Jump to content

Recommended Posts

True, and you can reduce the wrinkles on the forehead and around the eyes even more by never smiling.


Not sure re getting phlegm off chest though; although I scored around the same as Mahatma Ghandi on the political compass thread, I do think spitting in public ('oysters') should be a capital offence. Or at least flogging.

KalamityKel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The use of "basically" Should it be BASE-ick-ally,

> bas-ik-ally, basic-ally or just not used at all

>

> (personally can't stand the word and avoid using

> it where ever possible)



is it not "basiclee" ? (only shorter on the ee - I did study phonetics as part of my degree, but buggered if I can remember any of it)

KalamityKel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I've tried saying it as you've suggested... I just

> sound stupid... :-$



ahh, that seems odd, but fair enough. guess it's a question of three syllables or four - think both are fine. but as you say Nero, a good one to avoid, go with fundamentally instead


I have a friend who pronounces chocolate with three syllables (doubtless how it should be, but rarely is pronounced) - very cute

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Sad times, and these crimes are only going to increase whilst next to nothing is done.
    • I don't understand this thread. If police were involved to chase the cyclist, why does the OP say "thank God the cyclist got away"? Police don't chase random cyclists who have done nothing wrong! I had originally assumed that the original chasing car was a police car, as the OP talks about "seriously erratic and dangerous driving by the police", but it seems not? Unmarked police cars put on blue lights when they need to make themselves known. There have been quite a few around in this area lately. Surely a police car would have put on those lights before giving chase?
    • I have taken to not using my phone on pavements in London period.. feel very vulnerable around ED anyhow as am alot slower with walking these days. When  you-think about it, surely we can all last until get to cafe, hospital, train station, shop, etc without this overwhelming need to see/check phone! Bus times are usually accurate when you tip up and never long to wait for buses anyhow. I use my phone alot during the day for various reasons but, trying to not use it  is the real test. I have found that you can always ask someone who, generally happy to accommodate. Lanyard that Sue has suggested - good idea but still phone is visible in this heat I would have thought, assuming she wars it round her neck so personally, think it is worse as bikers, gangs etc can just rip it off as they pass.
    • In my experience working with police, esp Roads Policing, they don't drive erratically and dangerously. Most of them will be TPAC trained, or done advanced driving at the very least. Police in car chases live in fear of injuring or killing a member of the public, it genuinely is one of their worst nightmares. So I feel safe assuming that whatever the kid on a bike had done, the pursuit and tactics were justified.  I don't understand "Thank God the cyclist got away before 2 police vans arrived to help". Are you saying you're glad that a wanted, probably dangerous, criminal escaped a co-ordinated, tactical pursuit, involving three police units? That's weird, especially given how much people complain about crime round here. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...