Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The results of an independent survey show that the residents of East Dulwich Grove are overwhelmingly against making the temporary road closures and traffic restrictions in Dulwich permanent. Not at all surprising given that the LTNs have displaced traffic and therefore increased pollution on the road. Full results here: https://eastdulwichgrove.com/


Also a reminder that the Council?s consultation on the LTNs closes this Sunday 11th July. Here?s the consultation: https://consultations.southwark.gov.uk/environment-leisure/dulwich-review/

Metallic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This is their problem, they don't want their

> voices lost in people speaking on the main site.

> I don't blame them at all. And if you lived on

> EDG you would probably want to be seen as a huge

> victim.


Sure, I get that people are against the closures, and want their voices heard. I don't think it furthers the anti-LTN cause though to keep on opening new threads on the subject.

randonneur Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Please can you define what you mean by

> 'independent survey'.



There's a bit of info in the survey.


Face-to-face surveys with households in on East Dulwich Grove took place during June 2021. An independent external marketing company collected resident feedback for impartiality and confidentiality.

In addition, a card was posted through residents? doors with information on how they could still share their feedback if they were not at home.


Feedback was gathered from the following sources: ➔ Email ➔ Online Questionnaire ➔ Postcard (example to the right) completed in person or dropped off at a local address

randonneur Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Please can you define what you mean by

> 'independent survey'.


From the EDG website https://eastdulwichgrove.com/content/uploads/2021/07/East-Dulwich-Grove__-LTN-Survey-Results-2.pdf page 5:


"Face-to-face surveys with households in on East Dulwich Grove took place during June 2021. An independent external marketing company collected resident feedback for impartiality and confidentiality."

Here?s some further background. An external company, Drew London, were commissioned by the East Dulwich Grove Residents group to independently carry out the survey. Drew London canvassed the 236 households on EDG and gathered responses from 125 of these households. They analysed the data and provided their independent report to the residents group without interference. No residents were involved in the canvassing or creation and publishing of the report.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
    • I perceive the problem.simply as spending too much without first shoring up the economy.  If the government had reduced borrowing,  and as much as most hate the idea, reduced government deiartment spending (so called austerity) and not bowed to union pressures for pay rises, then encouraged businesses to grow, extra cash would have entered the coffers and at a later stage when the economy was in a stronger position rises in NI or taxes would have a lesser impact, but instead Reeves turned that on its head by increasing ni which has killed growth, increased prices and shimmied the economy.  What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???     
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...