Jump to content

Car Garage Recommendation please


beansprout

Recommended Posts

I would recommend Reg and Paul Shires at Dulwich Test, now in the Tyrrell Road industrial site. They have looked after my family's cars for the last 30 years and counting. Very fair and honest. And expert. https://good-garage-guide.honestjohn.co.uk/garages/d/dulwich-test-service-centre/

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ED_moots Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I've used dell autos for mot and minor stuff.

> > They've always been fine. Not too expensive,

> > straightforward and always call before doing

> extra

> > work.

>

>

> Not always, IME !!


Not in mine either! That said, I do think they know what they're talking about.

This is calling for recommendations of where to go, not who to avoid,


Statements such as " Avoid Turners. Rip off merchants!!" could be viewed as defamation. And for balance they score pretty well on Google reviews: https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=Turners+garage+dulwich#lrd=0x487603bc2f92f879:0xc4bb1c94501de287,1,,,


Me - went to Pitstop in Upland Road and was happy http://www.pitstoprepairs.com/ Google reviews decent


For decades I went to Oly Autos in Loughborough Junction and have no problems with continuing except that Pitstop in more local. https://olyautos.co.uk/ Got to know Oly and his son pretty well, and went next door to Gordon Grove Garage for my MOT's, sadly the gent Peter who did these for decades passed a couple of years ago,

Exactly what Penguin68 said. Including 30 years of looking after my family cars and always fair, honest expert. Also the cleanest and tidiest garage ever.


Penguin68 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I would recommend Reg and Paul Shires at Dulwich

> Test, now in the Tyrrell Road industrial site.

> They have looked after my family's cars for the

> last 30 years and counting. Very fair and honest.

> And expert.

> https://good-garage-guide.honestjohn.co.uk/garages

> /d/dulwich-test-service-centre/

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Hello, I am looking for some lego minifigures for my son's birthday. If you are getting rid of any, please let me know. Thank you! Jo 07950 083 258
    • you're missing the point and come across as just being disagreeable.   I'm therefore just going to close this - as it;'s not a debate or an argument   DRIVERS  - please pay extra care as there are cyclists who are very low visibility and without lights or suitable clothing CYCLISTS - Put lights on your bike - front and back - and reflective strips at the very least. Consider other road users and pedestrians.  EVERYONE - Be safe    
    • There is no law about what people must wear when cycling. The highway code also suggests that pedestrians might want to wear bright clothes in order to make themselves more visible, but I don't think many people actually follow that advice. I think people should wear what ever they feel comfortable in. You shouldn't have to wear 'special clothes' in order to use a bicycle, or to take a walk. Seeing as you pose a far higher risk to others when you're travelling by car, there is arguably a far greater moral duty on you to consider how colourful your car is, than how brightly you dress as a pedestrian or cyclist. There are laws about lights. I agree that people should have lights on at night.  There are invisible cyclists? 🤣 You have no sympathy for someone travelling perfectly legally by bicycle, with good lights and reflectors, and who is hit by a driver paying insufficient attention, if they're not wearing bright clothing? And does the same view extend to pedestrians? From the highway code:
    • Cyclists who chose not to follow advice, guidance or rules specific to visability in poor light conditions choose the risks they run and I see no reason for sympathy when their luck runs out. However, I do feel sympathy both for pedestrians hit by invisible cyclists, and obviously those with visual or hearing impairment which adds to their risk on the pavements or road, and to drivers who may hit these invisible cyclists and suffer guilt or trauma having done so. And anyone who wishes to suggest that a cyclist so hit is not to blame because it's always the drivers fault can go hang.  Why do you think the rules and guidance exist in the first place? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...