Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Maria Zakharova has just made a nice comment involving Swedish and Finnish NATO accession. These people running Russia must be totally paranoid. And they're right to be paranoid too, because they can't stop lying. And they lie because they are thieves.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The situation is indeed worrying.

>

> One thing we all have to be thankful for is that

> Trump is no longer in charge.

>

> DulwichFox


There's quite a lot of analysis and commentary around suggesting the whole thing was very unlikely to have taken place had Trump still been in power.


In anycase, I can't say I'm feeling particularly encouraged by the 'leadership' old sleepy Joe has shown.....

"There's quite a lot of analysis and commentary around suggesting the whole thing was very unlikely to have taken place had Trump still been in power. "


not from anyone credible - unless you care to illustrate otherwise?


It's basically a pro-Putin line despite any protestations to contrary


Frankly you should be ashamed to even type something like that

Honestly. Do you have an alert set up whenever I post, so you can wind up your 'indignant' meter with an overly aggressive and unessary post? This seeming obsession with rubbishing or shaming every post I make is totally unnessary. Im sorry my very existence seems to irritate you so.


I made an observation, which is factually true. There is indeed a lot of commentary to that effect.


I'm not ashamed of that in the slightest.

There are also a lot of reports claiming that the Ukrainian govt are nazis and killing innocent people - that doesn't make them true


Your post is implicitly supporting that view (about if Trump was president there would be no war) - and you certainly aren't saying you disagree with it. So give over with the "hey I'm just a neutral messenger"


days after Trump spoke of admiring and supporting Putin - why would anyone do that?

Just becuase you are incapable of being a neutral or objective observer. Please don't assume others cannot.


I don't know whether I agree with those views or not..im not the expert in international defence strategy that you apparently have recently become. It would seem to me that some of that commentary is not totally unreasonable from 30secends of cursory thought. Polls have shown that over 60 percent of US citizens seem to think Ukraine invasion was less likely if Trump was still in office, and Biden's approval ratings with respect to how he has dealt with this are very poor. Again, I don't know if that's the right or wrong view (I'm sure you'll helpfully tell me who you view as a credible observer..my guess is someone who already agrees with you?).


So anyway, perhaps a discussion over the issue isn't so fringe/outrageous/ridiculous/shameful as you seem to think it is.

''Just becuase you are incapable of being a neutral or objective observer. Please don't assume others cannot.''


If only that were true, if only.


Over the years I've learnt that with Cat's posts it's not so much about what he writes, but why he writes, today's gambit being a perfect example.


We know what you are...

I mean leaving personalities aside. What?s the smart, objective, neutral take when a thug like Putin invades another European country


So many far left and far right commentators saying it?s the wests fault, natos fault etc etc. are just apologists for war crimes. And no amount of indignation can hide that


And to have trump saying putin is smart and approving him. And to not take the opportunity to condemn that? Because? why wouldn?t you?

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ''Just becuase you are incapable of being a

> neutral or objective observer. Please don't assume

> others cannot.''

>

> If only that were true, if only.

>

> Over the years I've learnt that with Cat's posts

> it's not so much about what he writes, but why he

> writes, today's gambit being a perfect example.

>

> We know what you are...



If you could please let me know 'why' I wrote today's 'gambit'....I would really appreciate it....


(As an aside, it's really quite a skill that you and seph have to turn what was really a fairly innocuous initial post into some sort of indignant crusade against my devious hidden agenda)

Why would the views of tens of millions of Americans on Ukraine/Putin, especially if they?re Trump supporters, have any meaningful bearing at all (apart from to warn us what a state the US is in) ? And why would that even be reported by media ?!


And Cat, what you?re saying is your post was completely neutral, just floating a view for the benefit of EDF readers, a view from arguably the dumbest portion of US society, because you thought that?d be useful here, right ?

Not sure how calling Republicans dumb helps anything. It is like saying all Brexteers are stupid. Yes there are some dumb Trump supporters, and some stupid people who voted for Brexit. But there are also clever, educated people too. Confusing of course but true. And at the moment I expect Trump is favourite to get back in again. Now that with Putin is worrying.....


[confusing but true was a facetious remark)

What absolute nonsense you write. And that's the polite version!!!!!!!!!


TheCat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Just becuase you are incapable of being a neutral

> or objective observer. Please don't assume others

> cannot.

>

> I don't know whether I agree with those views or

> not..im not the expert in international defence

> strategy that you apparently have recently become.

> It would seem to me that some of that commentary

> is not totally unreasonable from 30secends of

> cursory thought. Polls have shown that over 60

> percent of US citizens seem to think Ukraine

> invasion was less likely if Trump was still in

> office, and Biden's approval ratings with respect

> to how he has dealt with this are very poor.

> Again, I don't know if that's the right or wrong

> view (I'm sure you'll helpfully tell me who you

> view as a credible observer..my guess is someone

> who already agrees with you?).

>

> So anyway, perhaps a discussion over the issue

> isn't so fringe/outrageous/ridiculous/shameful as

> you seem to think it is.

Thousands of innocent women and children being blown out of their homes by an illegal invasion, and someone wants to deflect the conversation onto a pro-Putin hypothetical that it wouldn't have happened under Trump.


Sigh all you want Cat, you're shameless...

It?s a generalisation Malumbu, which it has to be seeing as I don?t know each of them personally.

