Jump to content

Sue Gray report is out

Sue

By Sue
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

Spartacus

Spartacus

Posted
Posted

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Spartacus Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Sue

> > Are you the author ? 🤣

>

>

> No, just one of the many many Sues of that era

> :))

>

> Five in my class alone at one point in primary

> school :))


I guess Johnny Cash had an influence on your school year 🤔

TheCat

TheCat

Posted
Posted

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Spartacus Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Sue

> > Are you the author ? 🤣

>

>

> No, just one of the many many Sues of that era

> :))

>

> Five in my class alone at one point in primary

> school :))



Impresive...thats quite a lot of 'Sues', Sue...although lets all remember, you are talking to a bloke called 'Spartacus'.....:)

Sue

Sue

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Sephiroth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> try being called "John Smith"

>

> all of the lame check-in jokes

> or the "bitter/beer" jokes

> or the 20 other John Smiths at work




I don't know anybody called John Smith, apart from the famous ones!


I know a load of Sues, though!

TheCat

TheCat

Posted
Posted

Well a quick skim of the report suggests a massive anti-climax....no matter what your view on the PM and the goverenment....


9 pages of non-committall language and vague platitudes, which basically dont tell us anything we didnt already know....


Tory MP's should stop p!ssing about and get these letters into the 1922 committee....the damage being done as a result of government just drifting along, with a few hasilty thought out populist policies thrown in to divert attention is well beyond a joke now...

diable rouge

diable rouge

Posted
Posted

According to the report's Terms of Reference it was never going to be blockbuster stuff, but it was more critical than I expected e.g. ''the failure of leadership''. Don't forget, it was also heavily redacted, this is just an ''update''.


Starmer hasn't been the greatest LOTO, but his speech in the Commons was very good, and that will strike more of a chord with the public and the sacrifices we made. Lordy knows what Johnson was thinking of when he brought up Saville.


This is not going to go away and no amount of running-off to the Ukraine or hiding in fridges is going to detract from that, especially as we now know there definitely was a party in the No. 10 flat, which the Met are investigating.

Oh, and the small matter of 300+ photos in their files...

Sephiroth

Sephiroth

Posted
Posted

"Well a quick skim of the report suggests a massive anti-climax....no matter what your view on the PM and the goverenment."


the fact he publicly used a far-right Saville smear against KS and accused the opposition benches of being junkies suggests he is more riled than anti-climactic

wordsworth

wordsworth

Posted
Posted

Spartacus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Spartacus Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Sue

> > > Are you the author ? 🤣

> >

> >

> > No, just one of the many many Sues of that era

> > :))

> >

> > Five in my class alone at one point in primary

> > school :))

>

> I guess Johnny Cash had an influence on your

> school year 🤔



😂

Sue

Sue

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Sephiroth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "I don't know anybody called John Smith, apart

> from the famous ones! "

>

> Well I'm not famous but you know me and that's my

> name - even if I tend to go with the Irish version

> online (SeanMacGabhann)



Ah! I had forgotten!

TheCat

TheCat

Posted
Posted

Sephiroth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> " well beyond a joke now..."

>

> never invite a vampire into your home - he won't

> leave just because you've realised he's a vampire


Is this meant for me? I've never voted for party that includes Boris Johnson amongst its leaders

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • jk2016
      Electrician recommendation: Electrical Initiative Ltd

      By jk2016 · Posted

      Another great job from Leon - sorted a consumer unit and EICR for me last minute. Highly recommend 
    • Sue
      Local Dietician ?

      By Sue · Posted

      Admin, please move this if it's in the wrong section. Can anybody recommend a reasonably local dietician (or possibly nutritionist? Not sure what the difference is). My GP has suggested I see a dietician, but there isn't one attached to the practice. I have googled, but it's very hard to tell what people may be like from an online description, and I want somebody who is properly qualified. Alternatively, please PM me if you know of people I should avoid! Thanks x
    • Sue
      Dead cat found in our garden

      By Sue · Posted

      A vet might be able to trace its owners if it's chipped. Also I believe twb who posts on here has a mobile scanner. Poor cat.
    • ianr
      Application for Londis Off-Licence next to Charter East Entrance

      By ianr · Posted

      If you look at the application linked to in the OP, you'll see it's a Licensing Act 2003 one, in this case for the purposes of sale by retail of alcohol and for the provision of late night refreshment: "TAKEAWAY COFFEE/ HOT SNACKS 2300-0100". IF the shop counts as a Hot Food Takeaway, then section P48 of the Southwark Plan https://www.southwark.gov.uk/sites/default/files/2024-09/Southwark Plan 2022 reduced 1.pdf , which appears to be the latest one linked to on Southwark's site, will I presume be applied in any  planning application (Is there one?). It says: "New hot food takeaways will only be permitted where: ..... 3. The proposed location is further than 400 metres from any existing or proposed primary or secondary school’s boundary; ....." It incorporates  policy laid down in the National Planning Policy Framework, and thence the London Plan.  Over the years KFC, and others, have taken a  number of appeals against local planning authority decisions on Takeaways to the Planning Inspectorate.  Some have been allowed.  KFCs 'commentary on evidence contained in London Plan Topic Paper: Hot Food Takeaways', https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/nlp_ad_91.pdf may be of interest to some. I'm guessing it's referring to https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/london_plan_topic_paper_on_hot_food_takeaways.pdf of 2018, but haven't yet checked.  

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...