Saying the election had been stolen was pretty provocative wouldn't you say?
Pardoning the rioters would suggest that he agreed with them. Wouldn't you say?
Being an apologist for leaders of a country who execute political enemies, is a sad reflection of civilisation. Wouldn't you say?
Whether the above stands up in a court of law is another question but surely it is obvious to most of us.
"His speech did repeatedly call on people to fight."
If that were true there would have been no need for the BBC to splice together two sections of his speech that were uttered 53 minutes apart.
They could have just used a clip from one of the times he actually said it. If it were true.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.