Jump to content

Recommended Posts

If only he?s followed Rory?s advice.


Hancock believes himself, even when he?s tinkered with his story to fit. But his worst trait is his ?I?m saving lives? schtick, that stinks of disingenuous opportunist deflection.


Anyways https://apple.news/A6WTgxm1ASqC4GKOWAaEANQ I still think this guy was the last of the decent ones.

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This select committee performance is telling:

> https://twitter.com/woodstoday/status/974661965346

> 934784?s=20


He (Hancock) is a horrible little turd.


And even in amongst a cabinet and government of other turds, he stands out.

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> LOL Drip Drip from Cummings who no-one should let

> into a WhatsApp group ever again.

>

> Hancock must be fuming but he's not showing it.


The depressing thing is, it's all 'priced in' with our Vote Leave government. People seem to know and accept that they're dishonest and incompetent, but still prefer them to any of the alternatives. None of it makes any difference

Seabag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> rahrahrah Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > This select committee performance is telling:

> >

> https://twitter.com/woodstoday/status/974661965346

>

> > 934784?s=20

>

> He (Hancock) is a horrible little turd.

>

> And even in amongst a cabinet and government of

> other turds, he stands out.


Think it is quite appropriate language, I'd normally argue the other way! Who was saying about polishing a turd - something to do with the Brexit deal?

He's apologised but not going to resign even though he broke COVID rules.


Interesting how different this is from John Major's years - no-one cares he's having an affair (it's his own business) - but everyone cares if he's appointed someone because "she's a mate" or broken COVID rules.

Strange how memories go - I listed Gummer as an example of a scandal but I must have been wrong so deleted it - all I can find is -


"At the Suffolk Boat Show on 16 May 1990, then agriculture secretary John Gummer tried to feed his four-year-old daughter Cordelia a burger.


THE STUNT backfired horribly. Cordelia refused to eat it and the whole incident only heightened concern about BSE and reinforced public cynicism about politicians? pronouncements on food safety."


who sucked the toe - was it Mellor ?

Sephiroth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> interesting how different this is from when one

> Matt Hancock was calling for Neil Fergusons

> resignation for exactly this just last year


SO he calls for others to go AND apparently be prosecuted (if Sky News are right)


But when it's him an apology will do.

I love the fact that everyone is calling it a private matter. Even though the video is from his offices at 3 in the afternoon on a Thursday. He also hired his 'long term friend' using taxpayers money. He also broke the social distancing rules that it was his role to create and enforce. How is it not about what he was doing in his job exactly?

Sephiroth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mellor was the story - but I don't think it was

> ever a real thing - an concoction by Max Clifford

> is my recollection


Mellor in his Chelsea kit also did the rounds.


Fergie (the Royal one) put toe sucking on the map...

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Interesting how different this is from John

> Major's years - no-one cares he's having an

> affair...


I don't think people would've been too bothered back then either, it's just that Major made a big point about 'Back to Basics', which included family values, which was tantamount to giving the press a fully loaded gun...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • How on earth can someone like this be allowed to continue as a solicitor? Can't be just be struck off, or the equivalent?
    • There are no road works in front of Cod fellas and yesterday when I requested a stop there the driver went straight past and never stopped untill Avondale Riss. As cars have to stop because of the lights why can busses not do this? 1 minute Bloodly mindedness.
    • These are the smokeless fuels you can burn on a open fireplace in Southwark: https://smokecontrol.defra.gov.uk/fuels-php/england/ https://www.southwark.gov.uk/planning-environment-and-building-control/environment/air-quality/reduce-air-pollution/reduce-smoke
    • Thanks all, our hope was (despite the diminishing estate) he would get on with it.  Progress is glacial, it's been two years since probate was granted, that's two cold and damp winters with no heating, and not surprisingly a pipe burst. He's blames the issues on the estate agent, who separately had a dispute with him, he had a wobbly when one of the beneficiaries spoke to the estate agent.  Separately he said it was the family's fault for letting the property get into a poor condition.  It was dated, but certainly not in poor condition. There are two five star reviews on Google, and five one star: ** WARNING** This solicitor firm has to be one of the worst I have encountered. The solicitor is prehistoric in his practices and will carry out work at his own snails pace, the fax machine he uses gets turned off at 2 pm and its near impossible to get him on the phone. STAY AWAY, YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED, check the solicitors ombudsman, this firm has previous bad practice recorded.   Disgusting under no circumstances use this solicitor.For over 10 years he has not carried out the terms of a Will he has not re-invested money but has retained it.  He writes letters which are pure "Flannel" excuses for doing nothing.  You have been warned   shocking experience, delayed the whole process, told other side solicitors to not contact him as he feels pressured etc. never use.   Not fit for 21st century. No website, no email address, no electronic transfer. Very slow, very little communication.   Was not a pleasant experience dealing with this firm    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...