Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Details here

https://www.southwark.gov.uk/assets/attach/49176/whateley-road-new-zebra-crossing-notice-dated-15-july-2021-.pdf


It looks like the notice for this was posted 15th July. As far as I am aware there was no consultation (I guess there doesn't have to be?) about the plans.


I have absolutely no objection to a zebra on Whateley (I know lots of people have asked for one over the years) but the whole scheme is completely over the top. The pavement widening is madness - just wholly impractical. On the west side (the bit nearer LL) they have built it to the camber of the road. But there's no draining or new gully where it meets the pavement. Where is rain water supposed to go?


It's really badly designed.


Couldn't they have just put the zebra in, and left it at that?


Or is it just me? Am I missing some benefits of the rest of it?

Another bizarre decision by LB Southwark to slow down and bottle neck traffic.

Does Whateley Road really need a zebra crossing?

But why widen the pavement to the extent it stops buses passing each other, utter madness, the lunatics really are running the asylum at LBS.

I believe that, when it's finished, it will make it much easier for two buses to pass each other. This is because the scheme removes some car parking space. I queried the plans around the time of the consultation because I was concerned that they hadn't considered the P13 buses, but they helpfully sent me drawings and measurements to show that two buses will be able to pass each other at the built-out curbs. The new curbs will not take up as much road space as the parked cars which they displace. It was demonstrated to me that it will actually improve the road for the P13s by providing this much needed passing place .

According to the data on crashmap, there have been 2 incidents on that stretch of road in the last ten years. One involving 1 vehicle and 1 casualty and 1 involving 2 vehicles and 1 casualty. In both cases the severity of the incident is recorded as 'slight'.


As such, I do not think there was a strong 'safety' rationale for this project.

kiera Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I believe that, when it's finished, it will make

> it much easier for two buses to pass each other.

> This is because the scheme removes some car

> parking space. I queried the plans around the time

> of the consultation because I was concerned that

> they hadn't considered the P13 buses, but they

> helpfully sent me drawings and measurements to

> show that two buses will be able to pass each

> other at the built-out curbs. The new curbs will

> not take up as much road space as the parked cars

> which they displace. It was demonstrated to me

> that it will actually improve the road for the

> P13s by providing this much needed passing place .


As the drawing I've linked to shows, the build out is wider than the space a parked car would take up (unless you've got Jeremy Clarkson's Lamborghini tractor, of course). I don't know what Jedi mind trick they were trying to pull when they sent you measurements, but as far as I know a narrower road space will make it harder for two buses to pass each other. Unless perhaps the buses are also being narrowed.


However, as you are more likely to see a tiger on Whateley Road than a P13, let alone two at the same time, buses passing each other probably isn't really an issue.


The lake that will be created whenever there's a heavyish bit of rain, and the fact that you can't see what you're doing when trying to navigate turning from Fellbrigg into Whateley or from Whateley into Fellbrigg, will however I fear be an issue.

The road modifications will result in buses pulling over as they do to let each other and other traffic pass by. I use the P13 every week through Whateley Road, all this will succeed in is to create a bottle neck. Personally I can't see the need for a zebra crossing being located there but residents may well have other opinions about this and good reason for wanting one. Perhaps because of the primary school located on the corner of Whately and LL it was thought necessary????

Buses pass frequently on Whateley - just to clear that up.

If someone hasn?t seen that happen, then they just haven?t seen that happen.

I have, often. So it does happen.


And yes, the pseudo-science someone was sent regarding ?increased? space for buses passing because of wider pavements doesn?t make sense.

Those built-out bits are definitely wider than an average car. And in fact there'll be less room for buses to pass because they used to be able to pull over at the entrances to Fellbrigg/Cyrena Road (as there were double yellow lines around the junction) but now the roads are built out there's actually less room to pull in than before unless they mount the kerb. Gonna be fun.


I'm actually in favour of having a crossing there as there are two primary schools nearby and that road is always tricky to cross in the mornings. But the council is gaslighting us if they say they've considered the buses in their plans.

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Buses pass frequently on Whateley - just to clear

> that up.

> If someone hasn?t seen that happen, then they just

> haven?t seen that happen.

> I have, often. So it does happen.

>

> And yes, the pseudo-science someone was sent

> regarding ?increased? space for buses passing

> because of wider pavements doesn?t make sense.



Sorry if I didn't explain very well.

I queried the plans because I was concerned that the road space around the junction was being narrowed without the provision of a space for buses to pull in to allow other vehicles to pass. However, the figures I was given by Southwark's transport engineer showed that buses should be able to pass each other at this point without the need to pull in. He explained that, although the road is approx. 9m. wide, only 5.4m was available for traffic, due to parked cars on both sides of the road. He said Government guidelines advise that buses need a minimum width of 3m in each lane. In redesigning the junction for the zebra crossing this was taken into consideration, so that each lane will be 3.2m wide. So I'm expecting the new increased available road width of 6.5m to make life easier for the bus drivers.

bonaome Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> As the drawing I've linked to shows, the build out

> is wider than the space a parked car would take up... I don't know what Jedi mind

> trick they were trying to pull when they sent you

> measurements, but as far as I know a narrower road

> space will make it harder for two buses to pass

> each other.

As the drawing you have linked to shows, the road is 6.5m wide at the buildout on Whately Rd and 6m wide on Fellbrig and Cyrena. The buildout is wider than a car but there is still sufficient width because parking on the side of the street opposite the buildout will be prohibited - as the drawing you have linked to also shows.


