Jump to content

Goodbye Marvel, hello Cat - a feminist comic book...


Recommended Posts

New launch, and who woulda thunk it.


No heaving cleavage or razor stilettos, damsels in distress or whimsical female sidekicks.


It's here: http://www.mysocalledsecretidentity.com/comic/volume1/issue1/cover


I've not read a comic since Roy of the Rovers, and I'm sure Marvel have higher production values, but I enjoyed it :)


Is this a new medium?

There have always been 'feminist' comics. There has been an independent comic sector outside of the superhero big boys for decades. I was one of a whole bunch of female comic artists in the early 90's. Look up artists like Kate Charlesworth for example and even stuff published by the guys like 'Love and Rockets' by the Hernandez Brothers. The only thing new is that one of the big boys has finally realised there's a market outside of the nerdy geek male niche....something that the big French comic publishers have known all along for example.

Pretty good. I don't see it as a 'feminist' comic (and all the baggage that would entail), but just a comic for girls showing a positive, interesting, identifiable character.


(Though they need to cut down the resolution to pick up the awfully slow loading speed!)

I didn't know about feminist French Comic Books DJKQ, have you got some examples?


Loz, it was the authors that described it as feminist in interviews, to quote: "a feminist approach from the ground up, in terms of story, character, artwork and production". http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2013/feb/18/comic-book-superheroine-cat-gender


It certainly doesn't adhere to the common negative stereotypes about feminists, and I must say I think the heroine is quite hot when she's in her clubbing gear.


Don't know why she has to go around in tweed the rest of the time ;-)

Don't even have to go to France H. Look up Carol Bennett and her company knockabout comics here in the UK. Been independently publishing comics for decades including work by female artists that challenges the stereotypes of the more mainstream industry.

KalamityKel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> darn that was a misleading thread title! there was

> me thinking "what? a funny feminist? surely not!

> aint that malarky all meant to b serious and

> stuff?"



Actually most serious feminists are hysterically* funny. They just don't mean to be. Or see the joke.


(* 'offensive' use of the word entirely intended)

I should think globally that the number of people who believe women have equality of rights is in a minority.


There's no doubt that comic magazine culture doesn't espouse equality in general (Bat'man' but only Bat'girl' - infantilisation is a blatant reduction of rights).

legalbeagle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Definition of feminism, according to Oxford

> Dictionaries:

>

> "the advocacy of women?s rights on the ground of

> the equality of the sexes."

>

> On this basis, is anyone NOT a feminist?


On that basis, it does look alluring. But, according to you moniker, you trade in the legal area. Surely you can see the massive legal loophole there? The main problem with feminism - and your definition - is that although it mentions the word 'equality', it is rather uninterested in the meaning of the word in a wider sense. (Admittedly, many feminists are committed to complete equality, but it is by no means part of the ideology.)


Let's give a rather silly example, but one that paints the picture. Let's say Johnny has 10 red sweets and 2 blue. Jenny has 10 blue sweets and 2 red. By your definition of feminism, Jenny is suffering a serious lack of rights in the red sweet area. This must be rectified. Johnny must give Jenny four red sweets to maintain equality. But that is all the equalising we'll be doing here - the blue sweet issue remains how it is. Was that really equality?


And anyway, Feminism is such a broad church of equalitists, misandrists, female separatists, rad-fems and every other variation you can think of, as an ideology it is, effectively, meaningless. Thus the 'baggage' comment. Issues like transsexuals can really throw a spotlight on some of the nastier, bigoted sides of feminism (c.f. the recent Julie Burchill rant.) And most women can see this - few want to identify directly with feminism because, frankly, it's public face is pretty damn poor. And, I'm afraid, rather deservedly poor.


It's like saying that socialism is a good idea - and who can argue against it's basic tenets? - yet ignoring the history of the awful ways it has been put into practice.


So do I think feminism (as practised) is a good thing? Obviously, no. Do I believe in equality across genders and races and sexualities and many other unnecessary discriminations society makes? Of course I do. It's the basis of all my politics.


Thus, to answer you question, no. Everyone should not be a feminist. Everyone should believe in equality for all. Because the issues around equality are so complex, simple one-sided gender approaches just don't cut it any more.


That is not to say that feminism hasn't made some great inroads into equality in the past. Just that maybe, just maybe, it needs to be retired to history and replaced with a better ideology that believes in equality more, well, equally.


Hmmm. Maybe this is a thread of its own!

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Is this where Loz hangs out?

> http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/to-the-nice-feminists/


Ah, yes. Anyone who points out the deficiencies in Feminism is a wild-eyed MRA. Isn't that the same line of thinking of the old 'must be a lesbian' canard?


C'mon Rosie - you're normally a better debater than that.

He probably needs locking in a cell with a Robin Morgan... "I feel that "man-hating" is an honorable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them."


Or this one is a particular favourite: "I claim that rape exists any time sexual intercourse occurs when it has not been initiated by the woman, out of her own genuine affection and desire."


On that basis I have lost count of the number of times I've been raped.


Every movement has its lunatics. If Robin Morgan doesn't invalidate feminism then this blogger doesn't invalidate Loz.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What was he doing on the stage at Glastonbury? Or on the stage at the other concert in Finsbury Park? Grinning like a Cheshire cat whilst pissed and stoned 20 somethings on the promise of free internet sung-- Oh Jeremy Corbyn---  What were his policies for Northern mining towns with no jobs or infrastructure? Free Internet and university places for youngsters. What were his other manifesto pledges? Why all the ambiguity over Brexit?  I didn't like Thatcher, Blair or May or Tony but I respected them as politicians because they stood by what they believed in. I respect all politicians across the board that stick to their principles. Corbyn didn't and its why he got  annihilated at the polls. A socialist, anti imperialist and anti capitalist that said he voted for an imperialist and pro capitalist cabal. He refused to say how he'd vote over and over again until the last knockings. He did so to appease the Islington elite and middle class students he was courting. The same people that were screaming that Brexit was racist. At the same time the EU were holding black and Asian immigrants in refugee camps overseas but not a word on that! Corbyn created and courted a student union protest movement that screamed at and shouted down anyone not on the left . They claimed Starmer and the centre right of labour were tories. He didn't get elected  because he, his movement and policies were unelectable, twice. He turned out not to have the convictions of his politics and died on his own sword.    Reform won't win an election. All the idiots that voted for them to keep out Labour actually enabled Labour. They'll be back voting tory next time.    Farage wouldn't be able to make his millions if he was in power. He's a very devious shyster but I very much doubt he'd actually want the responsibility that governance requires.
    • The purge of hard left members that were part of Corbyn's, Mcdonnel's and Lansmans momentum that purged the party of right wing and centrist members. That's politics. It's what Blair did to win, its what Starmer had to do to win. This country doesn't vote in extreme left or right governments. That's partly why Corbyn lost  We're pretty much a centrist bunch.  It doesn't make it false either. It's an opinion based on the voting patterns, demography and statistics. Can you explain then why former mining constituencies that despise the tories voted for them or abstained rather than vote for Corbyns Labour?  What is the truth then? But he never got elected!!! Why? He should have been binned off there and then. Why he was allowed to hang about is an outrage. I hold him party responsible for the shit show that we've had to endure since. 
    • Depends on what the Barista says doesnt it? There was no physical confrontation with the driver, OP thinks she is being targetted when she isnt. These guys work min wage under strict schedules so give them a break unless they damage your stuff
    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...