Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have run locally for years and I have never seen rats like this year. I now see them most times I go up Cox's Walk and I saw a big one last week on College Road outside DUCKS. Other runners I speak to have also noticed a big increase this spring.


There are definitely more rats this year.

Countrlass22 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Rats are not

> wildlife


Sorry, but rats and rodents most definitely are wildlife, and provide food for certain predators like hawks. The problem is that they can become a pest if they overpopulate, and food supply is the main driver of that.

Yes, I am pleased not to have seen litter there, at least when I was there last a few weeks ago. This is not the case in most of the streets off LL and FH Road, unfortunately. Much has to be from schoolchildren going to and from school (but at least they're not in cars!) as there are a lot of energy drink/Lucozade/milkshake cans and bottles. Luckily, there are good litter pickers, both those employed by the council and volunteers.

Countrlass22 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sorry no they absolutely are not wildlife there

> vermin they carry discease hence we have such

> thing as immediate council response teams rather

> control.

>

>

> U need learn whats actually wildlife and whats a

> pest carrying discease lol


Any wild animal is wildlife. That includes rats and other rodents. Bats carry more diseases than any other living animal by the way. Are you going to argue they are not wildlife too? And what about humans? They carry and transmit disease all over the place, and it could be argued are the biggest pest on the planet. Bacteria on the other hand, doesn't even need a living host to spread.


But back to rats. I grew up on a farm, so know very well at what point wildlife becomes a pest. Why do you think rodents exist? Birds of prey, weasels, snakes, all feed on rodents. Rats in turn, are scavengers. They also spread seeds in woodland, stores they hoard and forget about. This helps new forest undergrowth to sprout. So you see, they do actually serve a purpose in the ecosystem. Wildlife becomes a pest when it over populates and disrupts that ecosystem. That is as true for insects that destroy crops, as it is for rodents that sometimes spread disease.


All that any pest control can do, is regulate the numbers. The most effective way to keep the rodent population in check, is for people to not leave easily accessible food and garbage for them to eat. Towns and cities are very attractive spaces for rodents for that reason. But any idea that all rats should be exterminated as pests, is ignorant. And woodland is in fact, the one place you want to see them, for the reason I cite above.

You are never more than aabout 10 ft from a rat in london.

The Council will only deal with them for free if you are incouncil propert. When living in owned house I thought that we had one under the kitchen floor, wan a sizeable payment, and it was a 3 week wait, this was las November.

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> jazzer Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > bit of a trek from ED station too cox's walk

> even

> > for a rat!!

>

> They can get a bus up Lordship Lane


Don't be silly, there's no way a rat would be able to get on a bus. How would they get credit on their Oyster cards?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
    • Ah, thanks,  it all comes flooding back. I've actually been to the Hastings shop, I'd forgotten all about it, along with her name! Didn't she (in between?)  take over what  was then The Magnolia, previously The Magdala, now The Lordship, with her then partner? Or is that some figment of my imagination?  In fact, didn't they transform it from The Magdala (much missed) to The Magnolia? With flowery wallpaper covering the front of the bar? Which reminds me of the pub's brief period after The Magnolia  as the ill-conceived and ill-fated The Patch.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...