Jump to content

Please sign & Share Ghost's Law - Kittens must be vaccinated and checked by vet before they?re sold


Recommended Posts

Found via Nextdoor

I applaud Jane please do sign and share.

Jane Sarah

Please help.??PLEASE SIGN THIS PETITION TO HELP SAVE OUR KITTENS??(reposted)

?Ghosts law? is in honour of my little kitten who died at the age of 7 months.

I took Ghost for her vaccinations in November

When I took Ghost to the vet, the vet came out 5 minutes later and said I?m sorry but your kitten has only got 2 days to live, she has a heart murmur. Quickly, I took her to the Royal Veterinary College. They confirmed my little Ghost had advanced right-sided heart failure. Sadly, Ghost died one month later.

I want to help leave Ghost a legacy. ?Ghosts law? states that ALL kittens are checked by a vet before sold. Many breeders with a license take their kittens to be checked before they are sold. However, many people slip through this. They do so by saying they have less than three litters a year and they do not make a profit.

I understand there is ?Lucy?s Law? however, what I am asking for is different.

Under this law, kittens will be checked alongside their mother (of course for strays where the mum is not around, this does not apply) to ensure both the kitten and mum are well. If the mum shows signs of illness, I want it to be the law that she must be spayed and not be stressed by having another litter, as this is specifically targeting backyard breeders who are making their cats have litter after litter.

Having all kittens checked before they?re sold will allow potential owners time to start treatment for their kittens. This will help things like a heart murmur or cat flu being noticed. All I am asking for is all kittens have an ?MOT? check before they are sold. Some people have said this will lead to sick kittens being abandoned. No, it won?t, many people like me would actively buy a sick kitten to love and look after. This ensures the potential owner knows about the health of the kitten, licensed breeders are required to do this anyway so I don?t know why it should be different for backyard breeders. There will always be people who breed for money and there will always be people with a story similar to mine, with this petition if we make it a bit harder for backyard breeders it might help to protect animals more.

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/561785

Link to the petition

I don?t know where this journey with the petition will take me, I might fail but I have to at least try to protect other kittens. Please sign and share.

Please copy and paste if you wish to share.

Sighed it horrible that people can do this to any animal and like unlawful dog breeders the mother is usually bread to death

I think animal charity could do more for people to get there pets from them

Years ago I wanted a kitten they wouldn't let me because I lived in flat even though I had two before Which lived until 19 and 20 so ended up going to a pet shop

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I would imagine that the evidence shows that protein powder is not suitable for under 18s whatever the brand.  Staff should’ve known that.
    • I'm not sure it's sensible  to presume any agreement from interlocutors, but if you do, then I do agree that it's the right thing to say so. My own guess -- it's nothing more -- is that the officers were acting just to effect an arrest on arrival, as requested, quite possibly without any knowledge of the content of wretched tweet at all*, and that their being armed was absolutely incidental.  But I don't know any reliable facts. I do think the turning up (5?) en masse to do so was possibly complacent and unthinking, if there was no reason to believe the arrestee was a threat.  If they had  been doing so for good reason, I guess they could have had at least one weapon trained at him, and had  him hands above head or on the ground in no time.  But I know no reliable facts of the incident whatsoever.  Perhaps they were Father Ted fans -- seriously -- and trogged along, on a quiet afternoon, to see the man himself.  Perhaps they and/or their CO will get a severe bollocking from above.  I don't know. * But even that with some reservations.  The last time I looked up cases on wrongful arrest, years ago, I think I remember there being held then to be at least some onus on the acting arresting officer to be satisfied that  the required grounds for a lawful arrest  did exist.  And I don't know any of the facts of the present case. 
    • They carry guns at the airport.  It may not make it ok but that is a fact.  In France and America they all carry guns.
    • TfL and the Met had a small team a few years ago dedicated to addressing bike theft.  https://tfl.gov.uk/info-for/media/press-releases/2011/february/officers-target-bike-thieves-and-successfully-reunite-stolen-bikes-with-their-owners I assume that went with austerity. There is now a Task Force https://www.london.gov.uk/who-we-are/what-london-assembly-does/questions-mayor/find-an-answer/metropolitan-police-service-cycle-taskforce And some advice from the MPS: https://www.met.police.uk/cp/crime-prevention/keeping-vehicles-safe/how-safe-is-your-bike/ The marking service is good and helps.  As a cyclist you do your best to minimise the likelihood and I would never leave a high end bike locked on the street out of sight.  I've had three bikes stolen in London over the last two decades. Gum Tree sadly makes it too easy and for every bike theft there is someone knowingly or unknowingly prepared to buy a bargain that is stolen.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...