Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just read it and whilst I thought it was a knee jerk reaction to the recent events with the toddler I do have to agree they don't seem to be scared of people as much anymore.


Seems like they grudgingly move out of your way at night only because their on their own. I has to be sorted at some point.


Hmmmmn. Let me set up a fur business just incase...

There seems to be a witch hunt going on with foxes at the moment! It is absolutely ludicrous and a ploy to detract attention from more important issues our society is facing.

The recent incident with the four week old baby, as tragic as it was and i wish the poor boy a speedy recovery, had me quite bewildered and a few questions seemed unanswered. Why was a back door left open in the middle of winter, with a 4 week old baby in the first place? It could have just as easily been a paedophile who got in that day.

Also, the mother's account of what happened doesn't quite ring true in my opinion. The mother claims she wrestled with the animal for a couple of minutes. Yet she was uninjured? And surely the fox would not have fought with somebody twice, three times its size, for a "couple of minutes" it's most likely reaction would have been to flee.

Also, the animal apparently had the baby's hand lodged down it's throat; how was the finger recovered? AND how did the fox find it's way out of the home?

Im suprised this fox wasn't blamed for stealing the family car as well...

HOW many fox attacks have there been in the past decade? Literally a few, it is extremley rare; they try to avoid human contact at all costs usually. Yes, they do scavenge for food, but this problem could be prevented if the council collected rubbish more frequently.

Also, foxes should be feeding off rabbits in the countryside, but have been driven into the city by those snobby w*nkers hunting them on horses.

How many times have you seen a fox mauling someone, as a matter of interest? I had a family of foxes living out in my back garden for 20 years, and they were petrified of my Jack russel who was half the size of them.

I say more should be done about the dog fighting going on, stabbings, wannabe gangsters and nonses roaming our streets! Foxes DO NOT pose any threat to our community!

If a fox sees a door open and smells food, i guess it would put two and two together, and try it's luck; it is trying to survive, after all, like the rest of us are.

The moral of this story is take basic security precautions in your home! To protect from burgulars, paedophiles- oh, and of course, foxes.


:-)

I tend to agree with Sophie on this. It is a knee jerk reaction, and the press have not been reporting the correct facts in this case. I did have to laugh at a tv interview with a neighbour who reported seeing 25 foxes standing in the road one night.


Admittedly, I must admit that with regards to the family having the door open in winter, then I'm not sure that doing a fox check would be top of my list of safety concerns.

DjKillaQueen- I reckon you are spot on- those were my thoughts exactly!!! A cover up for a dog attack, and not wanting to have the animal put down.


Another thing, how was the baby dragged from its cot, and didn't sustain any head injuries? Did anyone think about that? :-s

Edit*: Ok, i have just seen the picture of the baby with the scratches/ cuts to the face, so scrap that last comment about the head injuries.

I think it's important to remember that the press are not printing facts about this case, and have been going by statements from relatives (which may be affected by stress, supposition,exaggeration etc), not the parents. And they are being paid considerably for their stories.

I guess if the police are investigating it must be a simple task for science to differentiate between fox and dog.

I wouldn't discount the rogue fox theory. A friends (ED resident) infant was attacked by a fox in Fulham a few years ago.

In broad daylight walking down the footpath when the fox emerged from between cars and bit the childs leg.

The fox then went on to chase a jogger and elderly couple with a dog on a leash.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/8726282.stm


"Foxes are among the most amenable, least aggressive mammals you could share your environment with," he said. "It's very rare for a fox to be brave enough to face a cat."


"I have only ever heard of two cases in my 40 years of dealing with foxes, one of which turned out to be a German Shepherd and the other a cat," he said.

Have to say that far from Sophiescarlett89 being demented her post made perfect sense and was well argued.


I'm not necessarily pro-fox - they (urban foxes) are mangy critters scavaging on our discarded kebabs and chips and they would happily eat a plump young baby given half a chance, in the same way a rural fox will decimate a hen house, no matter what deluded RSPCA officials tell you.


However, the likelihood is small and objectively speaking we'd be better off getting rid of all dogs and cats which are responsible for consuming much needed food for humans and (particularly cats) killing our wildlife in the millions.


The real cull needs to start in your own homes

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In 2016 London City Airport began using concentrated flight paths. When there's a predominantly westerly wind, incoming aircraft approach from East London (north of the River). When there's a predominantly Easterly wind, incoming aircraft approach the airport from the West: circling through Forest Hill, Dulwich, Vauxhall, Tower Hamlets, Docklands. This latter flight path affects many of us in South East London. https://www.london.gov.uk/who-we-are/what-london-assembly-does/questions-mayor/find-an-answer/london-city-airport-concentrated-flight-paths The planes going into City are often below 2,000 ft, so very noisy. Sometimes we have incoming Heathrow at the same time, flying higher. The early flights that I hear e.g. 04:30 are incoming to Heathrow. They are scheduled to land at 05:30 but are 'early'. Apparently the government allows a percentage of flights to arrive early and late (but these are now established as regular occurrences, informally part of the schedule). IMHO Londoners are getting very poor political representation on this issue. Incredible that if you want to complain about aircraft noise, you're supposed to contact the airport concerned! Preposterous and designed solely in favour of aviation expansion.
    • Yet another recommendation for Jafar. Such a nice guy, really reliable and fair. He fixed a problem with our boiler and then incredibly kindly made two more visits to replace a different part at no extra cost. 
    • I didn't have any problems with plane noise until city airport started flying planes to and from about 5-8 minutes apart from 5.30 am or  6 am,  and even with ear plugs and double glazing I am woken at about 6 well before I usually would wake  up. I have lived here since 1986 and it is relatively recently that the planes have been flying far too low over East dulwich. I very much doubt that they are headinbg to Heathrow or from Heathrow. As the crow flies we are much , MUCH closer to City Airport than Heathrow or Gatwick. I even saw one flying so low you could see all the windows, when I was in Peckham Rye Park.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...