Jump to content

Can anyone help an an apprentice find 16 hours of work


Ty189

Recommended Posts

Hi Everyone/Anyone


Basically,

I am 20 and have recently been in contact with the apprenticeship trainning provider JTL and unfortunately they will not fund me to train with out being employed for at least 16 hours a week for a minimum of ?2.56 p/h.


I have tried contacting employers but have not had much luck, so if you would be interested or know someone who may be interested in taking on an electrical apprentice to help grow local business could you please e-mail me or give me a call for more information.


also JTL has said that the employer does not have to be a qualified electrician because they provide all the trainning, meaning the employer can be in the construction, maintainence or repair industry as long as there is some sort of electrical work because it is a nvq qualification ( assesment of work carried out, building a portfolio)


Thanks for your time


Ty



East Dulwich Se22

: [email protected]

: 07534 560 209

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Ty,


Try going to the local electrical wholesallers, (inc Edwards in Penge) and see if you can put up a card on their info boards, you may get lucky.


JTL should have a list of employers who take on apprentices as well, usually a training co-ordinator would be out recruiting new employers for JTL and reviewing apprentices on site.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I believe around 57% of the 5,538 people who were part of the self selecting sample making up the original consultation, opposed the LTN. So just over 3,000 people. This was around 3 years ago now. I think there’s something like 40,000+ living across se22 and SE21 🤷‍♂️  The LTN is a minority interest at best. Whilst it’s an obsession for a small number on the transport thread who strongly oppose it, I suspect most locals quietly approve of the improvements made to that junction. …and we still haven’t heard who has supposedly been pressurising the emergency services and how (are we seriously going with the far left / the commies)? Is anyone willing to stand up and support the 'One' claim that people are partially covering their plates and driving through the filters due to inadequate signage? Again, it all sounds a little ridiculous / desperate. Feels like it may be time for them to start coming to terms with the changes.
    • Okay Earl, of those 'consulted' how many voices were in favour of the junction and how many against? Were there more responses in favour or more against? This local junction change is being driven by Southwark Labour Councillors- not as you assert by Central Govt. Also, if consultations are so irrelevant as indicators of meaningful local support in the way you seem to imply, why do organisations like Southwark Cyclists constantly ask their members to respond to all and any consultation on LTN's and CPZ's?  
    • You could apply the same argument to any kind of penalty as an effective deterrent.  Better than doing nothing. 
    • Check the link I provided above. It gives a very full account of where the push for LTNs came from, (in brief, central government). The consultation did not show that the majority of local residents were against the LTN. Not for the first time, you’ve confused a ‘consultation’ with a ‘referendum’. The outcome of local elections (which many opposed to LTNs excitedly promoted as a referendum on the scheme at the time…until they lost), suggests they are actually quite popular. All the polling on LTNs generally, also shows strong majority support across London.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...