Jump to content

Recommended Posts

wordsworth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jules-and-Boo Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > One didn?t have lights, really curious.

> >

> > Did anyone see them?

>

>

> No



The fact you didn't see them means they did their job correctly 🤔🤓

DulwichBorn&Bred Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Pathetic. Grow up.

>

>

> TheCat Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I think we're meant to call them Helicopters of

> > ColouR


I'll admit that humour (even poor humour)/intonation/etc are often lost in email/digial screen....but blimey, you must be an absolute hoot at parties....

TheCat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'll admit that humour (even poor

> humour)/intonation/etc are often lost in

> email/digial screen....but blimey, you must be an

> absolute hoot at parties....


LOL. I assumed "of colour" was in the same bracket as "coloured" - i.e. it's a no-no...


I'm inclined to call this a "stealth chopper". And I'm very curious to hear more!

TheCat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DulwichBorn&Bred Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Pathetic. Grow up.

> >

> >

> > TheCat Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > I think we're meant to call them Helicopters

> of

> > > ColouR

>

> I'll admit that humour (even poor

> humour)/intonation/etc are often lost in

> email/digial screen....but blimey, you must be an

> absolute hoot at parties....



It wouldn't have been funny however you had said it.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well I found the 'joke' amusing. However, I get

> the impression from other posts that I really

> should disapprove of it, but I'm not sure why. If

> that's the case would someone please explain or is

> it simply because my comedy bar is set too low?



Your comedy bar is set fine I reckon.

But others? righteous comments might cause one to question that, bravo you for openly asking!

I?m a hoot for sure but given your past posts and your overtone of racism you aren?t funny and it wasn?t funny. It was childish.



TheCat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DulwichBorn&Bred Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Pathetic. Grow up.

> >

> >

> > TheCat Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > I think we're meant to call them Helicopters

> of

> > > ColouR

>

> I'll admit that humour (even poor

> humour)/intonation/etc are often lost in

> email/digial screen....but blimey, you must be an

> absolute hoot at parties....

I don't normally rush to the cat's defence but a bit of an over-reaction here.


I spend time challenging those who make the silly "oh that is politically correct" comments, which essentially belies their casual homophobia, transphobia, racist, etc etc views. But they live in Bromley where that is the norm. I get an old school friend talking about 'virtual signalling' and having a go at the BBC and many of the adverts for dis-proportionally using ethnic minorities, something that I don't notice or even care about. And again I think middle England casual racism.


But on this occasion I just think it is banter/stirring up debate. No need to be so po faced.


I could do the same in respect to not using terms such as black sheep of the family, the dark side etc etc.


I do cringe at times with Seth MacFarlane, who seems to do his upmost to use stereotypes and the like. His defence of the reference to Down's Syndrome and Sara Palin was that he is an equal opportunity offender. But I look back on some of the terms I would have used, thinking they were quite harmless in previous years, with a bit of a shudder. https://abcnews.go.com/WN/sarah-palin-family-guy-controversy-rages/story?id=9898355


Sorry this thread has mutated. See what you have done Cat?

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't normally rush to the cat's defence but a

> bit of an over-reaction here.

>

> I spend time challenging those who make the silly

> "oh that is politically correct" comments, which

> essentially belies their casual homophobia,

> transphobia, racist, etc etc views. But they live

> in Bromley where that is the norm. I get an old

> school friend talking about 'virtual signalling'

> and having a go at the BBC and many of the adverts

> for dis-proportionally using ethnic minorities,

> something that I don't notice or even care about.

> And again I think middle England casual racism.

>

> But on this occasion I just think it is

> banter/stirring up debate. No need to be so po

> faced.

>

> I could do the same in respect to not using terms

> such as black sheep of the family, the dark side

> etc etc.

>

> I do cringe at times with Seth MacFarlane, who

> seems to do his upmost to use stereotypes and the

> like. His defence of the reference to Down's

> Syndrome and Sara Palin was that he is an equal

> opportunity offender. But I look back on some of

> the terms I would have used, thinking they were

> quite harmless in previous years, with a bit of a

> shudder.

> https://abcnews.go.com/WN/sarah-palin-family-guy-c

> ontroversy-rages/story?id=9898355

>

> Sorry this thread has mutated. See what you have

> done Cat?


Shoosh

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • - had all the wrong connections at the wrong time - fraternised with some well dodgy blokes or rather one at least   - smart and  smooth talker - he has all the smoothness and ability to flatter - he is highly polished - skilled at making personal connections - never liked or trusted the chap, reminiscent of a slime ball
    • A friend has asked me to recommend Juliene for regular cleaning as she has some slots available. Her phone number is 07751426567
    • I'd put short odds on that but who would be his likely successor?
    • Hi, I went to the council's planning portal to look at the application, and I encourage others to look at it. It looks like a pleasant building, with thoughtful landscaping. as Pugwash said, the big oak would be retained, only two smaller trees are supposed to be cut, one of which is already dead according to the Tree Survey. It sounds like 38 people in great need of it will gain supported housing thanks to this development, a very positive change. Of course a solution has to be found for the 3 who will need to find other accommodation during the works, but that doesn't seem enough of a reason to oppose the development. The current building is 4 stories, so I would be surprised if one extra storey was considered objectionable, especially considering the big oak stands between the building and the neighbours' back gardens and the fact that the neighbours it's backing onto are all 5 stories houses themselves or only have blank walls facing the building. In the context where affordable housing is sorely missing, a 100% supported housing development is great news. Personally I've never seen a less objectionable planning request
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...