But look at them, and look at what they support, still. And who (the person) they voted for.

There?s a serious shortfall in wits at hand hence my expression dumb as.

Nobody would like to be proven wrong more than me !


And Cat, I don?t think people are looking for a fight, you do have some control over the responses you get to your posts - chiefly, what you include in them !

Agreed Mal.


For the record (and it's disappointing that I even need to say this), I thought:think Trump was a total disaster and embarrassment to the US (and the 'free world')....


The 'fault' for the invasion of Ukraine lies squarely with Putin, and it's only people with an axe to grind against me personally, who could somehow contort themselves to imply that my initial comment suggested anything otherwise.


Furthermore, in a wide ranging discussion on the whole issue, why should Biden escape criticism (as he seemingly has on this entire thread, and from people who typically aren't shy about criticising governments and their actions). And why is it not legitimate to compare his actions against the president who held office immediately prior to him?


Apparently though it is. Apparently saying something not totally negative about Trump means implicit support of everything about the man. Apparently citing the views of 60 percent of the US population (according to polls) is a waste of time for the intelligentsia of the EDF. Because thinking about such things is only for the 'dumbest' or those pushing their devious agenda. Apparently, mentioniung such things, and doing so in the name of objectivity is grounds for being mocked for not being objective. Because, apparently, to some others, 'objectivity' doesn't involve thinking about things from different perspectives. It warrants mockery and dismissal.


Mal...you ask in another thread why people don't contribute to discussions in the Lounge...unfort for every poster such as yourself who will respect most posters and different perspectives, there are another two who prefer to bully people into not really bothering....

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Thousands of innocent women and children being

> blown out of their homes by an illegal invasion,

> and someone wants to deflect the conversation onto

> a pro-Putin hypothetical that it wouldn't have

> happened under Trump.

>

> Sigh all you want Cat, you're shameless...


All this coming from a poster....who on the first page of this very thread has attempted to draw lines of inference between Putin's actions and Brexit, as well as between Putin's actions and Johnson's 'boosterism' and lack of action on Russian money in the UK.


So it seems according to DR it's not shameless to make those linkages, and apportion some blame to Brexit and Boris.....but to imply the that actions of the leader of the free world might have a linkage....well that, apparently, is shameless..


You truly are beyond parody.

You have to give it to these guys.


President of Ukraine is a comedy actor who played a president in a comedy series and ended up as real President and then when the USA offers to fly him out of the country he refuses so he can fight


Mayor is a boxer who we started of hating but sort of charmed everyone as Champion and he's taking up arms too.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Back on topic (!),  just a reminder that the new incarnation of the ED Forum drinks will be in The Palmerston TOMORROW Wednesday 11 June from 7pm. Turn immediately left as you come in by the main  Lordship Lane entrance, and we will be in the area there. Hope that at least a few of you will be up for getting to know some of your fellow forum members in real life!
    • For the past 15 years, I’ve been subjected to persistent passive-aggressive bullying and harassment by my upstairs neighbours. Their behaviour has included tampering with my plants, opening bin bags and questioning me about their contents, and interfering with misdelivered post — some of which appeared to have been opened. There has also been consistent noise disruption, like loud door banging and deliberately dropping heavy objects. They often laugh or stare at me when I’m in the garden, creating a constant sense of intimidation. Much of their conduct is subtle and hard to prove, often falling into a grey area that could easily be dismissed as paranoia, which makes it even more distressing. In the early years, I sometimes responded, but I realised this only seemed to encourage them. Since then, I’ve tried to remain calm and avoid confrontation — but unfortunately, this seems to have escalated things. After the recent death of a close family member, they left a condolence note, which at first seemed kind — but it came with a request to cut back my laurel bush, which I maintain for privacy, as I often feel watched in my own garden. The timing and nature of the request felt inappropriate. Still, I arranged for a gardening service and slightly reduced the laurel, though likely not as much as they wanted. Shortly after, one neighbour commented on how lovely one of my potted plants looked — which struck me as unusual, since we’ve barely spoken in years. Just days later, they told me the same plant looked like it was dying and asked if they should water it. Soon after, it rapidly turned yellow, brittle, and died — in a way that looked clearly unnatural. From photos, it appears the plant was poisoned, likely with a chemical weed killer. Access to that area is restricted — it’s behind a locked front gate monitored by a Smart CCTV camera. No one else had access, and it would be very difficult for someone to climb over the wall unnoticed. Given the timing and condition of the plant, I strongly suspect it was deliberately poisoned. I brought this up in a chat with my next-door neighbours, and they revealed they’d lost three trees along the same fence line over the past few months. One of them had previously been asked for access to cut back those very trees. One of the affected trees was a mature silver birch, whose sudden death should leave chemical evidence if tested. I’ve reported the incident to the Environment Agency and requested soil testing to check for toxins. The police have also been notified. I’ve installed another CCTV camera for additional monitoring. I’m not looking for confrontation — I just want to live peacefully and without further interference. But their behaviour continues to feel calculated and harassing. Has anyone experienced anything similar? What steps would you recommend next? I feel at a loss as to how to protect my space and sanity.
    • The Post Offcie certify copy documents. Check with whoever needs it if they would be appropriate 
    • https://williambaileysolicitors.co.uk/ William Bailey is a well-established local solicitors firm based in Goose Green I've used them in the past with no complaints
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...