Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi all, I've had a response back from TFL via council officers.

In summary:



1.Green Man: effectively, the green man may only be visible for 4 seconds but traffic is held until pedestrians are clear (up to 12 seconds) - this is the standard on new signal junctions. IMO not ideal, but as it's TFLs standard, my hands are tied over this.


2. audible signal is on order but not yet installed. It is not installed as standard at junctions (as opposed to stand alone crossings), it was requested by Council Officers as it's not standard, so this is why it's coming in later.


3. the near-side green man is the current standard design. It has at times been controversial and takes some getting used to but it is thought to be safer.


4. this will vary during the day as the signals are demand responsive.


5.The above ground detectors that have been installed to detect vehicles on all approaches have an operational range of up to 60m. Their alignment was checked during the commissioning and all of these devices were detecting vehicles on all approaches well before the advanced cycle stop lines for cyclists.



Actual response from TFL:

1. The timings currently employed at this site are in accordance with the latest Transport for London (TfL) standards. The invitation to cross period, as indicated by the green man, appears for 4 seconds. This allows pedestrians to establish themselves on the crossing. Once this period has expired, there are detectors in place which will hold the traffic light to vehicles on red until the crossing point is clear of pedestrians or until a maximum time is reached. The total time allowed for pedestrians to cross the road is 12 seconds, this is the same amount of time as prior to the modification work. However, if members of the public are concerned then we can obviously look at amending the timings to give pedestrians more time if you feel it would be beneficial.


2. Incorporating an audible signal for pedestrians is assessed on a site by site basis and is not necessarily done as standard as it has the potential to be extremely dangerous. However, at your request an audible signal will be installed. However, you were advised that this would not be done so in time for the commissioning. The additional parts required have been ordered and once the installation company have received them a time and date will be arranged for this work to be completed.


3. The nearside pedestrian signal was requested by the Borough. It is positioned so that when waiting pedestrians are looking at oncoming traffic the pedestrian signal is clearly visible. It also helps to remove any confusion/indecision as when far sided pedestrian signals are used, there is a potential that those crossing the road may be tempted to change their mind when the signal changes. In this situation, as soon as a pedestrian steps in to the carriageway they no longer see a signal and so will keep crossing until they reach the other side.


4. The traffic signals are demand dependant so how these lights operate depends upon the demands that are present and when the demands are made.



Renata

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • DD, "Rejoice rejoice. It's a pity he and his fellow clowns were completely annihilated at the ballot box. I mean they were doing so well after all 🙃🙃" At least the economy and unemployment weren't in the mess they are now. What is it, give the public sector a whopping pay increase with no strings attached, double the black hole and then blame it on the last Govt. Give me strength. Rachel from accounts shouldn't be anywhere near the economy. The final straw was increasing employer NI contributions and look how that's worked out. Month on month both inflation and unemployment have risen. Won't be long before inflation and u/e are exceeding 5%, but guess what, They'll blame Sunak and go.  Lets have a snap election right NOW, then see how poorly Starmer, Reeves and Rainer do. They're already plotting to get rid of Starmer, and if you think its bad now, you ain't seen nothing yet. Oh and did I mention Starmer wanting to stop Freedom of Speech............................................Normal people can see right through what him and co are doing, great at spending other peoples money, him and co don't have = bankruptcy. We'll just repeat the economic collapse that happened in Greece and wasn't it in Italy as well?
    • One of the best of Shakespeare 's plays.  I did Othello for A level. Also seen a number of stage and film versions. Is there any specific aspects of the play that is difficult for your daughter to understand?  
    • @Sue think this is your quote.  It wasn't binary, good Vs bad, and Corbyn had a lot of popular support, as evidenced by the previous election. He had aot of good policies, some picked up by others since. He was defeated by a mixture of a right wing press,good targeting the Johnson 'Get Brexit Done" and for some that Johnson was a funny loveable rogue/fool/liar/philander/opportunist.  I wouldn't see choosing the perceived least worst candidate out of the two major parties as being "good sense'.  We imagine that Corbyn would have been terrible, but we don't know.  He would have taken a stronger line against Israel in Gaza, not sucked up to Trump nut on Russia?  Would the UK be better for that?
    • We have had 4 greyhounds - the last one, a bitch, was not speyed so we  had to pay for that at our local vet.  Only one dog was nervous around children and only one was cat friendly.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...