Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Also the neighbourhood watch police area I live (DV ward) in sent a newsletter before Christmas that there is a scam locally with DPD delivering an unexpected parcel, correctly addressed and then another DPD driver coming later on and saying it was delivered by mistake, and trying to get it back. Mystery how they do it and no one has been caught yet. The newsletter said to phone police if this is the case and then hopefully they will catch the person doing it. I suppose they are masquerading as DPD couriers.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> How would they know the parcel was "unexpected"?

>

> That seems a bit strange!

Because it has a return address on it not recognised. Or is opened and then you don't know what it is and where it has come from, and then there is the knock at the door. High value things, we were told expensive items.

Metallic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > How would they know the parcel was

> "unexpected"?

> >

> > That seems a bit strange!

> Because it has a return address on it not

> recognised. Or is opened and then you don't know

> what it is and where it has come from, and then

> there is the knock at the door. High value

> things, we were told expensive items.



But that doesn't make sense?


What is the scam, exactly? Someone is changing the addresses on the parcels, so that it is delivered to someone else, hence the recipient isn't expecting it?


Because for it to be a scam, the second person coming to the door would need to know that the person it was delivered to isn't the intended recipient.


And how would they know that, if it was delivered to the original address on the package?


Is someone repackaging parcels so that the new address hasn't obviously been tampered with?


Have I missed something here? (quite likely 🙄)

It's not a new scam - I had this a few years back when someone opened a load of fake online shopping accounts in my name - but I'm sure is more prevalent now. It works like this:


Scammer orders expensive goods in name of ED resident using credit or cloned card details. DHL or similar deliver parcel with expensive goods in. As soon as possible after real delivery, fake DHL driver knocks on door and says "oops, did you get a wrong delivery - our fault - I've come to take the parcel back". If the resident hands back the parcel, then the scammer gets to go off with the goods.


In my case, I knew I hadn't ordered a tonne of men's clothes from Very and was on the phone with them when the scammer rang my door, but even though I had a strong suspicion it was a scam, he was totally convincing - even tried to take the phone off me to speak to Very to explain it was a delivery mistake. I can understand why people would hand back the parcel, even if they opened it and didn't think they had ordered it.

Brideshead Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> How can personal data be posted online just

> because a copper wrote it in a notebook?

>

> Would breach all sorts of privacy law

>

> Don?t think so mate

>

> Don?t talk silly please


I mean into police and security service records - online in this case meaning police computer systems - not internet online


Maybe I'm an old fashioned IT guy - but online to me means digitised.

Siduhe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's not a new scam - I had this a few years back

> when someone opened a load of fake online shopping

> accounts in my name - but I'm sure is more

> prevalent now. It works like this:

>

> Scammer orders expensive goods in name of ED

> resident using credit or cloned card details. DHL

> or similar deliver parcel with expensive goods in.

> As soon as possible after real delivery, fake DHL

> driver knocks on door and says "oops, did you get

> a wrong delivery - our fault - I've come to take

> the parcel back". If the resident hands back the

> parcel, then the scammer gets to go off with the

> goods.

>

> In my case, I knew I hadn't ordered a tonne of

> men's clothes from Very and was on the phone with

> them when the scammer rang my door, but even

> though I had a strong suspicion it was a scam, he

> was totally convincing - even tried to take the

> phone off me to speak to Very to explain it was a

> delivery mistake. I can understand why people

> would hand back the parcel, even if they opened it

> and didn't think they had ordered it.



Ah ok, that makes sense, thanks.

The ?Tried to deliver? card scam very famous and quite old


20 years this scam has been running & running


They make the money when you call up the premium rate number


Then you get stung out of ?9.99 when it connects


Surprise surprise nothing was done


None of the millions thieved was ever recovered.


Modern version is the Royal Mail customs charge sms message.


The world?s scammers seem to flock to the United Kingdom, hey! Wonder why? 🤔

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Comparing to Week 11 last season, the table is a lot more compact, even the distance between top and bottom is half of what it was when RC was a runaway leader on 90+ points. Also worth remembering there are 25 or so game weeks left, so any points difference can slowly be eroded away. Week 11 points...   Week 11 table....      
    • Some people don’t like it, some people will love it.  It doesn’t bother me at all. In fact I quite like it. I do not like assumptions you make about ‘elderly people’. 
    • This concerns me as it essentially disregards the significant number of people who do experience a high level of disruption because of the event.  While it's great that you personally are not inconvenienced, this is absolutely not the case for a great many residents many of whom are elderly or who do not have private gardens and rely on the park.   Great that you have a PHD in ecology but might also be worth reading the report into the environmental impact of Gala which paints a rather different story to yours. This comes round every year with a request to extend. This seems to me to be a distraction to steer everyone away from the main event. However, Southwark Council and Councillor Catherine Rose in particular must bear responsibility for what is effectively privatisation of our community space.  I requested data on the results of the last consultations and had to use a subject access request to get it.  In 2024 the council received 111 responses of which 108 were negative. The event went ahead. Last year they received 136 of which 82 were negative and 34 said only with major changes (which did not happen).   The impact of the event on the community and the enviroment is well-documented.  The council has so far refused to supply data on the demographics of the attendees but it doesn't take much to work out that this is largely single under 30s from out of borough judging by the steady stream of people from the station.   Please do take time to protest and also to email Events as we try to hold the council accountable for their disregard of the public consultation results. Appendix 1.pdf 2025 consultation.pdf
    • 2 x 2 cubes if anyone has one going 🙏 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...