Jump to content

Recommended Posts

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Just pedestrianise Oxford Street if they want to

> ?reinvigorate? it. Most provincial high streets in

> England removed traffic decades ago and yet

> London?s ?premier shopping street?, is still a

> congested, polluted, mess.



I guess it would depend on where they re-routed all the buses to.


I think it's too late to reinvigorate Oxford Street. It is all becoming like the Tottenham Court Road end always was - full of tourist shops selling cheap rubbish, and huge bizarre candy shops.


And chains which just sell the same (boring) stuff you can get in their branches elsewhere.


I hope I'm wrong, but like I suspect many people I now do almost all my shopping online (the downside of that obviously being the items sent via Royal Mail which never arrive .....).


If there were more quirky independent shops, like in some other nearby areas, and more appealing places to eat, that might help, but I guess they couldn't afford the rents.

The issue with pedestrianisation of Oxford street is that currently people with limited mobility use buses and taxis to traverse it's length.

Remove vehicles and you will make it less accessible as its a long street so shoppers with mobility issues will go elsewhere.


Whilst you can argue that one or two shoppers going elsewhere isn't a big deal, they often come with family, carers or friends so the loss of shoppers increases.


On top of that many bus routes don't terminate on or near Oxford Street, but go through it to get to other destinations so they will need to be rerouted to bypass any closures.


A good example of both effects was the recent closure of Rye Lane where bus journeys took longer and businesses claim they suffered a fall in sales.


So the issue of closing to traffic isn't bad simple as it looks.

Dogkennelhillbilly Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Private Eye has covered this in-depth (apart from

> the "cops are too PC" bobbins at the end).


I haven't received a Private Eye for months. I took out a new subscription and received precisely one copy. I never received the free Christmas cards, either 🙄

Sign the Petition


https://www.change.org/p/westminster-council-save-the-marble-arch-mound


Save the Marble Arch Mound!

172 have signed. Let?s get to 200!


At 200 signatures, this petition is more likely to be featured in recommendations!


At 200 signatures, this petition is more likely to be featured in recommendations!


Alexander Bowen started this petition to Westminster Council

Constructed in May 2021, at a cost of ?6mn, the Marble Arch Mound has since become an icon to Londoners and tourists alike. The aim of this petition is to ask Westminster City Council to extend its lifespan beyond the proposed 9th of January dismantlement date. This icon of modern London and celebration of life during the Covid deconfinement period should be preserved and the many happy memories people have enjoyed on it should continue to take place. The Mound is both a piece of art and a piece of community - it must not be cut down in its prime especially in light of the money and joy already invested into it. Our message is simple - #SaveTheMound

"Leighton Giles?2 days ago

This is a wonderful example of not what to do and must serve as a remembrance to things so bad they?re good. Long live the Mound"


I agree with this and suggest the Mound should be renamed the "Vison Board Dumbshit Spending Other People's Money Memorial". The Council could have paid for dozens of social workers or teachers or environmental health offices or anything else...

Dogkennelhillbilly Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "Leighton Giles?2 days ago

> This is a wonderful example of not what to do and

> must serve as a remembrance to things so bad

> they?re good. Long live the Mound"

>

> I agree with this and suggest the Mound should be

> renamed the "Vison Board Dumbshit Spending Other

> People's Money Memorial". The Council could have

> paid for dozens of social workers or teachers or

> environmental health offices or anything else...


or...if you want even more headlines to raise awareness of the folly of the mound (and save money on dissaembly)...just get four of your mates to go round with some ropes and throw it into the Thames....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • And from what I remember, she eventually cut the tea shop for a similar  reason to chandelier.  Chariot style buggies
    • Oh yes, it could have been about there, I can't remember exactly. At one point there seemed to be a load of pizza places opening on NCR. I vaguely remember the one we used to use was put out of business by another one which opened. Wasn't Grace and Favour's food offering more of a tea shop at the back of the actual shop? If memory serves the owner, whose name escapes me now, was one of the earliest people I know to move to Hastings. Which must now be crammed with South East Londoners 🤣
    • That Neal Street veggie cafe was great. Food For Thought ❤️
    • Hi Dogkennelhillbilly, You won't be aware that i proposed infill sites for housing in East Dulwich - the garages on Bassano Street and Henslowe that respectively became 1-4 Dill Terrace family houses and the 78, 80, 80A Henslowe Street family houses. These were council owned garages and it was frustrating how slow the council was to go from my idea to completion (roughly eight years). East Dulwich has some other vacant WW2 bomb sites I'm guessing that the private land owners have been sitting on.Owe for a land tax for vacant land.  WRT to the builders yard by East dulwich station. Southwark Council has an agreed policy the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum. But the approved scheme is 9 storeys of student accommodation. Very hard to put this genie back in the bottle. The council has recently publicly stated lower ratios of social housing will be required. I will be amazed if the developer doesn't submit another application now they have the 9 storeys approved but with significantly less social housing. The less social housing the higher the land values. The higher the land values the less social housing viability reports state are possible.  If we really want to increase home supply - Southwark have over 6,000 empty homes. Vancouver charges a low % of the value of empty homes and rapidly eased this problem. Parts of Wales have introduced under Article 4 planning permission is required for second homes seeing within 12 months a dramatic decrease in property prices. Southwark Council have Article 4 requirements - why not add this one? It takes National political will to solve this AND regional and local authorities such as the second home council tax premium and these being used promptly. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...