Jump to content

Recommended Posts

FYI Southwark has now formally decided to sign up to the pan-London e-scooter trial, which enables them to eg specify some no go zones, reduced speed zones, parking hubs etc.


Decision notice here : https://moderngov.southwark.gov.uk/documents/s99526/Report%20-%20London%20eScooters%20trial.pdf


To read more about the background and the identified benefits and risks, worth reading the TfL equalities impact assessment. I found the info about the risks of serious / head injury, compared with cycling, quite alarming. https://content.tfl.gov.uk/rental-escooter-trial-2021.pdf

That would be 4:48 mins to run a mile I think - bit better than jogging! You?re right that you can?t use the US injury figure to suggest there are the same levels of danger associated with this particular trial, of course. Those illegally riding privately owned scooters at higher speeds on the roads are the ones putting themselves at highest risk.

Every time I see someone on an e-scooter I can't help but think that they are inherently unstable - the centre of gravity is all wrong due to the position of the feet and I think people get into trouble when they hit a pot hole etc because of it.


Boris Bikes have always been a problem with people riding them who have no idea what they are doing and I can't help but think that with e-scooters it is going to be even worse.

I am not sure it is even a case of getting used to it - they are inherently unstable due to the standing position and London roads are anything but smooth and I think the combination of the two is very dangerous. The issue with private e-scooters is that you cannot regulate their speed and some of them (we will all have seen them often going faster than cars) go ludicrously fast. Some companies even offer to retrofit e-scooters to make them go faster.


In Germany they have had real problems with e-scooter accidents and a lot of Germans lost their driving licences after being caught being drunk in charge of an e-scooter (which appears to be a big problem in a lot of areas that have rolled them out)! In Germany there has been a lobby calling for e-scooter training to be made compulsory for anyone who wants to rent one and that wearing a helmet when riding one should be a legal requirement.


It's clear they offer a very attractive solution to transportation problems but it's not as if they don't present a huge number of new issues.

It seems that all the trials are plagued by some of the same recurring issues (accidents involving injuries, scooter dumping and littering and bad/irresponsible riding - although it seems only the Germans cite drunk-riding as an issue!)


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-50189279

https://www.france24.com/en/europe/20210630-france-to-crack-down-on-e-scooters-after-two-riders-knock-down-and-kill-woman

northernmonkey Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Don?t you think though that the current crazy

> situation of hiring being ok but not privately

> owned adds to it. If you owned the scooter you

> could get used to it?



Not a crazy situation but a clumsy solution. As they are powered two wheeler they have to be effectively registered to go on the road, including insurance. The hire companies can do this. Similarly fully electric pushbikes, electric skateboards and segways are not road legal.


But the genie is out of the bottle. The authorities are not doing much to discourage road use. Sales are unlikely to be banned. Retailers only I expect need to say that these are for off road use only. And even if they were banned they'd come in from some grey market. And many seem to like them.


Not sure what the longer term plans are for mass acceptance and use.


And on the drunk in charge issue, people have been using pushbikes for decades to get them down the pub, with very few prosecutions.

Chick Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There have been prosecutions for being drunk on an

> escooter resulting a driving ban.


The German police had rich pickings in Munich around Oktoberfest in 2019 - hundreds lost their licences as few realised that being drunk on an e-scooter resulted in a driving ban. Perhaps this is also a great way to help reduce car usage! ;-)

The decision notice says ?Parking - to date, twelve stations to park the eScooters have been identified. These are all off the carriageway and are located in the north of the borough near main transport hubs, but some are located in the south of the borough. Some are in the same locations as agreed and used for the dockless bike stations as there was no concern raised with these locations previously.?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Direct link to joint statement : https://thehaguegroup.org/meetings-bogota-en/?link_id=2&can_id=2d0a0048aad3d4915e3e761ac87ffe47&source=email-pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogota-breakthrough&email_referrer=email_2819587&email_subject=pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogot_-breakthrough&&   No. 26 | The Bogotá Breakthrough “The era of impunity is over.” That was the message from Bogotá, Colombia, where governments from across the Global South and beyond took the most ambitious coordinated action since Israel’s genocidal assault on Gaza began 21 months ago. Convened by The Hague Group and co-chaired by the governments of Colombia and South Africa, the Emergency Conference on Palestine brought together 30 states for two days of intensive deliberation — and emerged with a concrete, coordinated six-point plan to restrain Israel’s war machine and uphold international law. States took up the call from their host, Colombian President and Progressive International Council Member Gustavo Petro, who had urged them to be “protagonists together.” Twelve governments signed onto the measures immediately. The rest now have a deadline: 20 September 2025, on the eve of the United Nations General Assembly. The unprecedented six measures commit states to:     Prevent military and dual use exports to Israel.     Refuse Israeli weapons transfers at their ports.     Prevent vessels carrying weapons to Israel under their national flags.     Review all public contracts to prevent public institutions and funds from supporting Israel’s illegal occupation.     Pursue justice for international crimes.     Support universal jurisdiction to hold perpetrators accountable. “We came to Bogotá to make history — and we did,” said Colombian President Gustavo Petro. “Together, we have begun the work of ending the era of impunity. These measures show that we will no longer allow international law to be treated as optional, or Palestinian life as disposable.” The measures are not symbolic. They are grounded in binding obligations under international law — including the International Court of Justice’s July 2024 advisory opinion declaring Israel’s occupation unlawful, and September 2024’s UN General Assembly Resolution ES-10/24, which gave states a 12-month deadline to act. UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the occupied Palestinian territory Francesca Albanese called them “a momentous step forward.” “The Hague Group was born to advance international law in an era of impunity,” said South Africa’s Foreign Minister, Ronald Lamola. “The measures adopted in Bogotá show that we are serious — and that coordinated state action is possible.” The response from Washington was swift — and revealing. In a threatening statement to journalists, a US State Department spokesperson accused The Hague Group of “seeking to isolate Israel” and warned that the US would “aggressively defend our interests, our military, and our allies, including Israel, from such coordinated legal and diplomatic” actions. But instead of deterring action, the threats have only clarified the stakes. In Bogotá, states did not flinch. They acted — and they invite the world to join them. The deadline for further states to take up the measures is now two months away. And with it, the pressure is mounting for governments across the world — from Brazil to Ireland, Chile to Spain — to match words with action. As Albanese said, “the clock is now ticking for states — from Europe to the Arab world and beyond — to join them.” This is not a moment to observe. It is a moment to act. Share the Joint Statement from Bogotá and popularise the six measures. Write to your elected representative and your government and demand they sign on before 20 September. History was made in Bogotá. Now, it’s up to all of us to ensure it becomes reality, that Palestinian life is not disposable and international law is not optional. The era of impunity is coming to an end. Palestine is not alone. In solidarity, The Progressive International Secretariat  
    • Most countries charge for entry to museums and galleries, often a different rate for locals (tax payers) and foreign nationals. The National Gallery could do this, also places like the Museums in South Kensington, the British Library and other tax-funded institutions. Many cities abroad add a tourist tax to hotel bills. It means tourists help pay for public services.
    • Having just been to Co-op to redeem a 50p off Co-op members' card voucher on an item that is now 50p more than it was last week, Tesco can't come soon enough
    • Surely that depends on the amount.  It can be quite piffling.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...