Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I do both, so here's my take...


1) Skiing is better on piste, snowboarding much better/easier off-piste.


2) Skiing is easier to pick up, but harder to master. Snowboarding is difficult for the first couple of days, but you pick it up quickly from there and can pretty much go anywhere after a couple of weeks.


3) Skiing is faster. Snowboarding is cooler.


4) Both are great fun. Do whichever one appeals to you more.

I'd also agree with Loz, more or less. I ski, and have done a little bit of snowboarding.


The first week of snowboarding is tough. You have to be resilient to falling over repeatedly, very hard, on your arse. It helps a lot if you're physically fit and flexible, because you'll have to do a lot of scooting along, getting up off the ground, and bending down to fasten/unfasten your bindings. Skiing is much easier to pick up, and by the end of the first week you should be confident building up a bit of speed, whizzing past the snowboard class.


I prefer skiing, but if you're willing to persevere and have an interest in off-piste or freestyle, snowboarding could be the one to go for.

Chillaxed Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Agree with Loz. For me being able to walk half

> normally in snowboard boots swings it.

>

> And to clarify, if you've only ever 'boarded it's

> totes OK to board even if you're a 40+ Dad...right?


Well, I am 46. But not a dad. And I am never the oldest boarder on the mountain.


The Snowboard Club UK recently had a thread asking about snowboarders over 40. The response was pretty impressive...


http://www.snowboardclub.co.uk/index.php?name=PNphpBB2&file=viewtopic&t=53457&start=0&postdays=0&postorder=asc&highlight=

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • If it was limited to a couple of days a year, so we all knew, that would be fine. In the last few years (and it is a recent thing) you get random fireworks going off any time after dusk for half the year. It does more than cause problems for pets and wildlife- it can mean lasting damage and massive expense and hassle for pet owners. All because some get a buzz out of loud bangs.
    • Ohh dear.  Fireworks can be great fun.  Where I used to live the kids would have firework wars/games.  Watching them was more enjoyable than watching  TV. (Which you could hardly hear due to the pops and bangs).  It's not like anyone/anything could stop them. I would still prefer organised public displays that are affordable.   And I agree that fireworks cause problems for wild life, pets and people.   It seems to be one of those things that just happens so we have to put up with it.  But it is still not as problematic here as in other areas in London - that's for sure.
    • I made sure to set off a few today just to rile you guys up 😇😂 Always looking for something to criticise 
    • Ugly...maybe..does it bother me..NO! I think its somehow reassuring to see theres still phoneboxes around. East Dulwich may  be getrified but there may well be some elderly people who don't have mobiles and kids who may have lost theirs adults ditto etc etc. I'd rather keep it than lose it...just because i don't use it does'nt mean its not needed.  there are many eyesores in the modern world not all of them as potentially useful.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...