Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have had these letters for the past two years, so its nothing new.


If you look at recent stats in ED, we were doing OK for burglary in 2012 (i.e. down on 2011 in most months) until December - where there was a noticable spike.


Our neighbours got robbed late last year, however they had limited front door locks and access was made easy through the letterbox. The key is to take as many precautions as possible (alarms, locks, lights etc), and a dog sign cant hurt either.


I am disappointed to hear resources have been moved just because Southwark as a borough has improved in terms of crime. James, can you have a word to Boris? He is more than welcome to come and meet the locals, now that he knows where East Dulwich is:


http://www.thisiscroydontoday.co.uk/Enthusiasm-delayed-late-arrival-Boris-Johnson/story-13952894-detail/story.html#axzz2KxDgtmnk

Once people realise that the area is getting richer then it will become a magnet for thieves- burglaries increase. The householders will then (usually) install better security- burglaries decrease. Also, after a home is burgled it is frequently burgled again fairly soon afterwards if nothing is done i.e. after the tv etc has been replaced and then the householder cannot get insurance unless the home is kitted out properly.

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> But for East Dulwich crime is markedly up and this

> is probably due to our Safer Neighbourhood Team

> being abstracted (told to work elsewhere) from our

> area.


xxxxxxx


I have been in correspondence with you before about the total lack of response when our road (Ulverscroft Road) was asked to take part in a Neighbourhood Watch scheme via flyers put through our door. It must have been well over a year ago now, possibly two years!


I replied saying I would like to be involved, and despite chasing them several times, including via you (thanks) never heard any more about it.


Not helpful, is it. Who runs Neighbourhood Watch schemes? I believe it is the police. So why did they just let it drop?


ETA: And Penguin 68, you're absolutely right about the insurance issue. That was the point I was trying to make earlier about using stats from insurance companies as a basis for comparing areas' burglary rates, but you've made it much better than me.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • There is a new Londis on Melbourne Grove that is open! Decent prices too
    • Another recommendation for Electrical Initiative. Leon is professional friendly efficient and an extremely reliable electrician. He sorted out my garden outside light last year and I didn't hesitate to use him to replace my noisy bathroom extractor fan which kept the bathroom cold in the winter. Leon recommended a lovely new fan which has shutters and is silent. My bathroom is warmer and I am very happy with my new extractor fan.
    • It means nothing of the sort Penguin. It simply means that wherever that TSG van was when they got a call to somewhere else, that road was the most efficient and quickest way to get from where they were to where they needed to be. Said as someone who drives frequently on blue lights in this area and has had absolutely no issues caused by any changes in road layouts. I have elsewhere, but not in this patch. 
    • You would think by now people would be more media savvy but no “it’s lead story on bbc!” Like that means anything in 2025 in what sane world would a teams be entitled to 36k for a petty oversight like this.  Absolute binfire of a reaction 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...