Jump to content

Recommended Posts

wish they had. Much as I like to see schools on public transport Goose Green's adult led, mass sing off on the top deck of the 176 was more than I could bear. I'm sure the intention was good but they seemed just fine -chatting, looking out of the window - excellent behaviour in fact.
They were singing something about a spider and then the wheels on the bus led by an adult - all 30 of them. The thing is - I do think its great that schools use public transport and I like sharing my journey to work with a school trip and this group were very well behaved - it was just very annoying (an a terrible example pf how one behaves on a bus!).
oh dear, my son was one of the 30! The other half of reception is going tomorrow, I was going to offer to go with them as it's my day off but was told in no uncertain terms by my son not to come.. I can mention to the teachers if you like in the morning.
Cheerful teachers leading a group of 5 year olds in a bout of impromptu singing on a bus? tsk, tsk, tsk - what is the world coming to?? Surely children need to be educated in the correct bus etiquette in London i.e. no smiling at strangers and instead, maintain a distainful and aloof expression on one's face at all times. This isn't one of those kind, cheerful friendly places to live after all - we're not Canadians for goodness sakes!

As I said - I've no objection to a mass invasion of a bus by children - on the contrary - I relish it! I like the chat and hubbub and the disruption of the normal atmosphere. Seemed rather like an inhibition of normal chatty social behaviour (the adult making the children sing) actually and, no, I don't think it's a good idea to pretend a bus is a school - especially when the children's instinct was to behave like they should on a bus.


It was just after 9.


Correct bus ettiquette is surely consideration of your fellow travellers? The children did this naturally, didn't seem restless or bored by the journey - as I said, their behaviour was exemplary and any parents / school should be proud of them - they were lovely. I'm guessing that the adult (I've no idea if it was a teacher or not) was nervous about the children starting to get bored etc and wanted to offset any restlessness - we could have a whole other conversation about that - but I couldn't see that at all (and, boy, do I know the signs).



,

Great to hear such positive comments about the kids behaviour! Good behaviour is a core value at the school. The teachers are committed & enthusiastic & music is used through the school (I.e whole school singing once a week) & class teaching (in addition to weekly music classes, instrumental tuition & afterschool choir/brass band etc)- I really love that enthusiasm but I can see your perspective! Will pass on this discussion to relevant people.

Ha, ha, exactly.


Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You don't want to teach kids to be friendly and

> chatty on the bus in the morning. It will lead to

> them being hated in adult life.

>

> I hate bumping in to people in the morning.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Rant ahead: You're not one of them but unfortunately, there's a substrate of posters here that do very little except moan and come up with weird conspiracy theories. They're immediately highly critical of just about any change, and their initial assumption is that everyone else is a total fucking contemptible idiot. For example: don't you think that the people who run the libraries will have considered the impact of timing of reconstruction on library users? (In fact, we know they have - because they've made arrangements at other libraries to attempt to mitigate the disruption). After all, these are the people that spend their whole working week thinking about libraries and dealing with library users (and the kids especially). You don't go into the library game for the chicks and fame - so it's fair to assume that librarians are committed to public service and public access to libraries, including by kids. Likewise the built environment people (engineers, architects, construction managers, project managers, construction contractors, subcontractors or whoever is on this job) are told to minimise disruption on every job they do. The thing that occurs to us as amateurs within 30 seconds of us seeing something is probably not something a full time professional hasn't thought about! Southwark Council, the NHS, TfL, Dulwich Estate, Thames Water, Openreach - they're not SPECTRE factories filled with malevolent chaosmongers trying to persecute anyone. They're mostly filled with people who understand their job and try to do their best with what they've been given - just like all of us. Nobody is perfect or immune from challenge, and that's fair enough, but why not at least start from the assumption that there's a good reason why things have been done the way they have? Any normal person would be pleased that their busy, pretty, lively local library is getting refurbished, and will have more space and facilities for kids and teens, and will be more efficient to run and warmer in winter. But no, EDT_Forumite_752 had kids who did an exam 20 years ago, and this makes them an expert on library refurbishment who can see it's all just stuff and nonsense for the green agenda and why can't it all be put off... 😡😡😡
    • I completely misread the previous post, sorry. For some reason I thought the mini cooper was also a police vehicle, DUH.
    • This has given me ideas for the ginger wine I love, that no one else likes!      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...