Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I do both, so here's my take...


1) Skiing is better on piste, snowboarding much better/easier off-piste.


2) Skiing is easier to pick up, but harder to master. Snowboarding is difficult for the first couple of days, but you pick it up quickly from there and can pretty much go anywhere after a couple of weeks.


3) Skiing is faster. Snowboarding is cooler.


4) Both are great fun. Do whichever one appeals to you more.

I'd also agree with Loz, more or less. I ski, and have done a little bit of snowboarding.


The first week of snowboarding is tough. You have to be resilient to falling over repeatedly, very hard, on your arse. It helps a lot if you're physically fit and flexible, because you'll have to do a lot of scooting along, getting up off the ground, and bending down to fasten/unfasten your bindings. Skiing is much easier to pick up, and by the end of the first week you should be confident building up a bit of speed, whizzing past the snowboard class.


I prefer skiing, but if you're willing to persevere and have an interest in off-piste or freestyle, snowboarding could be the one to go for.

Chillaxed Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Agree with Loz. For me being able to walk half

> normally in snowboard boots swings it.

>

> And to clarify, if you've only ever 'boarded it's

> totes OK to board even if you're a 40+ Dad...right?


Well, I am 46. But not a dad. And I am never the oldest boarder on the mountain.


The Snowboard Club UK recently had a thread asking about snowboarders over 40. The response was pretty impressive...


http://www.snowboardclub.co.uk/index.php?name=PNphpBB2&file=viewtopic&t=53457&start=0&postdays=0&postorder=asc&highlight=

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A positive update from Southwark Council - “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.“  
    • A solicitor is acting as the executor for our late Aunt's will.  He only communicates by letter which is greatly lengthening the process.  The vast majority of legal people deal by modern means - the Electronic Communications Act that allows for much, if not all of these means is now 25 years old.   Any views and advice out there? In fuller detail: The value of the estate is not high.  There are a number of beneficiaries including one in the US.  It has taken almost three years and there is no end in sight.  The estate (house) is now damp, mouldy and wall paper falling off the wall. The solicitor is hostile, has threatened beneficiaries the police (which would just waste the police's time), and will not engage constructively. He only communicates by letter.  These are poorly written, curt or even hostile, in a language from the middle of last century, he clearly is typing these himself probably on a type writer.  Of course with every letter he makes more money. We've taken the first steps to complain either through the ombudsman and/or the SRA.  We have taken legal advice a couple of times, which of course isn't cheap, and were told that his behaviour is shocking and we'd be in our right to have him removed through the courts. But.... we just want him to get on with executing the will, primarily selling the house. However he refuses to use any other form of communication but letter.  So writing to the beneficiary in the 'States can take a month to get a reply. And even in this country a week or more. Having worked with lawyers in the past I am aware that email, tele and video conferencing and even text and WhatApp are appropriate means for communication.  There could be an immediate response to his questions.   Help!        
    • Labour should be applauded for bringing in the Renter's Rights Act.  But so many of you are carried away with slagging them off. Married couples with busy lives sometimes forget who did what. On this occasion Mr Rachel Reeves was sorting out the rental agreement.  Ms Reeves was a bit flumoxed with all the grief/demonsing/witch hunts she is getting so forgot to check with her other half.   Not the first or last time this will happen with couples. (That's not having a go at the post above)
    • Hello! I'm looking for a talented, affordable people photographer to do headshots for my start up's website, for 4 people. If you're keen I'd love to see examples of your work please. Many thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...