Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The government has confirmed its ?exploring further restrictions? around foie gras following reports that ministers were drafting legislation to ban imports.


But in all honesty, does anyone believe this government actually cares a fcuk about geese being fattened up for thier livers, or is this an (obvious) post Brexit attack on the French.


Nothing like getting the French farming industry riled up for good effect.


The UK imports around 200 tonnes a year currently.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/279946-foie-gras2021/
Share on other sites

It's virtue signalling basically.


It should also prompt some creative thinking about other barriers that could be created to limit imports of items from the EU post Brexit.


Exports from the UK have been plagued with nit-picking (and penalties) by French/Dutch/Irish Customs officials since January. The latest, as mentioned by the BBC R4 today, is the case of second-hand clothes being exported by UK charities to Eastern Europe where they are recycled or sent to developing countries. Because some of the clothes came from say Bangladesh or China many years ago, they are still classed as non-UK and non-EU manufactured. So the containers have to be unstuffed, contents inspected and then import duty is imposed.


If these sort of spiteful and petty tactics persist then it becomes inevitable that the UK will retaliate. Then nobody wins.

I like it very much and I like this way very much too


https://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2016/08/01/487088946/this-spanish-farm-makes-foie-gras-without-force-feeding?t=1616166998860


The rest is virtue signalling wrapped up in silly self built foot shooting Brexit culture war, invoked by a tedious populist wankfest of a government.


Getting on and sorting out the real problems of this Brexit farce would be more productive. But then again, that would involve some self reflection.

  • 10 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...