constituents, their LA political party organisation or their national party organisation. Voters expect them to represent constituency interests, and with the way the system works this is perhaps naive?


Is there a "councillor culture" that doesn't sit well with the formal rules, that happens because every other councillor is acting in a similar manner, so it all seems OK?

Seabag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> diable rouge Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Setting-up a fake account for his own ends, I

> > wonder which local internet forum he got that

> idea

> > from?...

>

> I know, I wonder if there?s any accounts on here

> that are like this, like having another identity

>

> Steve Taylor/ Trolley Snatch has gone, but there

> must be others?!



I know of at least one current poster who has two forum names and has sometimes used both of them on the same thread.


Not a troll though.

Seriously - if you're clever about it or use parody it seems to be allowed.


If you just blatantly try to pretend you are not who you are you're banned from twitter. I'm sure if he ran an obvious parody account it would be allowed even if it had a political persuasion (like Larry does).

Twitter recently has started marking accounts with "This is a UK Government Account" etc.


But it's suspected that the government runs a "boiler room" Social Media operation which is really a large group of fake/bot accounts (a former chairman admitted that this was going live in 2018).


I can only find reference to it here


https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2018/02/24/tories-hire-army-tweeters-take-social-media-fight-labour/

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Twitter recently has started marking accounts with

> "This is a UK Government Account" etc.

>

> But it's suspected that the government runs a

> "boiler room" Social Media operation which is

> really a large group of fake/bot accounts (a

> former chairman admitted that this was going live

> in 2018).

>

> I can only find reference to it here

>

> https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2018/02/24/to

> ries-hire-army-tweeters-take-social-media-fight-la

> bour/


Possibly not just the incumbent government but governments in waiting too.


Still love the Nicola parodies by Janey Godley t

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> I know of at least one current poster who has two

> forum names and has sometimes used both of them on

> the same thread.

>

> Not a troll though.


I can understand someone having separate accounts for say 'business' and 'pleasure' with that well known adage in mind, whereas having multiple 'pleasure' accounts, even if they don't troll, looks sketchy...

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > I know of at least one current poster who has

> two

> > forum names and has sometimes used both of them

> on

> > the same thread.

> >

> > Not a troll though.

>

> I can understand someone having separate accounts

> for say 'business' and 'pleasure' with that well

> known adage in mind, whereas having multiple

> 'pleasure' accounts, even if they don't troll,

> looks sketchy...


Specially posting on their own threads in each ?alter ego?. That?s just odd, tho I suppose there?s a ?Oooo..I?m getting away with this? about it, but it?s still fekn sketchy.

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > I know of at least one current poster who has

> two

> > forum names and has sometimes used both of them

> on

> > the same thread.

> >

> > Not a troll though.

>

> I can understand someone having separate accounts

> for say 'business' and 'pleasure' with that well

> known adage in mind, whereas having multiple

> 'pleasure' accounts, even if they don't troll,

> looks sketchy...


My French isn?t very good, remind me what diable rouge is in English?

nxjen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> My French isn?t very good, remind me what diable

> rouge is in English?


Red Devil, but you already knew that.

Not sure what point you're trying to make, most people who've been on the forum long enough (like yourself) know that's my old account. I stopped using it when I hit 10,000 posts (a 'clique' injoke) and took a break, which was over 3 years ago.

When I returned and set up this account about 6 months later, I deliberately chose DR so people would know it was RD, if I did it again the next time I'd probably choose a Spanish or Italian translation.


I never operated both accounts simultaneously, and even if I had, it would've been fairly obvious to some it was the same person, unlike those posters who have multiple accounts and post under different names, and sometimes in the same thread, which I'm sure you'll agree is a strange thing to do...

Seabag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> diable rouge Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Sue Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> >

> > > I know of at least one current poster who has

> > two

> > > forum names and has sometimes used both of

> them

> > on

> > > the same thread.

> > >

> > > Not a troll though.

> >

> > I can understand someone having separate

> accounts

> > for say 'business' and 'pleasure' with that

> well

> > known adage in mind, whereas having multiple

> > 'pleasure' accounts, even if they don't troll,

> > looks sketchy...

>

> Specially posting on their own threads in each

> ?alter ego?. That?s just odd, tho I suppose

> there?s a ?Oooo..I?m getting away with this? about

> it, but it?s still fekn sketchy.




I agree, it's a very strange thing to do.


I think originally one of the names may have been intended for "business", very loosely defined, but that isn't the case any longer.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Seabag Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > diable rouge Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Sue Wrote:

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > > -----

> > >

> > > > I know of at least one current poster who

> has

> > > two

> > > > forum names and has sometimes used both of

> > them

> > > on

> > > > the same thread.

> > > >

> > > > Not a troll though.

> > >

> > > I can understand someone having separate

> > accounts

> > > for say 'business' and 'pleasure' with that

> > well

> > > known adage in mind, whereas having multiple

> > > 'pleasure' accounts, even if they don't

> troll,

> > > looks sketchy...

> >

> > Specially posting on their own threads in each

> > ?alter ego?. That?s just odd, tho I suppose

> > there?s a ?Oooo..I?m getting away with this?

> about

> > it, but it?s still fekn sketchy.

>

>

>

> I agree, it's a very strange thing to do.

>

> I think originally one of the names may have been

> intended for "business", very loosely defined, but

> that isn't the case any longer.



Well that was useful

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I’m not a Gail’s fan but there’s no reason a business shouldn’t open on Christmas Day. However, nobody should be compelled to work the day which, given the widespread coverage of Gail’s questionable employment practices, has to be a possibility here.  The only business I ever use on the 25th is maybe a pub and that’s a rarity these days but buses running would be very welcome for visiting etc. But the swings in the park should definitely remain chained up. Are parks even open on Christmas Day?
    • To be honest, pal, it's not good being a fan of a local business and then not go there. One on hand, the barber shop literally next door to Romeo Jones started serving coffee. The Crown and Greyhound and Rocca serve coffee. Redemption Coffee opened up not far away, and then also Megan's next door to that. DVillage was serving coffee (but wasn't very popular), as was Au Ciel (which is). Maybe also Heritage Cheese, I don't know. There's also Flotsam and Jetsam doing coffee and sandwiches at Dulwich Picture Gallery in the other direction. The whole of Dulwich Village serves coffee. And yet on the other hand, there are enough punters to support all good coffee shops. With the exception of Rocca and Megan's (which are both big spaces) and C&G (which does coffee like everything else - slow and with bad service), all these places regularly get queues out the door. Gail's often has big queues and yet very few people crossed the street to Romeo Jones (which was much better)... Half the staff at Gail's are perfectly fine and efficient. The other half are pretty offhand and rude. It's certainly not welcoming or friendly service. But they're certainly hard working, and no doubt raking the money in for Luke Johnson...
    • Well according to a newspaper article, Gail’s is opening 10 shops in London,,, yup Dulwich is named 10/5 I seem to recall with others in London opening at 7 am…!, Guess that is to capture workers coming off all night shift. Offering free mince pies until they run out.. So very sad to hear about Romeo Jones… been a customer since the opening, any idea where Patrick has gone or details… please pm me.    What is going to be in its place…. Will be around in Jan…umm village is changing….
    • interesting the police said "the car was in demand at the moment" what make/model is that?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...