Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi all, I've had a response back from TFL via council officers.

In summary:



1.Green Man: effectively, the green man may only be visible for 4 seconds but traffic is held until pedestrians are clear (up to 12 seconds) - this is the standard on new signal junctions. IMO not ideal, but as it's TFLs standard, my hands are tied over this.


2. audible signal is on order but not yet installed. It is not installed as standard at junctions (as opposed to stand alone crossings), it was requested by Council Officers as it's not standard, so this is why it's coming in later.


3. the near-side green man is the current standard design. It has at times been controversial and takes some getting used to but it is thought to be safer.


4. this will vary during the day as the signals are demand responsive.


5.The above ground detectors that have been installed to detect vehicles on all approaches have an operational range of up to 60m. Their alignment was checked during the commissioning and all of these devices were detecting vehicles on all approaches well before the advanced cycle stop lines for cyclists.



Actual response from TFL:

1. The timings currently employed at this site are in accordance with the latest Transport for London (TfL) standards. The invitation to cross period, as indicated by the green man, appears for 4 seconds. This allows pedestrians to establish themselves on the crossing. Once this period has expired, there are detectors in place which will hold the traffic light to vehicles on red until the crossing point is clear of pedestrians or until a maximum time is reached. The total time allowed for pedestrians to cross the road is 12 seconds, this is the same amount of time as prior to the modification work. However, if members of the public are concerned then we can obviously look at amending the timings to give pedestrians more time if you feel it would be beneficial.


2. Incorporating an audible signal for pedestrians is assessed on a site by site basis and is not necessarily done as standard as it has the potential to be extremely dangerous. However, at your request an audible signal will be installed. However, you were advised that this would not be done so in time for the commissioning. The additional parts required have been ordered and once the installation company have received them a time and date will be arranged for this work to be completed.


3. The nearside pedestrian signal was requested by the Borough. It is positioned so that when waiting pedestrians are looking at oncoming traffic the pedestrian signal is clearly visible. It also helps to remove any confusion/indecision as when far sided pedestrian signals are used, there is a potential that those crossing the road may be tempted to change their mind when the signal changes. In this situation, as soon as a pedestrian steps in to the carriageway they no longer see a signal and so will keep crossing until they reach the other side.


4. The traffic signals are demand dependant so how these lights operate depends upon the demands that are present and when the demands are made.



Renata

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi, Just a quick note to say it's six months since I launched Eats Dulwich. In that time I've reviewed 28 restaurants. Usually four or five a month except for a month when I came down with gout, which I guess is an occupational hazard. Don't say I don't suffer for my art. Early on someone – Sue, I think – asked me what I'm going to do when I've reviewed every restaurant in East Dulwich. I'm nowhere near that point, but what I have found is that a lot of new openings have tended to be in Rye Lane, so the site has expanded to cover SE15, hence the slight change of name (still haven't had any cease and desist letters from anything with a similar name).  Anyway, the site is still free, it would be great if as many readers as possible here can subscribe so that they automatically get new posts (when you try to subscribe the default might be paid subs but that's down to Substack, just tick the free option instead) as I don't post everything on EDF. Obviously you can get reviews elsewhere if you want, but I think this is the only proper site for local East Dulwich people written by a local East Dulwich person. If you like eating out please have a read. And if there are other places you think I should visit please mention them below and i'll do my best to try them. Link here: https://eatsdulwich.substack.com/  
    • Can you explain what your point was, then? Because it isn't clear to me. No. Perhaps you could provide a link and explain its relevance? That would be helpful     Those figures suggest that over 10,000,000 voters were not "rejecting a far left party."
    • Anyone can deliver for Evri - my daughter having just passed her driving test tried Evri to make some money - they basically give you a route and as many parcels as they think you can cope with - you make money for each one you deliver, so you can imagine - speed is the priority. Why would they wait for you to answer the door when they can just throw it and take a photo? If you have a choice, choose a different courier service or shop elsewhere where they do.  
    • Boil - it’s the customer’s fault, not the delivery person’s. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...