Your sarcasm and stories of tigers and Jeremy Clarkson are totally misplaced.

#SouthwarkDerangementSyndrome

I think a crossing there is a good idea because there are two schools very nearby and the road, although it has two names, links Lordship, Barry and (kind of) Forest Hill Roads so is pretty busy. Perhaps when the buses are replaced the operator will choose a slightly smaller, more compact one? The P13 is really valuable but it's noisy and seems to be very mostly 1/3 or 1/3 full.

the P13 used to be a shopper hopper type bus that was then moved to the current model.

during term time the bus is used by ALOT of school children travelling to dulwich college, kingsdale and elm green - in fact they were often completely full. I remember a thread many years ago about asking TFL to increase the frequency during school times to accommodate the childrens' travel.

Dogkennelhillbilly Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> there is still sufficient width

> because parking on the side of the street opposite

> the buildout will be prohibited - as the drawing

> you have linked to also shows.

>

> Your sarcasm and stories of tigers and Jeremy

> Clarkson are totally misplaced.

> #SouthwarkDerangementSyndrome


There were previously double yellow lines there on both sides (not shown in the drawing to which I have linked). The road _is_ narrower at that pinch point with less space for two vehicles to pass each other (be they buses or other traffic) than at that junction than previously.


I don't think buses passing each other on Whateley Road, was, is, or will be a problem, regardless of the actual service frequency of the P13.


I support the zebra. I think it'll make some parents feel reassured enough to allow some younger kids to walk all the way to school by themselves.


I think the pavement build out at the junction east of the zebra is a ridiculous waste of money, and very poorly designed.

I?m glad something is being done at that junction, as it?s on an key route for kids to two schools and is not a friendly place to cross.

Whateley Road though will only ever be safe to cross, if 100% of drivers respect the 20mph speed limit. Sadly many drivers don?t. If they did, I guess all these works would not have been required in the first place.

Whether building out kerbs and losing a load of parking spaces will make drivers slow down, only time will tell.

Having looked at what has been built, I very much doubt it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • You may have seen an article in the paper today about Jewish leaders and notables calling on the UN and world leaders to sanction Israel [https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/oct/22/jewish-notables-open-letter-un-sanction-israel], "... Prominent Jewish figures around the world are calling on the United Nations and world leaders to impose sanctions on Israel over what they describe as “unconscionable” actions amounting to genocide in Gaza. Over 450 signatories, including former Israeli officials, Oscar winners, authors and intellectuals have signed an open letter demanding accountability over Israel’s conduct in Gaza, the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem. The letter’s release comes as EU leaders meet in Brussels on Thursday amid reports they plan to shelve proposals for sanctions over human rights violations. “We have not forgotten that so many of the laws, charters, and conventions established to safeguard and protect all human life were created in response to the Holocaust,” the signatories write. “Those safeguards have been relentlessly violated by Israel.” ..."   There is also a petition we can sign to support them in their call for justice: Direct link: https://secure.avaaz.org/campaign/en/stand_with_jews_demand_action_loc_cp1/?tUwBCsb&v=502713833&cl=22394973010&_checksum=7dc99acb5dd4fc5a43a24e21772f51005ea239753e9ae3033d9f79ffd6119559 "For the first time since the ceasefire, a powerful coalition of Jewish voices have come together, urging world leaders to keep the pressure up until real accountability and freedom are achieved.Their call can shift the political mood and give leaders courage to act decisively -- Amplify their voices and stand with them: The demands of Global Jewish Voices: To respect and abide by the decisions of the International Court of Justice, noting their application also in the West Bank and East Jerusalem; to apply arrest warrants issued by the International Criminal Court; and to resist efforts to unduly pressure and influence and prevent the workings of both courts. To refuse any complicity in continued crimes and violations of international law against Palestinians by Israel, including by ending the provision of arms and other relevant goods and services; to use relevant leverage, including targeted sanctions on governmental bodies and individuals responsible for violations of international law, and suspension of relations with commercial entities contributing to these violations. To ensure that humanitarian assistance reaches all Palestinians in Gaza at the scale that is commensurate to their vital need, that the blockade is lifted and materials for reconstruction enter, and that there is a full Israeli military withdrawal. To refute false accusations of antisemitism that abusively deploy our collective history to tarnish those with whom we stand together in the pursuit of peace and justice. If you are of Jewish heritage you can also sign here, and we will add the number of your voices to support the Jewish call for justice. Posted: 22 October 2025"  
    • I've actually met Luke Johnson and he's actually a very amicable, witty and extremely clever man. He's also created thousands of jobs and generated millions and millions of pounds of tax revenue for the government, offering goods and hospitality that countless millions of people have enjoyed over the decades. I'm not a fan of Gail's but I'm also not a fan of people who knock down good guys that have contributed a huge amount to this country.  Anyway, French Patisseries and southern hemisphere coffee don't belong on Farmer's markets. 
    • What mandatory action would then be required of them?
    • Probably will be mandatory once Digital ID comes in.    They can then use the cameras on the tills too to bring all sorts of other useful ancillary controls, such as limiting how much alcohol you buy each week, or monitoring and limiting the carbon footprint of the food you buy (some foods now are already showing the CO2 emissions consumed in producing them).
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...