Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just to make things clear - even before the recent changes I had right of way, as a pedestrian, at a zebra crossing. I did not exercise that 'right' until I had ascertained that the oncoming motorists had seen me and had reacted to that (forget about cyclists, for whom too many acted as if that 'rule' did not apply to them). I was not so stupid as to believe that stepping off into a road at a zebra crossing would automatically preserve my life or limb because I was 'in the right'. I already see too many taking no notice of road conditions (i.e. by looking at phones etc.) before stepping into the road.


The new Highway Code revisions do not paint a force field around pedestrians to make them invulnerable to traffic. Forget about the blame game, if they step in front of traffic that is still moving they will likely be hurt. I would rather not be hurt than have the posthumous satisfaction of a driver being convicted of dangerous driving by 'breaking' the new code.

DuncanW Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Once in the road, did she not have priority over a

> car under the old version of the Highway Code

> anyway? It seems like the OP certainly afforded

> her that consideration. I'm assuming the OP was

> the driver of a car that had to stop for her. Had

> they seen her in ample time to stop, which I take

> to be the case, but not done so, they would have

> been at fault anyway.

>


This is correct. I was also paying attention to the road and pavements. As was the van driver coming the other way, fortunately. And I was sub-20mph.

LMCPR Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Had to check as I thought I might have been that

> lady.... Chadwick Road is in Peckham... go on

> Peckham's forum and tell their community

>


You read it here and you post here too.


If this was you please don't do it again. Thank you 😊

It all about sharing road space. For some reason many, mainly motorists, some of which could be described as entitled, don't get it.


The Highway Code has, in my lifetime, always given equal priority to road users. Sadly because some with metal boxes think otherwise, it has to be revised from time to time. Governments have also often given lip service to this. Wouldn't it be lovely if more motorists got points for hassling other road users.


Most road users to share happily with others. Too many don't.


PM me if you want a safe driving lesson, a safe cycling lesson, and if you have a motorbike I can also give you a lesson on that. Not yet branched into scooters, but should expand into safe pedestrianising.

redpost Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > The Sun explains it better for its readers :

> >

> > The new Highway Code hierarchy is as follows:

> > Pedestrians

> > Cyclists

> > Horse Riders

> > Motorcyclists

> > Cars/taxis

> > Vans/minibuses

> > Large passenger vehicles or courier vehicles

> like

> > buses and HGVs

> >

> > Cyclists now have a higher power over vehicles

>

> Perhaps you should read the new highway code and

> see what it's actually about instead of getting it

> from the Sun?


LOL - That was the point :)

Sadly, as someone who drives for a living, it seems pedestrians have become complacent when it comes to road sense!

To me it seems many people value their phones/headphones etc more than their lives or their childrens.

Especially in the afternoons I see parents crossing major roads with their children yards away from proper crossing places, it makes me sad & sometimes I feel like I want to say something. If this is how children are taught to cross the road from a young age how can you expect better from them when they get older!

I also see buggies getting pushed out into the roads even before the person pushing it has had a look!


All these new Highway Code rulings are not helping anybody, first & foremost an individual has to take responsibility for their actions, wether they are a cyclist, pedestrian, driver or whomever!


The deliveroo/Uber eats/ or any other cyclists of that nature are one of the most dangerous out there.

It?s common sense to have a basic knowledge of road sense when using roads especially in a city like London! Even more so having a roadworthy bike is paramount!


Such sad times???

I?ve taken to riding my unicycle with both my children strapped front and back in baby slings.

We all watch an episode of In The Night Garden as we cycle down the central reservation or the pavement, whichever is busier.


I?m in the right, whatever you say. So get used to it.


So done with your moral & judgmental pollution.


Fuck you

I highly recommend watching a few of the Ogmios School of Zen Motoring videos (as recently seen on TFL adverts) - I'm a pedestrian, cyclist and driver, and yes - there are a lot of muppets on and around the roads. But every time I'm tempted to get wound up by someone else on or around the road, this is how I try and react. It's a small thing but it works for me.




Although the 45 year old Dulwich Dad (wearing a Carhart jacket and riding a fixie) who threatened to get off his bike and "teach you a f**king lesson about how to ride a bike, that you won't f**ing like" earlier this week because I stopped at a red light with a green pedestrian phase (and pedestrians crossing) that he wanted to cycle through at high speed can do one.

'Cyclists now have a higher power over vehicles'


What total bolloxs. Perhaps HMG should actually try to inform the masses what this is all about, rather than expecting the Sun to do it. Funnily enough in another life we used to Sun to get nice succinct messages over to the consumers, as it has a lot of influence.


Like the chilled TfL vid, this sort of thing can make me a little embarrassed about my behaviour. Sometimes I am angry, sometimes I try to politely tell people to cycle, drive or walk better, sometimes I am just chilled.


At my worst I have very gently ridden into people who walk straight across me, perhaps not great behaviour. And even worse after shouting, and doing an emergency and got no response shouted I'll run you over next time. Anyway a handful of times, and something not proud of despite a smile on my face as I type.


I'd prefer to say for every bad experience I have a dozen good experiences.


Well chilled out as after posting a Norma Waterson track on EDF it's gone to some chillaxed Norther Soul on Youtube. Not that this is relevant to the thread. And you can comment on chillax on my thread on new words that have got into our language.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • But at the same time those she sought for advice told her, very clearly, she needed to seek specialist advice which she did not do and carried on regardless. So I think the jury is out on whether this was a legitimate mistake or not.
    • Thanks @Sephiroth I was thinking along the same lines (demonisation of Rayner by the media) and came across this article yesterday from Manchester Evening News.  It doesn't excuse her, but the title "Angela Rayner's real offence was being a working class woman in power" is self explanatory. https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/angela-rayners-real-offence-being-32422596 The crossing legs nonsense is particularly telling.
    • Given her role, she pretty much had to go. I don't think she is an avid tax-schemer who deliberately set out to avoid tax - I do pretty much believe her story of multiple high-profile roles and looking after a child with needs. But many regular voters juggle demanding jobs and families and are afforded no leeway by taxman, so she totally should have known better But here we are - she was found to be negligent and now she has suffered teh consequence. To me that its the OPPOSITE of all parties/politicians as generally the ignore the whole thing (today we have Tice saying Farage's tax affairs are of no interest to voters for example) And it would be poor form to not acknowledge why she was targeted quite so viciously - we even have posters on here here saying "when I saw her taping on a boat that was the  end for me" - like the end of what?. Her gender and class were clear motivators for many people. Two wrongs don't make a right - but it';s interesting to see some posters on here give so many others a blank cheque. Many are planning to vote for Farage despite his dishonesty being 100x worse than Rayner PS - I don't think she will join Corbyn party - unlike him she is smart and unlike him she recognises that being In power means you can at least stand a chance of delivering results This. The Greens will have a rise in the polls on back of new leader but that is one hell of a coalition of NIMBY/YIMBYs As what would Reform do if in government to help with... well, anything?   Labour can at least point to decreasing waiting lists, lower immigration numbers, not having a different PM every 6 months - not that anyone is listening
    • So what do people want?  More housing.  More affordable housing.  But not in my back yard. That applies to urban areas too.  Easy to criticise, but where are your answers?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...