Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Tories are saying "he's on a final warning"


But in reality... there can't be long if they want to win next election.


If election is in 2024 there are 2 more years of Johnson with all that that entails - they surely don't want that


But if they do want someone else leading them by next election they have to make the change soon and embed WhoEver in good time


But even in doing that, that's the 4th leader of the ELECTED party we will have had in nearly as many years - can they honestly claim to rule the country until 2024?


(and that's before you get into the further realities of Brexit hitting, Scottish indie calls yada yada)


Whole thing looks shaky as to me

Tories are saying "he's on a final warning"


But in reality... there can't be long if they want to win next election.



Indeed, but it might even be too late for that, as a rather big, dark slow-moving Covid/Brexit cloud has appeared called rising living costs.


I think electorally they might already be screwed...

?Get your act together or it?s over, MPs warn Boris Johnson?


-Surely they realise that this is Johnson with his ?act together?


-And then you?ve got enabler?s like IDS projecting the blame on anyone other than the man of chaos himself. Hardly surprising it?s a sh*t show around number 10.


Sir Iain Duncan-Smith, the former party leader, said Johnson was having to defend other people?s mistakes. ?No prime minister or president can govern if they spend their whole time having to defend what others have got wrong and failed on,? he told the BBC. ?It is a mistake to have him bogged down in having to justify and defend things that are often unjustifiable.?


https://apple.news/AVIwQDV2jSlKlih9UBJFdOg

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Dan Hodges (Mail on Sunday opinion writer) hasn't

> heard of tactical voting...

>

> On the by-election. Disastrous result for Boris.

> But a pretty terrible result for Starmer as well.


Dan Hodges is weirdly obsessed with how badly Labour are doing. Presumably it?s down to him being the kid of a Labour MP, but even so he really needs to let it go.

> North Shropshire....the beginning of the end?

> The middle of the end? Or the end of the end?


By happy coincidence, it's the place where in 1987 dear leader married his first wife, Allegra Mostyn-Owen. Her family seat was at West Belton and they married in the local church.

A couple of points picked up in the by-election aftermath...


Postal votes which were cast before the Partygate revelations broke, were heavily in Lib Dems favour, suggesting they didn't play a significant role in people's thinking/voting.


Rather, NS is a strong rural/farming area, lots of unhappiness about Brexit being bad for UK farmers as witnessed in the detail of the recent Australia/NZ trade deals.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In 2016 London City Airport began using concentrated flight paths. When there's a predominantly westerly wind, incoming aircraft approach from East London (north of the River). When there's a predominantly Easterly wind, incoming aircraft approach the airport from the West: circling through Forest Hill, Dulwich, Vauxhall, Tower Hamlets, Docklands. This latter flight path affects many of us in South East London. https://www.london.gov.uk/who-we-are/what-london-assembly-does/questions-mayor/find-an-answer/london-city-airport-concentrated-flight-paths The planes going into City are often below 2,000 ft, so very noisy. Sometimes we have incoming Heathrow at the same time, flying higher. The early flights that I hear e.g. 04:30 are incoming to Heathrow. They are scheduled to land at 05:30 but are 'early'. Apparently the government allows a percentage of flights to arrive early and late (but these are now established as regular occurrences, informally part of the schedule). IMHO Londoners are getting very poor political representation on this issue. Incredible that if you want to complain about aircraft noise, you're supposed to contact the airport concerned! Preposterous and designed solely in favour of aviation expansion.
    • Yet another recommendation for Jafar. Such a nice guy, really reliable and fair. He fixed a problem with our boiler and then incredibly kindly made two more visits to replace a different part at no extra cost. 
    • I didn't have any problems with plane noise until city airport started flying planes to and from about 5-8 minutes apart from 5.30 am or  6 am,  and even with ear plugs and double glazing I am woken at about 6 well before I usually would wake  up. I have lived here since 1986 and it is relatively recently that the planes have been flying far too low over East dulwich. I very much doubt that they are headinbg to Heathrow or from Heathrow. As the crow flies we are much , MUCH closer to City Airport than Heathrow or Gatwick. I even saw one flying so low you could see all the windows, when I was in Peckham Rye Park.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...