Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Ive just received a fine for parking in the TJC for 14 minutes while I sat in the car. I had delivered my daughter for an emergency blood test and she asked me to wait. I read the signage and couldn't see anything about not being allowed to park there. If I had I would have parked in a residential street. Mind you I was a bit stressed and worried. My daughter as a result ended up in A&E later that evening- its OK, she was alright in the end. Can anyone clarify the rules on this? It was extremely misleading signage.
my daughter went into the reception area - it wouldnt have occurred to her. She is not a driver and was already upset. I was in the car. I would have registered it if I had seen that signage. I didn't get out of the car.Literally pulled in and then pulled out when she came back.

Sorry for your distress Huggers. And thanks for keeping your post rational and factual.


From the perspective of someone who has had a few tickets over the years I found that you have to be philosophical and take it on the chin. But it took me decades to reach this position! I've fought tickets in the past but never won - went through to an appeals to be told that they agreed with me that it was an innocent error (signage, ownership of the car park, time of day, weather) it was still properly issued.


If you consider that the signage could be improved contact them with positive suggestions - whilst old fashioned from time to time I still send a letter as unlike web based/e-mail more likely to be read (I'm talking about you BBC).


My personal view also depends on the size of the penalty - up to ?40 it is "oh well", above that I question whether it is proportionate. Contacting the health trust, MP or whoever could be worthwhile. There was a commitment in the last Cameron manifesto to tackle excessive parking fees, I expect that this was aimed at the private clampers. I was clamped once, I digress. Writing to your MP asking them to take action about penalties that are excessive may be worthwhile, although not sure how high this is on the political agenda at the moment. Lot of interest on NHS parking fees before election.


There is a political point on proportionality in that a bigger agenda should be ensuring better driving standards - it's 'OK' to drive dangerously but if you park in the wrong place, woe betide you. I separately had a battle with another local authority about parking enforcement - most seems to be 9 - 5 Monday to Friday, allowing those on a night out to park where they like. Yes, the Banqueting Hall in Forest Hill, I am talking about you (noting this is aimed at the customers, as the business do have signage saying there is a free car park 3 minutes away).

When I had my first jab there, the first question asked by the volunteer/welcoming guy was 'Have you parked in the car park'?


I think for this very reason.


It needs to be exceptionally clear, it's a health centre. People are likely to be ill/stressed/distracted.

thank you Malambu. The fine is ?85 and ?50 if paid immediately. I do usually cough up and I can see they would not know my reasoning. Its just a machine reading my numberplate.

It was unfortunate that I was literally dropping her off and pulled into a space and she was upset and asked me to wait. Of course if I had read the sign properly I would have given my reg to reception. But I did look at the immediate signage because I wondered if I was allowed to park and it just said who the car park belonged to. It is very annoying as I then had to pay the congestion charge to take her into ST Thomas's where she was referred for a GP appointment at 8pm- a very expensive day.

As it is a free car park I wouldnt think the centre would want people to be penalised like this.

Ah here we are - on the autism web page but not on the hospital web page.


Parking:

A few parking spaces are available at the center (East Dulwich Grove entrance). Please remember to enter your number plate details in reception for free parking.


https://www.londonearlyautismdiagnosis.com/how-to-find-us-tjhc

When I was there the other day (on foot), my first thought was "ooh, I wonder if I can drive/park here in the future". So I checked the signage in the car park, and it said you have to register your vehicle in reception. So to be honest, I think it is pretty clear, and you'll probably struggle to fight this one.

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 37 bus for me when I go down for my blood pressure

> - I think maybe only those who need to should

> drive.

>

> It's not a joke that it goes up if you get

> stressed is it - so no stress for me.



Maddeningly we are walking distance but daughter was not in good state

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 37 bus for me when I go down for my blood pressure

> - I think maybe only those who need to should

> drive.

>

> It's not a joke that it goes up if you get

> stressed is it - so no stress for me.


If you were to walk, which I think is quite doable for you, it will be even lower

they could possibly put a large sign up on the gates


I suppose it's logical that you would have to register, otherwise it would be used by everyone for general parking.


I would be inclined to contact them and explain your situation and see if they'll let you off.

I was perturbed by a report back in November about someone else's charge, https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,2164086,#msg-2166483, and had a look around myself few days later. I'll write about that later, when I've compared what I saw then with what's available now.


There are about half a dozen different service providers using the building. I think you're going to have to find an administrator there who is responsible for the premises themselves, and ask them to cancel the charge, which I think would be a wholly reasonable thing for them to do. If it was the GP surgery that was visited, perhaps they would be the best first port of call. It would be interesting to know how many other cases there may have been.

Why can't they just give you an hour or 90 minutes free parking without the hassle of registering at a time when your mind might be on other things?


That would cover most medical visits - presumably what they want to do is stop commuters parking there all day and the cameras already in situ could police that.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
    • I guess its the thing these days to demonstrate an attitude, in this instance seemingly of the negative kind, instead of taking pride in your work and have standards then 🤷‍♀️
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...